Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3988 MP
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2021
1
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
CRA-621-2019
(SANTOSH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
Gwalior, Dated:-05/08/2021
Heard through Video Conferencing.
Shri Nitin Agarwal, learned counsel for appellant No.2-Geeta
Bai.
Shri Deepak Shrivastava, learned counsel for appellant No.3-
Mohar Singh.
Shri R.S. Kushwah, learned Deputy Advocate General for the
respondent/State.
I.A.No.20626/2021, an application for urgent hearing is taken
up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein.
At the very outset, learned counsel for appellant No.3-Mohar
Singh seeks and is permitted to withdraw I.A. No. 9776/2020, which
is repeat application for suspension of sentence on behalf of appellant
No.3-Mohar Singh.
Accordingly, I.A.No.9776/2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Also heard on I.A.No.20625/2021, which is fourth application
filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. on behalf of appellant No.2-
Geeta Bai for suspension of her jail sentence.
Vide judgment dated 31/12/2018 passed by the Second
Additional Sessions Judge, Ashoknagar to the Court of First
Additional Sessions Judge, Ashoknagar, District Ashoknagar (M.P.) in
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CRA-621-2019 (SANTOSH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
ST No.64/2009 appellant No.2 has been convicted and sentenced as
under:
Section Sentence Fine In default
stipulation
194 of I.P.C. 10 years of R.I. Rs.1000/- three months
R.I.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant No.2-Geeta
Bai the the appellant No.2-Geeta Bai is a lady aged around 55 years.
This Court had earlier temporarily suspended the jail sentence of
appellant No.2 for a period of 60 days vide order dated 05/12/2020
and she has not misused the liberty of temporary suspension so
granted to her. It is further submitted that the fine amount has already
been deposited. Appellant No.2-Geeta Bai is still suffering from
medical ailments. In support of aforesaid arguments, learned counsel
for the appellant No.2 has filed medical documents. Learned counsel
for the applicant relied upon the judgment passed by the Division
Bench at Principal Seat, Jabalpur in W.P.No.9320/2021 (In
reference Suo Motu Vs. State of M.P.). Learned counsel for the
appellant further submits that hearing of this appeal shall take
considerably long time. Under these circumstances, he prayed to
suspend the jail sentence of the appellant No.2-Geeta Bai for a period
of 90 days.
On the other hand, learned State Counsel vehemently opposed
The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CRA-621-2019 (SANTOSH AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
the same and has submitted that the date of judgment is 31/12/2018
and custody period is very short i.e., around 2 ½ years. Considering
the nature of offence which has been committed by appellant No.2-
Geeta Bai, prayed for dismissal of the application for suspension of
sentence.
Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the
documents available on record.
On perusal of record, it is apparent that though appellant No.2-
Geeta Bai is suffering from medical ailment but doctor has not
specified that Geeta Bai is suffering from any serious ailment.
Therefore, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the appellant No.2-Geeta Bai
by way of suspension of jail sentence.
Accordingly, I.A.No.20625/2021 stands rejected.
(Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava) Judge Monika Digitally signed by MONIKA SHARMA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF
MONIKA MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, ou=HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH GWALIOR, postalCode=474011, st=Madhya
SHARMA Pradesh, 2.5.4.20=1cbbae26c87c00013f504674 8e62527c7ddf7dd9146694af9eed96f 47a359612, cn=MONIKA SHARMA Date: 2021.08.06 11:04:37 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!