Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Narayan Industries vs State Bank Of India
2021 Latest Caselaw 3910 MP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3910 MP
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2021

Madhya Pradesh High Court
M/S Narayan Industries vs State Bank Of India on 3 August, 2021
Author: Prakash Shrivastava
                                                                               1                                 WP-2354-2021
                                                    The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
                                                               WP-2354-2021
                                                              (M/S NARAYAN INDUSTRIES Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA)

                                        9
                                        Jabalpur, Dated : 03-08-2021
                                                Heard through Video Conferencing.
                                                Shri Ashish Anand Barnard, learned counsel for the petitioner.
                                                Shri J. Patel, learned counsel for the respondent.

Heard on I.A.No.6614/2021, which is an application for amendment of the petition.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the necessity of the amendment arose since the respondents have disclosed in the reply that the benefit of the Scheme dated 12.10.2020 is confined to those who are under D-1, D-2 and D-3 as on 31.3.2020. Therefore, now the petitioner is required to challenge the said Clause of the Scheme by way of amendment.

Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the amendment and has placed reliance upon the Division Bench judgment of the Allahabad High Court reported in 2004 (3) Banking Cases 455 DB [Sardar Prem Singh Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.] ]by submitting that the petitioner has no right of OTS and the OTS depends upon the consent of the parties.

Since at this stage, this Court is not considering the merits of the amendment, therefore, considering the nature of controversy involved in the petition and the amendment proposed, we are of the opinion that the I.A. deserves to be allowed.

Hence, I.A.No.6614/2021 is allowed.

The petitioner is granted two week's time to incorporate the amendment and is also directed to file the copy of the amended petition.

In view of the amendment, the respondents will have right to file the additional reply, if required.

List after four weeks.

                                              (PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA)                                    (VIRENDER SINGH)
                                                     JUDGE                                                     JUDGE


Signature Not Verified
                                        P/-
  SAN




Digitally signed by MRS PREETI TIWARI
Date: 2021.08.03 16:22:47 IST
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter