Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1522 MP
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2021
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.19793/2021 (SANTOSH SEN VS. STATE OF M.P. & ANR.)
Gwalior, Dated : 22.04.2021
Shri Suresh Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Rohit Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.
Heard finally, through video conferencing.
Case diary is not available. Accordingly, the bail application is
being decided on the basis of the averments made in the application
as well as facts mentioned in the impugned order.
This second repeat application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
has been filed for grant of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 11/01/2021 in connection
with Crime No.291/2019 registered at Police Station Dehat, District
Shivpuri for offence under Sections 363, 366, 376 of IPC and Section
3/4 of the POCSO Act.
It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that the
prosecutrix has been examined and now there is no possibility of
winning over the prosecution witnesses.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
Counsel for the State. It is submitted by the counsel for the State that
as per the school record, the age of the prosecutrix is 16 years and 9
months.
Looking to the age of the prosecutrix as well as in the light of
the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of
Independent Thought Vs. Union of India & Anr. reported in
2017(10) SCC 800 by which sub-section 2 of section 375 of IPC has
been read down, no case is made out for grant of bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, the application fails and is hereby dismissed.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge Pj'S/-
Digitally signed by PRINCEE BARAIYA Date: 2021.04.23 10:29:09 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!