Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1358 MP
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 1
MCRC 19064/2021
Divesh (Devesh) Jogi vs. State of MP
Gwalior, Dated : 07/04/2021
Shri Prasun Kumar Maheshwari, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri Rohit Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/ State.
Case diary is not available.
It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that the police has
filed the charge sheet and copy of the charge sheet has been filed by co-
accused Pintu alias Pushpendra in MCRC No.18839 of 2021 and,
therefore, the present application may be considered in the light of the
charge sheet.
This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant
of bail.
The applicant has been arrested on 20/08/2020 in connection with
Crime No.442/2020 registered by Police Station Kotwali, District Ashok
Nagar, for offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 & 34 of IPC.
It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that according to
the prosecution case, the dead body of one Radheyshyam was found in a
well. According to the prosecution case, the applicant was found to be in
possession of one SIM. So far as the evidence of extra-judicial
confession made to one Chhotu Ahirwar is concerned, the said witness
has already been examined and he has not supported the prosecution case
and co-accused Pintu alias Pushpendra has also filed copy of deposition
sheet of Chhotu Ahirwar. At present, there is no substantive evidence
against the applicant and the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time.
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 2 MCRC 19064/2021 Divesh (Devesh) Jogi vs. State of MP
It is further submitted that the recovery of SIM has been falsely shown
because there was no good reason for the applicant to keep the same with
him, specifically when it was already blocked because of insufficient
balance. However, there is nothing on record to indicate that the said Sim
was of the deceased. This Court, by order dated 10/12/2020 passed in
MCRC No.50017/2020, has already granted bail to co-accused Neeraj
alias Neetu.
Per contra, the application is opposed by the Counsel for the State.
However, it is fairly conceded that the prosecution witness Chhotu
Ahirwar has already turned hostile and has not supported the prosecution
case.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without
commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is
directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lac only) with one surety
in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court
to appear before the Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in case
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat & Ors. vs. State of M.P. passed on 18/3/2021 in
Criminal Appeal No.329/2021, the intimation regarding grant of bail be THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 3 MCRC 19064/2021 Divesh (Devesh) Jogi vs. State of MP
sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rule.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge
MKB
MAHENDRA KUMAR BARIK 2021.04.08 10:28:34 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!