Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Siyad vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 960 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 960 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Siyad vs State Of Kerala on 30 January, 2026

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
B.A.No.196/2026

                                      1

                                                          2026:KER:7604

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

  FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 10TH MAGHA, 1947

                        BAIL APPL. NO. 196 OF 2026

   CRIME NO.743/2025 OF Kalady Police Station, Ernakulam

      AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.12.2025 IN CRMP 3111/2025

IN SC NO.1678 OF 2025 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS

COURT-I, NORTH PARAVUR

PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED:

           SIYAD, AGED 48 YEARS
           S/O ALIYAR AMBADAN HOUSE, RAYONPURAM BHAGHAM
           VALLAM KARA, CHELAMATTOM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN
           - 683550

           BY ADV SRI.AJEESH M UMMER


RESPONDENT/STATE:

           STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
           KERALA, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031


           SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP


      THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.01.2026,       THE    COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 B.A.No.196/2026

                                   2

                                                     2026:KER:7604




                                 ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS),

seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.3 in Crime

No.743/2025 of Kalady Police Station, Ernakulam District now

pending as S.C.No.1678/2025 on the files of the Additional

District and Sessions Court-I, North Paravur. The offences alleged

are punishable under Sections 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the

NDPS Act), Section 125 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

and Section 199(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the

accused Nos. 1 to 4 and one CCL who is arrayed as the accused

No.5 together decided to procure methamphetamine from

Bangalore and accordingly, the accused Nos. 1 and 2 went to

Bangalore and procured 99.40 gms of MDMA and brought to

Kerala on 28.5.2025. While the accused Nos. 1 and 5 were

transporting the contraband in a scooter bearing registration

2026:KER:7604

No.KL-41-A-1263 at 10.05 am on 28.5.2025, they were

intercepted by the police and the contraband were seized. It is

alleged that the applicant gave financial assistance to the

accused No.2 to procure the contraband. Thus the applicant and

the remaining accused have committed the above offences.

4. I have heard Sri. Ajeesh M. Ummer, the learned

counsel for the applicant and Sri. K.A. Noushand, the learned

Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted

that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in

the present case. The counsel further submitted that no

materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged

crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the

learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged

incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the

applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant moved an application for regular

bail as B.A.No.13744/2025 before this Court during the crime

stage. It was dismissed on 24.11.2025 holding that the bar

under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is applicable to the facts of the

case and that the applicant has criminal antecedents. The

learned counsel for the applicant submitted that after the

2026:KER:7604

disposal of the above bail application, the final report has been

filed and there is nothing in the final report to connect the

applicant with the crime and hence, there is a change of

circumstances. I find some force in the said submission.

7. I went through the final report. The allegation

against the applicant is that, he along with the accused Nos. 1

and 2 decided to procure the contraband from Bangalore and

accordingly, accused Nos. 1 and 2 went to Bangalore and

procured the contraband. It is also alleged that the applicant had

given ₹90,000/- to the accused No.2 to procure the contraband.

However, no material could be collected by the investigating

agency to prove the said financial transaction between the

applicant and the accused No.2. A perusal of the final report

would show that the only material collected by the investigating

agency to connect him with the alleged offence is few telephone

calls and Whatsapp chats between him and the accused Nos. 1

and 2. The applicant is in custody for the last more than four

months. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in

all the cases allegedly pending against the applicant and pointed

out by the learned Senior Prosecutor, he was already acquitted.

Considering all these facts and circumstances, I am of the view

that the rigor of Section 37 of the NDPS Act would not be

2026:KER:7604

attracted against the applicant and he can be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following

conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on

executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with

two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of

the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a

like nature while on bail.

(iii) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of

the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person,

or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence

any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(iv) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala

without the permission of the trial Court.

(v) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of

the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of

violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional

court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp

2026:KER:7604

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 196 OF 2026

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 A COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL MP 3111/2025 IN SC 1678/2025 DATED 30.12.2025 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVOOR Annexure 2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 743/2025 OF KALADY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT DATED 23.11.2025 Annexure 3 A TRUE OF THE STATEMENT OF CW31 RECORDED UNDER SECTION 180 OF BNSS DATED 29.06.2025 Annexure 4 A TRUE OF THE STATEMENT OF CW34 RECORDED UNDER SECTION 180 OF BNSS DATED 27.08.2025 Annexure 5 A TRUE OF THE STATEMENT OF CW35 RECORDED UNDER SECTION 180 OF BNSS DATED 28.08.2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter