Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shihabudheen @ Faizu vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 885 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 885 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shihabudheen @ Faizu vs State Of Kerala on 29 January, 2026

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
                                                         2026:KER:7170


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

            THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

     THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 9TH MAGHA, 1947

                    BAIL APPL. NO. 13536 OF 2025

 CRIME NO.13/2020 OF EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL

                     SQUAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

        AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.08.2025 IN BAIL APPL. NO.9954

OF 2025 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA


PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5(IN CUSTODY FROM 01.12.2023):

    1       SHIHABUDHEEN @ FAIZU
            AGED 50 YEARS
            MOIDHEEN PALLI PADINJARE VEETTIL, AKALAD P.O,
            PUNNAYUR VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
            THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680518


            BY ADVS.
            SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH
            SRI.LIBIN STANLEY
            SMT.SAIPOOJA
            SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL
            SMT.R.GAYATHRI
            SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA
            SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH
            SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE


RESPONDENT/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682031

    2       THE ASSISTANE EXCISE COMMISSIONER
            EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695033
 B.A.No.13536 of 2025             -2-


                                                      2026:KER:7170

            SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


      THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 B.A.No.13536 of 2025                    -3-


                                                           2026:KER:7170




                                   ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.5 in S.C.

No.2615/2023 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court-I,

Thiruvananthapuram. The offences alleged are punishable

under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, NDPS ACT)

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that accused Nos.1

to 4 were found in possession of 3 kgs of hashish oil and 101

kgs of ganja at about 10 a.m. on 08.10.2020 in a Mahindra

Bolero van bearing registration No.KL-16F-2824 and an Ashok

Leyland van bearing registration No.KL-43D-7923 which belongs

to the applicant and thereby committed the offences. It is

further alleged that the applicant instructed accused No.6 to

procure contraband, who after procuring the same handed over

to accused Nos.1 to 4.

4. I have heard Sri.P.Mohamed Sabah, the learned

counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned

Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

2026:KER:7170

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that

the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials

are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime;

hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned

Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident

occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the

applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

01.12.2023. A perusal of the case diary would reveal that the

accusation against the applicant is very serious, and it prima

facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. Since the

quantity involved is commercial, the jurisdiction of this Court to

grant bail is circumscribed by the provisions of Section 37 of the

NDPS Act. Bail can be granted in a case where there are

reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty

of such an offence and that he is not likely to commit any

offence while on bail.

7. The Additional Sessions Court-I, Thiruvananthapuram

tried the case originally as S.C. No.734/2021 against accused

Nos.1 to 4. At that time, since accused Nos.5 and 6 were

2026:KER:7170

absconding, no final report was filed against them.

Subsequently, accused No.6 was arrested, his case was

committed and tried as S.C. No.837/2023 along with

S.C. No.734/2021. Accused Nos.1 to 4 were convicted and

accused No.6 was acquitted. Thereafter, applicant/accused No.5

was also arrested and case as against him was numbered as

S.C. No.2615/2023. It is now pending before the Additional

Sessions Court-I, Thiruvananathapuram. The applicant is in

custody since 01.12.2023. The learned counsel for the applicant

submitted that accused No.6 who is in the same footing as that

of the applicant was already found not guilty and acquitted.

Therefore, the rigor of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot be

attracted against him and hence, he is entitled for bail. I cannot

subscribe to the said argument. A perusal of the final report

would show that the allegation against the applicant and

accused No.6 is not one and the same. The allegation against

accused No.6 is that he procured contraband utilizing the

money given by the applicant and handed over to accused

No.1. Apart from the said allegation, the specific case against

the applicant is that, his vehicle was used for transporting the

contraband. The Excise party seized the contraband while

2026:KER:7170

shifting the same from the car driven by accused Nos.1 and 2,

to the van belonging to the applicant. Moreover, the applicant

has criminal antecedents.

8. Having considered the submissions and after having

gone through the materials on record, I am afraid that there

are no substantial or probable causes for believing that the

applicant is not guilty of the offences charged. The applicant

has not been able to point out the existence of any such facts

or circumstances as are sufficient to justify recording a finding

that he is not guilty of the offences charged.

Considering the nature of the crime, the gravity of the

offence, the complicity of the applicant in it, and the facts and

circumstances mentioned above, I am of the view that the

applicant cannot be released on bail at this stage. The bail

application, accordingly, is dismissed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

JUDGE SKP

2026:KER:7170

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 13536 OF 2025

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.08.2025 IN B.A NO.9954/2025 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02.09.2024 IN CRL.M.P. NO.4008/2024 IN S.C.NO.2615 OF 2023 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-I, THIRUVANATHAPURAM Annexure 4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14.12.2025 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF AMBALA THWAHA JUMUATH MUSLIM SAMITHY

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A. TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter