Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sai Sanker vs State Of Kerala
2026 Latest Caselaw 1000 Ker

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1000 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sai Sanker vs State Of Kerala on 30 January, 2026

Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
B.A.No. 93 of 2026

                                ..1..

                                                     2026:KER:7940


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

   FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 10TH MAGHA, 1947

                     BAIL APPL. NO. 93 OF 2026

 CRIME NO.853/2025 OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 26.12.2025 IN CRL.MC NO.3473 OF 2025
        OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT - VII, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

           SAI SANKER
           AGED 39 YEARS
           16A, LIFESTYLE TOWERS,
           NEAR GOVERNMENT HOMEO COLLEGE,
           CALICUT, PRESENTLY
           RESIDING AT FLAT NO. Q222, Q BLOCK,
           DLF NEW TOWN HEIGHTS, KAKKANAD,
           ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682030

           BY ADVS.
           SRI.SATHEESH MOHANAN
           SHRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR (SR.)
           SHRI.SREEJITH S. NAIR
           SMT.MAHIMA
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

           STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
           ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031
           SRI.M.C.ASHI, SR.PP

     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 B.A.No. 93 of 2026

                               ..2..

                                                         2026:KER:7940




                           ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS),

seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.853/2025

of Palarivattom Police Station, Ernakulam District. The

offences alleged are punishable under Sections 118(1),

115(2) and 126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is as follows:- The

defacto complainant is the Deputy Manager of Stalwart

People Services India Ltd. engaged in supplying security

service personnel. They are supplying security to the

Confident Group head office at Palarivattam. When a security

guard Jayan P.K., had been working as the security guard at

the head office of Confident Group, on 21.11.2025 morning at

8.45 a.m., the applicant came in a car bearing registration

..3..

2026:KER:7940

number KL-05-BC-5555 and parked on the main entrance of

the building. When the security personnel requested the

applicant to remove the car, he took out an iron rod from the

car and brutally attacked the security guard employed by the

defacto complainant. Later he parked the car in the parking

area of the Confident Group and again assaulted the security

and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Satheesh Mohanan, the learned

counsel for the applicant and Sri. M.C.Ashi, the learned

Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted

that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated

in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no

materials are on record to connect the applicant with the

alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned

Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that

the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's

intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this

..4..

2026:KER:7940

stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The alleged incident took place at the main

entrance of the head office of Confident Group at

Palarivattom, Ernakulam, where the injured was deputed as

the security guard. It is seen from the FIS that there was

some exchange of words followed by altercation between the

injured and the applicant over the parking of his car.

Annexure-2 would show that the applicant has also sustained

injury and he visited Ernakulam Medical Centre on the same

day at 9.37 a.m. The alleged incident was at 8.45 a.m.

Annexures 3 and 4 would show that the applicant and his wife

preferred a complaint against the injured. The injury

sustained by the injured is not serious in nature. The

applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the

allegations made against the applicant, his custodial

interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find

this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the

applicant.

..5..

2026:KER:7940

In the result, the application is allowed on the following

conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event

of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees

One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each

to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer,

as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the

investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed

police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating

officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday

until further orders. He shall also appear before the

investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like

nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of

the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other

..6..

2026:KER:7940

person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence

or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the

investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala

without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of

bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of

violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional

court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE APA

..7..

2026:KER:7940

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 93 OF 2026

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE -1 TRUE COPY OF THE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.

853 OF 2025 OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ANNEXURE -2 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL RECORDS OF THE PETITIONER FROM ERNAKULAM MEDICAL CENTER AND ASTER MEDICITY ANNEXURE -3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 21/11/2025 ANNEXURE -4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE WIFE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 21.11.2025 ANNEXURE- 5 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 858 OF 2025OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ANNEXURE -6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED U/S 35 (3) OF THE BNSS ANNEXURE -7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL. MC NO. 3473 OF 2025 COURT OF SESSIONS(VACATION COURT) ERNAKULAM DIVISION DATED 26.12.2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter