Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1846 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2026
2026:KER:15155
W.P.(C) No.16602 of 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 30TH MAGHA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 16602 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
MATHEW JOHN, AGED 56 YEARS, ANNS,
CHANGANKULANGARA MURI, OACHIRA VILLAGE,
KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM, PIN - 690 518
BY ADVS.
SMT.BHANU THILAK
SHRI.S.R.PRASANTH
RESPONDENTS:
1 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY
PROJECT DIRECTOR NHAI, NO.36/414(III), NEAR NSS
HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALKULANGARA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 024
2 SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA), NH & COMPETENT
AUTHORITY
KOLLAM COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 011
3 SANDHYA C GOPINATH, AGED 34 YEARS, D/O.
SARASWATHY AMMA PUTHENVEEDU, ADINADU NORTH,
ADINADU VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK KOLLAM, PIN
- 690 518
BY ADVS.
SMT.SINDHU SANTHALINGAM
SHRI.A.D.SHAJAN
SHRI.RAJEEV RAJADHANI
2026:KER:15155
W.P.(C) No.16602 of 2023
2
SMT. SYLAJA S.L, G P
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 19.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2026:KER:15155
W.P.(C) No.16602 of 2023
3
JUDGMENT
I have heard Sri.S.R. Prasanth, the learned counsel for
the petitioner, Sri. A.D. Shajan, the learned counsel for the 3 rd
respondent herein, Sri.B.G. Bidan Chandran, the learned
Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent and Smt.Shylaja, the
learned Government Pleader for the 2nd respondent.
2. The petitioner is stated to be the owner of the
property extending to 1.07 Ares in Re.Sy. No.312/4-3 Block
No.3 of Oachira Village, Karunagappally Taluk. The
aforementioned property has been devolved on the petitioner on
the basis of Ext.P1 settlement deed executed by his parents.
With reference to the payment of tax, etc., the petitioner states
that the property is in his rightful possession and enjoyment. A
portion of the property as above was acquired under the
provisions of the National Highways Act, and Ext.P7 award dated
17.09.2021 is also issued by the 2 nd respondent herein.
However, a reading of Ext.P7 shows that though the property
concerned is possessed by the petitioner herein on account of
the pendency of a suit before the Munsiff's Court, 2026:KER:15155
Karunagappally, the 2nd respondent is not in a position to
disburse the compensation amount to the petitioner, and the
afore amount is being deposited in the bank. The order further
states that the afore amount would be paid only after the
conclusion of the civil case. It is seeking to challenge Ext.P7
issued as above that the petitioner is before this Court.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner points
out that the reference to the civil suit pendency pointed out in
Ext.P7 has no connection with the property that is the subject
matter of the award. According to him, the petitioner's parents
have transferred one shop room as well as the adjoining
varanda on the western side of the property to one Koshy Kunj,
pursuant to Ext.P3 sale deed, however, reserving the right over
30 square meters of land for making subsequent constructions.
However, Koshy Kunj, referred to above, transferred the shop
room as well as the varanda along with the 30 square meters to
a 3rd party - the parents of the 3rd respondent herein, and it is in
such circumstances, the petitioner instituted O.S. No.143 of
2020 before the Munsiff's Court, Karunagapally, seeking for an
order restraining the 3rd respondent herein from receiving 2026:KER:15155
compensation with respect to the extend of "30 square meters"
referred to above. The counsel further adds that the Munsiff's
Court, in such circumstances, issued Ext.P6 order dated
17.08.2020, restraining the party respondent herein from
receiving the amount towards compensation as regards the 30
square meters referred to above.
4. In the afore circumstances, it is the submission
of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the property which
is the subject matter of the suit and the property which is the
subject matter of the award being different, there was no
justification for the 2nd respondent herein in not disbursing the
amount of compensation to the petitioner herein. He also
invites the attention of this Court to Ext.P9 representation
submitted before the 2nd respondent herein, pointing out all the
afore aspects.
5. In the representation filed as above, the
petitioner has also pointed out that as regards the 30 square
meters of property, a separate award has also been issued, as
evidenced by Ext.P8 dated 18.09.2021.
6. On a consideration of the contents raised as 2026:KER:15155
above, I am of the opinion that ultimately the 2 nd respondent
needs to have noticed as to whether the property which was the
subject matter of the suit and the property which was the
subject matter of Ext.P7 are one and the same, especially when
a separate award at Ext.P8 has been issued with respect to the
property, which is the subject matter of the suit.
In such circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition
directing the 2nd respondent herein to take note of the
contention raised in Ext.P9 and to pass appropriate orders
thereon, also taking into account the differentiation pointed out
by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,
within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment. Needless to say, the petitioner as well as the
3rd respondent shall be afforded an opportunity of being heard in
the matter.
Sd/-
HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE PR 2026:KER:15155
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 16602 OF 2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.
136/1996 DATED 11-01-1996 EXECUTED BY THE PARENTS OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER DATED 14-02-2020 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED EXECUTED BY THE PARENTS OF THE PETITIONER IN FAVOR OF KOSHI KUNJU, AS PER DEED NO.
3043/1992 DATED 28-09-1992 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE O.S NO. 203 OF 2020 OF THE MUNSIFFS COURT KARUNAGAPPALLY Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S NO.
143/2020 BEFORE THE MUNSIFFS COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17-08-2020 IN I.A NO. 01/2020 IN O.S NO. 143/2020 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE 3(G)(I) ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN A1-559/2021 SANCTIONING THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN DATED 17-09-2021 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE 3(G)(I) ORDER OF THE
SANCTIONING THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT HEREIN DATED 18-09-
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25-10-2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH RECEIPT DATED 25-10-2022 RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit R3(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE CMP NO. 1602/2020 DTD. 1/7/2020 FILED BY MOTHER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, 2026:KER:15155
KARUNAGAPPALLY Exhibit R3(b) A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO. 1798/2020 DTD. 3/7/2020 OF THE OACHIRA POLICE STATION Exhibit R3(c) A TRUE COPY OF THE O S NO. 246/2021 FILED BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS Exhibit R3(d) A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION IN I A NO.
1/2020 IN O S NO. 143/2020 FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND MOTHER BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY Exhibit R3(e) A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.
KL02021103982/2020 DATED 9/6/2020 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE, OACHIRA FOR THE PERIOD 2021 Exhibit R3(f) A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 15/10/2016 ISSUED IN THE NAME OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE OACHIRA VILLAGE AUTHORITIES Exhibit R3(g) A TRUE COPY OF THE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE DATED 17/6/2020 ISSUED IN THE NAME OF 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE OACHIRA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!