Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1305 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2026
2026:KER:10723
W.P. (C) No.21001 of 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 / 17TH MAGHA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 21001 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
MINI.M, AGED 44 YEARS, W/O.MONACHAN, RESIDING AT
KAVUNGAL MELATHIL VEEDU, CHERIYELA, ALUMOODU
P.O, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 577
BY ADVS.
SMT.STIYA SIVAN
SMT.K.R.RENJU
SMT.ASITHA M.M.
SMT.ANILA ANTONY
SMT.KARTHIKA M.R.
SMT.ANJITHA APREM
RESPONDENTS:
1 KERALA BANK (THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
LTD.),
P.B.NO. 6515, COBANK TOWERS, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 95REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PIN - 695 033
2 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA BANK (THE
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.), P.B. NO
6515, COBANK TOWERS, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 033
3 KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK (KERALA BANK),
KANNANALLOOR BRANCH, VALIYAVEEDAN BUILDING,
KANNANALLOOR P.O KOLLAM, PIN - 691 576
4 THE REGIONAL MANAGER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE
2026:KER:10723
W.P. (C) No.21001 of 2023
2
BANK ( KERALA BANK), VADDY- CIVIL STATION ROAD,
OPP.COLLECTORATE, KAANKATHU MUKKU, KOLLAM,
KERALA, PIN - 691 013
5 CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE
BANK (KERALA BANK), KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE
BANK LTD, PB NO.6515, CO BANK TOWERS, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 033
6 REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, JAWAHAR
SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, DPI JUNCTION, THYCARD P.O,
KERALA, PIN - 695 014
7 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
JAWAHAR SAHAKARANA BHAVAN, DPI JUNCTION, THYCARD
P.O, KERALA, PIN - 695 014
BY ADV SHRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
SRI.SUNIL NATH, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 06.02.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2026:KER:10723
W.P. (C) No.21001 of 2023
3
JUDGMENT
I have heard Smt.Stiya Sivan, the learned Counsel for
the petitioner, Sri.P.C. Sasidharan, the learned Counsel for
respondent Nos.1 to 5, and Sri. Sunil Nath, the learned
Government Pleader for respondent Nos.6 and 7.
2. The petitioner admittedly is working as a part-
time sweeper in the 1st respondent - bank. The complaint of
the petitioner is that she was also eligible to be considered for
promotion to the post of Office Attendant. However, when
Ext.P9 provisional list of part-time employees eligible for
promotion to the post of Office Attendant was prepared, the
petitioner's name was not included, even though the names of
persons junior to her in service and those having the same
seniority as the petitioner were included in Ext.P9. The learned
counsel for the petitioner also relies on the Recruitment Rules
of the 1st respondent Bank, produced as Ext.P1, to contend that
the stand taken by the Bank that the petitioner ought to have
furnished an "option form" is without any justification, as the
Recruitment Rules do not specify any such requirement.
3. Per contra, Sri. P.C. Sasidharan, the learned 2026:KER:10723
counsel for the respondent Bank, would invite the attention of
this Court to the provisions of Section 69(1) of the Kerala Co-
operative Societies Act, 1969 (for short, "the Act"), to contend
that the petitioner's remedy lies elsewhere and that this Court
ought not to interfere. He would also place reliance on the
counter affidavit filed, to point out that, along with Ext.P8
Recruitment Rules, the option form prescribed under the
Circular dated 22.02.2022, specifically referred to in paragraph
6 of the counter affidavit, had not been furnished by the
petitioner.
4. I have considered the rival submissions as
well as the connected records.
5. This Court notices that essentially the
complaint of the petitioner is with reference to the seniority of
the petitioner, as against the persons mentioned at Sl.Nos.42
to 58 of Ext.P9, who are stated to be juniors of the petitioner.
In the aforementioned circumstances, in my opinion, the
dispute as regards the entitlement of the petitioner for
promotion with reference to the promotion proposed for her
juniors has to be highlighted before the authority as prescribed
under the provisions of Section 69(1) of the Act. This court 2026:KER:10723
further notices that the bank has a contention to the effect that
the petitioner has not produced the prescribed option with
reference to the Circular issued by the 1 st respondent. In such
circumstances, the question as to whether the Circular has a
binding effect or has an overriding effect on the rules also
requires to be considered by the authority under the provisions
of Section 69(1) of the Act. This Court also takes note of the
Judgments of this Court in P.S. Ravendran v. State of Kerala
and Others [2007(3) KHC 780] as well as Prakasini v.
Joint Registrar [2006 (1) KLT 199], wherein this Court has
categorically found that the disputes in the aforementioned
nature are required to be considered by the authority under
Section 69(1) of the Act.
In such circumstances, I am of the opinion that it is for
the petitioner to approach the authority under Section 69(1) of
the Act. Leaving open the afore remedy to the petitioner, this
writ petition would stand disposed of.
Sd/-
HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE PR 2026:KER:10723
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 21001 OF 2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P-1 A TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED 05/11/2005 ISSUED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD Exhibit P-2 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/08/2008 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN
Exhibit P-3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20/09/2008 ISSUED BY THE THEN DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO- BANK LTD Exhibit P-4 A TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED 26/02/2008 ISSUED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO-BANK LTD Exhibit P-5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09/02/2012 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P
Exhibit P-6 . A TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED 05/03/2014 ISSUED BY GENERAL MANAGER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD Exhibit P-7 A TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED 25/01/2016 ISSUED BY GENERAL MANAGER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD Exhibit P-8 A TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P)NO.
119/2021/CO-OP DATED 02/08/2021 Exhibit P-9 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM NO.
522/2022-23 DATED 29/04/2022 Exhibit P-10 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10/06/2022 IN W.P(C) 16001/2022 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Exhibit P-11 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 01/08/2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P-12 . A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28/10/2022 IN W.P(C) 29031/2022 OF THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT Exhibit P-13 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 29/12/2022 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT 2026:KER:10723
Exhibit P-14 A TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY DATED 18/01/2023 ISSUED BY THE TRAVAN CORE MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL KOLLAM Exhibit P-15 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31/01/2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P-16 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29/05/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN CON
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!