Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10285 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2025
2025:KER:81686
CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 8TH KARTHIKA, 1947
CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
CRIME NO.43/2016 OF Kannur Town Police Station, Kannur
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.479 OF 2021 OF
ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT, KANNUR
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.6:
AMITH C.M,
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O.MADHU, DHANYA HOUSE, CHALAD P.O,
PANNENPARA,ERINJHATHUVAYAL, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN -
670014
BY ADV SMT.V.P.BIJI
RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION ( CRIME NO: 43/2016),
KANNUR, PIN - 670001
3 SANDEEP KUMAR K,
S/O.NANDANAN, KOMBRA HOUSE , CK PURAM, CHALAD P.O.
KANNUR, PIN - 670014
2025:KER:81686
CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
2
BY ADV SMT.K.T.LILLY @ LILLY JAMES
OTHER PRESENT:
SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA S
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.10.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:81686
CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
3
C.S.DIAS, J.
---------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 8232 OF 2025
-----------------------------------------
Dated this the 30th day of October, 2025
ORDER
The petitioner is the 6th accused in S.C.No.479 of
2021 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Court, Kannur,
which has arisen from Crime No.43 of 2016 registered by
the Kannur Town Police Station, alleging the commission
of the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148,
341, 323, 324, 308 and 506(ii) read with Section 149 of
the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent
jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash all
further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that
the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has
been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3 rd 2025:KER:81686 CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
respondent, who has executed Annexure A5 affidavit,
affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel
appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public
Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3 rd
respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits
that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers,
the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The 3 rd
respondent has no subsisting grievance and do not wish
to pursue the prosecution, and has no objection to the
proceedings being quashed.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on
instructions, submits that the Investigating Officer has
reported that the parties have arrived at a genuine and
bona fide settlement. The State has no objection to the
Criminal Miscellaneous case being allowed.
2025:KER:81686 CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
6. The scope and ambit of the inherent
powers of this Court to quash criminal proceedings on the
ground of settlement between the parties have been
authoritatively laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court, in
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303],
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and
Others [(2019) 5 SCC 688], Naushey Ali v. State of U.P.
[(2025) 4 SCC 78], and in a host of judicial
pronouncements. It is held that in cases where the
offences are not grave or heinous, and where the parties
have amicably settled the dispute, to secure the ends of
justice, the High Court may invoke its inherent powers to
quash the proceedings, particularly if continuation of the
prosecution would serve no fruitful purpose.
7. On an overall consideration of the facts
and circumstances of the present case, and the materials
on record, I am satisfied that: the offences alleged are not 2025:KER:81686 CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
heinous or of a serious nature; no public interest or
element of societal concern is involved; the chances of
conviction are remote in view of the settlement; and the
continuation of the proceedings would merely burden the
judicial process without advancing the cause of justice.
Furthermore, the settlement would promote harmony
between the parties and restore peace. Hence, this Court
is persuaded to hold that this is a fit case to exercise its
inherent jurisdiction.
In the result, the Crl. M.C. is allowed. Accordingly,
Annexure A1 FIR, Annexure A3 Final Report and all
further proceedings in S.C.No.479 of 2021 on the file of
the Assistant Sessions Court, Kannur, as against the
petitioner, are hereby quashed.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE dkr 2025:KER:81686 CRL.MC NO. 8232 OF 2025
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure-A1 TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO.
43/2016 OF KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, DATED 4.1.2016 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.S IN CRIME NO.
43/2016 OF KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, DATED 4.1.2016 ALONG WITH TYPED COPY Annexure-A3 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT FILED BY KANNUR TOWN POLICE IN CRIME NO: 43/2016 BEFORE JFCM-1, KANNUR NIL DATED Annexure-A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN SC NO:
478/2017 DATED 27.10.2022 OF ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE, KANNUR Annexure- A5 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 30.8.2025
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!