Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarfas V.A vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 10203 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10203 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2025

Kerala High Court

Sarfas V.A vs State Of Kerala on 28 October, 2025

Author: K. Babu
Bench: K. Babu
B.A. No. 11692 of 2025

                                        1

                                                            2025:KER:80746


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
 TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1947
                         BAIL APPL. NO. 11692 OF 2025
  CRIME NO.115/2024 OF SULTHANBATHERY EXCISE RANGE OFFICE,
                                    WAYANAD
        AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.08.2025 IN BAIL APPL.
NO.8882 OF 2025 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:

              SARFAS V.A
              AGED 25 YEARS, S/O. SALEEM,
              VILANGIL HOUSE, KARUVANCHAL, THALIPARAMBU,
              VELLAD VILLAGE, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670 571.


              BY ADVS.
              SRI.P.C.MUHAMMED NOUSHIQ
              SMT.JAHANA SHERIN.K


RESPONDENT/STATE:

              STATE OF KERALA
              REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
              HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.

              BY ADV
              SRI. M.C.ASHI- PUBLIC PROSECUTOR



       THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.10.2025,        THE     COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 B.A. No. 11692 of 2025

                                   2

                                                      2025:KER:80746




                              ORDER

This is an application seeking regular bail filed

under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

Sanhita, 2023.

2. The petitioner is the accused No.1 in Crime

No.115/2024 of Sulthanbathery Excise Range Office,

Wayanad. The offences alleged against the petitioner is

punishable under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3. The prosecution case as narrated in Annexure

A1 reads thus:-

"On 20.08.2024 at about 12.55 pm, the accused was found in possession of 60.435gm of Methamphetamine while transporting the same in a private bus named 'Orange' bearing Reg.No.AR 02/B 4475 in front of Muthanga Excise Check Post, Thakarappadi Desom, Noolpuzha Vilalge, Sulthan Bathery Taluk, in

2025:KER:80746

contravention to the provisions of the NDPS Act".

4. The petitioner was arrested on 20.08.2024 and

has been in judicial custody since then.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Pubic Prosecutor.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

that the petitioner was produced before the Magistrate

concerned after the expiry of 24 hours. Therefore, there

is violation of his fundamental rights. On this ground, the

learned counsel for the petitioner seeks release of the

petitioner.

7. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that

the petitioner was arrested on 20.08.2024 at 2.15 pm and

was produced before the Court on 21.08.2024 before 2.15

pm.

8. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that

the petitioner was produced before the Court even before

2025:KER:80746

2.15 pm. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted

that the time required for the journey from the place of

arrest to the Magistrate's Court is to be excluded for

reckoning the period of 24 hours. The learned Public

Prosecutor relied on Section 58 of the BNSS and Article

22 of the Constitution of India to contend that the time

necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the

Court is to be excluded.

9. I have gone through the material placed before

the Court. I am of the considered view that the

prosecution could prima facie establish that the petitioner

was produced before the Court after arrest within 24

hours.

10. The petitioner is alleged to have committed

offence in which commercial quantity of contraband is

involved. Therefore, Section 37 (2) of the NDPS Act is

squarely applicable. The petitioner has placed no material

to get over the rider contained the twin conditions

2025:KER:80746

provided in Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The offence

alleged is very grave in nature. Therefore, the petitioner

is not entitled to bail.

Therefore, the Bail application stand dismissed.

Sd/-

K. BABU, JUDGE

S.M.K.

2025:KER:80746

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 11692/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 09.05.2025 IN CRL.M.P. NO. 487 OF 2025 ON THE FILES OF SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS ACT CASES)/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-II, KALPETTA Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.07.2025 IN CRL.M.P. NO. 873 OF 2025 ON THE FILES OF SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS ACT CASES)/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-II, KALPETTA Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.08.2025 IN BA NO. 8882 OF 2025 ON THE FILES OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.08.2025 IN CRL.M.P. NO. 1112 OF 2025 ON THE FILES OF SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS ACT CASES)/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-II, KALPETTA Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 115 OF 2024 OF EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT Annexure A6 TRUE COPY OF THE REMAND PETITION AND 1ST REMAND ORDER IN CRIME NO. 115 OF 2024 OF EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD DISTRICT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter