Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.P.Hajara vs Thrikkaripur Grama Panchayath ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 10465 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10465 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2025

Kerala High Court

A.P.Hajara vs Thrikkaripur Grama Panchayath ... on 4 November, 2025

                                                            2025:KER:83279
W.P.(C). No.36613 of 2022
                                         :1:

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
 TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 / 13TH KARTHIKA, 1947
                            WP(C) NO. 36613 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
              A.P.HAJARA
              AGED 54 YEARS
              ANGILLATH POLLAYIL HOUSE VELLAP, THRIKKARIPUR P.O
              KASARAGOD, PIN - 671310

              BY ADVS. SHRI.M.BAIJU NOEL
              SMT.T.S.LIKHITHA
              SHRI.SHINTO SABASTIAN
              SHRI.ANIL PAUL

RESPONDENTS:
    1     THRIKKARIPUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS
          SECRETARY
          THRIKKARIPUR,KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671310

      2       THE SECRETARY,
              3. THRIKKARIPUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH THRIKKARIPUR,
              KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671310

      3       VILLAGE OFFICER
              NORTH THRIKKARIPUR VILLAGE OFFICE
              THRIKKARIPUR,KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671310

      4       THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
              KANHANGAD,KANHANGAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT,
              PIN - 671531


              BY ADVS. GOVERNMENT PLEADER         ADV. NIMA JACOB
              SHRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
04.11.2025,        THE      COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                    2025:KER:83279
W.P.(C). No.36613 of 2022
                                 :2:

                           VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
         --    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                       W.P.(C) No.36613 of 2022
         --    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
                Dated this the 4th day of November, 2025

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging

Exts.P6, P10, P11 and P12 issued by the respondent Panchayat

and Ext.P13 stop memo issued by the 3 rd respondent Village

Officer.

2. The petitioner has purchased an extent of 2.83 Ares of

land as per Ext.P1. Mutation was effected and tax was paid as

evident from Ext.P2. The petitioner submits that the property is

not included in the data bank, as per the provisions of the Kerala

Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008(hereinafter

referred to as 'the Act, 2008'), as evident from Ext.P4. An

application for building permit was submitted by the petitioner

before the local authority, wherein Ext.P5 permit was granted for

construction of a building having an extent of 119.43 square

metres. The petitioner started construction of the building,

thereupon Ext.P6 stop memo was issued, based on a report of the

Agricultural Officer. Against Ext.P6, Ext.P9 objection was filed by

the petitioner. Thereafter Ext.P10 notice was issued, directing the 2025:KER:83279

petitioner to stop the construction. Later, by Ext.P11, the permit

granted to the petitioner was cancelled based on the report of the

Agricultural Officer. Ext.P13 stop memo was also issued by the 3 rd

respondent Village Officer. The specific case of the petitioner is

that she has purchased the property for the purpose of

undertaking construction of a residential building and that

property was not included in the data bank at the time when she

submitted the application for building permit and the same was

duly granted as per Ext.P5. Later, stop memo was issued based on

the report of the Agricultural Officer. The petitioner relies on

Section 27A(6) of the Act, 2008 and submits that no permission

under the Act, 2008 is necessary for constructing a residential

building having a maximum area of 120 square meters in a

maximum extent of 4.04 ares of land or a commercial building

having a maximum area of 40 square meters in a maximum extent

of 2.02 ares of un-notified land. The property is an un-notified

land. It is in the said circumstances that the petitioner has

approached this Court challenging the stop memo and the order

cancelling the permit.

3. A detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the

respondent Panchayat, wherein it is stated that the stop memos 2025:KER:83279

were issued based on the report of the Agricultural Officer, who is

the Convener of the Local Level Monitoring Committee, stating

that the property is suitable for paddy cultivation and the

petitioner cannot be permitted to undertake construction activity

in the said land and thereupon the stop memos were issued and

after hearing the petitioner, the building permit granted to the

petitioner was cancelled. The learned counsel appearing for the

respondents submits that the petitioner undertook the

construction activity, despite the stop memos issued.

4. Heard the rival contentions on both sides.

5. This Court has granted permission to the petitioner to

undertake the construction at her risk and based on the same the

petitioner has almost completed the construction of the building.

The petitioner would submit that in the case of property of her

son, which is also a property of the same nature, Ext.P17 building

permit was granted and the construction of a commercial building

was completed and an Occupancy Certificate was issued as per

Ext.P18. In answer to the permission granted to the son of the

petitioner the contention raised by the learned Counsel appearing

for the respondent Panchayat is that going by Section 27A of the

Act, 2008, in an area having a maximum extent of 2.02 ares, a 2025:KER:83279

commercial building having an extent of maximum 40 square

meters could be permitted and it is in the said circumstance that

permit was granted. I am of the view that the said stand of the

Panchayat will equally apply to the case of the petitioner also.

Section 27A(6) of the Act, 2008 permits construction of a

residential building having a maximum area of 120 square meters

in a maximum extent of 4.04 ares of un-notified land. The

construction undertaken by the petitioner is a residential building

having only an extent of 119.43 sq. metres and the extent of the

property covered by Ext.P1 is less than 4.04 ares. It is further to

be noted that a perusal of Ext.P11 would reveal that first time the

Agricultural Officer reported to the local authority regarding the

steps taken for inclusion of the said property was on 03.04.2021,

ie., much beyond 16.03.2021, the date on which the permit was

granted.

Taking into consideration the fact that when the building

permit was granted, the property was not included in the data

bank and also Section 27A(6), which permits such construction

without getting necessary permission from the authorities under

the Act, 2008, I am of the view that the impugned orders are liable

to be interfered with. Accordingly, Ext.P6, P10, P11, P12 and P13 2025:KER:83279

are set aside. The petitioner shall undertake construction activity

strictly in accordance with Ext.P5 building permit.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/ 2025:KER:83279

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 36613/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit-P1 THE TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.2446/2018 DATED 11/09/2018 OF THRIKARIPUR SRO Exhibit-P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 08/05/2020 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 SUBMITTED BY THE SON-IN-LAW OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 10.08.2022 Exhibit-P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 AS NO.401125/GGRI12/GENERAL/2022/5268/(1) DATED 27.08.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT NO. SC3-BA(69516)2021 2021 DATED 16/3/2021 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER. NO.

401125/BAUV04/GENERAL/2021/3226/(2) DATED 10.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 27.01.2022 Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NO.RDOKHD/5815//2021-F2 DATED 18.02.2022 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit-P9 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 25.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE FIRST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P10 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.

401125/BAUV01/GENERAL/2021/2971/(1) DATED 08-04-2021 Exhibit-P11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

401125/BAUV04/GENERAL/2021/3226(5) DATED 05.08.2022 2025:KER:83279

Exhibit-P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

401125/BAUV01/GENERAL/2022/7856(1) DATED 08.11.2022 Exhibit-P13 TRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO NO.155/2022/NT DATED 8.11.2022 Exhibit-P14 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTED ON BASIS OF EXHIBIT- P5 Exhibit-P15 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC.NO.12807 OF 2021 DATED 28.06.2021OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA Exhibit -P16 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT NO. KL 14023301968/2025 DATED 21/04/2025 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit -P17 TRUE COPY OF THE SITE APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT NO.SC3-BA (46602)/2025 DATED 06.02.2025 Exhibit -P18 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE NO.

21012130311211 DATED 06.10.2025 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter