Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Krishna Kumar @ Unni vs M/S.Jos Brothers And Valakkuzhy ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 5193 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5193 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2025

Kerala High Court

N.Krishna Kumar @ Unni vs M/S.Jos Brothers And Valakkuzhy ... on 14 March, 2025

                                                        2®25 : KER : 21860
RFA NO.   462 0F 2015
                                    1

          IN THE HIGII CouRT oF' RERAIA AT EEutAKulnM

                                PEtisENI
          THE HONOURABIiE MR.      JUSTICE A.    BADHZLRUDEEN

mlmr, "E i4TH DAr oF mRCH 2o25 / 23RI) pml,Gum, 1946

                        RFA NO.    462 0F 2015

      AGALINST    THE      JUDGRENT      AND   DECREE   DATED   26.06.2014

IN OS NO.220 0F 2010 0F PRINCIPAli SUB COURT, ERNAKuliAM


APPEliliANT/PIAINTIFT:

           N.mlsHNAL KUMAR @ UNNI
           AGED 59 YEARS
           s/o. PUTIIOOR etaRAyANAN NZLIR,
           VRINDAVAN, ULLOOR IiANE, JAGIATHY,
           I-RUM.
           B¥ anvs.
           P.vlswunTmN (SR. )
           StJNIIi N. SHENOI
           A.ITH VISWENATHAN



RESPONDENTS /DEF'ENDANTS :

           M/S. JOS BROTRERS AND VAIAREtJZHY CONSTRUCTIONS
           A PARTNERSHIP FI",
           HAVING ITS OFFICE DOS BROTHERS BUILI)INGS,
           JOSH JUNCTION, KOCHI-16,
           REE'RESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS
           1)SRI.K.J.THOMAS, AGED ABOUT 54,
           s/o.K...TosE, REslDING AT KAlnTHlpRAIOII, HousE,
           ROsE vll,In, AI,AppATT cROss Roan,
           EIAVIE.URAM,     ROCHI-15 ,
           2) SRI . JOSEPH VAIARTUZHY,
           AGED ABOUT 54, S/0.IATE EAEIEN VAILAKKUZHY,
           NOW RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.36/1742,
           SRENor RoaD, KAI,COR, KOCHI-17.

           K . J . THous
           JIGED 54 YEARS
           S/O.K....OSE,
           RESIDING AT KAlnTHlpRjuell, HouSE,
                                                      2025 : KER : 21860
RFA NO.   462 0F 2015
                                    2

           ROsE vlLIA, AIAppATT cROss Roan,
           RAvlEiuRjan, KocHI-15

           JOSEPH VAILAKKUZHY
           AGED 54 YEARS
           S/O. IATE EAPEN VAIAKKUZHY,
           NOW RESII)ING AT HOUSE NO.36/1742,
           SHENOY ROAD, KAIIOOR, KOCHI-17

           K . v . RrmcHZLNDRAIi I DELETED I
           AGED 54 YENS
           BETRON' S TOWERS,      APARTMENT NO.5B,
           BLossoM' s Roan, EIAMKul.AM vll[ILnGE,
           NOW AT P.B.NO.54341, JI.REB AL SHUYUKH,
           KUWAIT .
           RESE.ONDENT NO. 4 IS DELETED FROD4 TEE PARTY ARRAY
           AT THE RISK OF APPELIIANT, AS PER ORDER DATED
           24.02.2025 IN IA NO.1/2025 IN REA NO.462/2015


           BY ADVS.
           SRI.C.S.MANU FOR RI
           BAliRA)4 S A FOR R2 AND R3


      THIS REGulnR FIRST AppRAL HAWING BEEN FINAI.I,I HEziRI)
ON 14.03.2025,   TEE   COURT    0N THE    SAME DAY DEIIIVEREI)     THE
FOI-IiowING :
                                                       2025 : KER : 21860
RFA NO. 462 0F 2015




                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 14th day of March, 2025

This regular first appeal has been filed under Section

96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure,

1908, challenging judgment and decree dated 26,06.2014 in

O.S.No.220/2010 on the files of the Sub Court, Ernakulam.

2. The appellant herein is the plaintiff and the

respondents herein are defendants in the above suit.

3. In this case, the matter has been amicably

settled. Memorandum of agreement dated 28.01.2025

entered into between the parties, has been placed.

4. I have gone through the memorandum of

agreement and the same appears to be one acceptable. In

view of the matter, the compromise is accepted.

5. In view of the above, accepting the

compromise, the decree and judgment under challenge stand

interfered and set aside in terms of the compromise.

                                                          2025 : KER : 21860
REA NO.    462 0F 2015



Accordingly, the regular first appeal stands allowed in terms

of the compromise entered into between the parties.

The memorandum of agreement shall form part of

the appellate decree.

Registry is directed to refund the admissible court

fee paid in this appeal to the appellantrplaintiff, as per law.

All interlocutory orders stand vacated and all

interlocutory applications pending in this appeal stand

dismissed.

Registry is directed to forward a copy of this

judgment to the jurisdictional court forthwith.

Sd/.

A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERAIA AT ERNAKUIAM

R.F.ANo. 462of 2015

APPELLANT:

Krishnakumar @ Unni, aged 70, S/o. Puthoor Narayan Nair. residing at Vrindavan,

UIIoor Lane, Jagathi , Trivandrum, Pin code-695 014.

RESPONDENTS :

1. M/s.Jos Brothers and Valakkuzhy Constructions, A partnership Firm, having its office

Jos Brothers Buildings, Jos Junction, Kochi-16 , represented by its partners 1 ) Sri K.J

Thomas , Aged about 54, S/o K.J jose, Residing at Kalathiparambil House , Rose villa

Alappat Cross Road, Ravipuram, kochi -15. 2) Sri Joseph Valakkuzhy, aged 69, S/o

late Eapen Valakkuzhy , now residing at House No. 36/ 1742, Shenoy Road , Kaloor,

Kochi, Pin code-682 017.

2. Sri K.J Thomas , Aged about 69 ,S/o K.J Jose, residing at Kalathiparambil House,

Rose Villa, Alappat Cross Road, Ravipuram, Kochi, Pin code-682 017.

3. Sri Joseph Valakuzhy, aged 69, s/o late Eapen Valakkuzhy, now residing at House

No. 36/1742, Shenoy Road , Kaloor, Kochi, Pin code-682 017.

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 READ WITH ORDER 23

RULE 3 0F THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.1908

1. The above regular first appeal arises from the judgment and decree

dated 26-06-2024 passed in O.S No.220 of 2011, on the files of the Sub Court,

Ernakulam. The appel[ant herein had filed O.S.No.220 of 2010 seeking recovery of an

amount of Rs.12,64,840-00 with future interest @ 6 % per annum on the principal sum of

--±=,;,-= -i-i:i=---

Rs.7,05,000-00 against the respondents before the Hon'ble Sub-Court, Ernakulam. However, the said suit was dismissed and hence this regular first appeal was filed. It is

submitted that prior to the institution of the aforementioned suit, a criminal case was

registered against the respondents as C.C.No.227 of 2009 under sections 406 and 420

read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code before the Judicial Magistrate Court First

Class-VIll, Ernakulam based on a complaint lodged by the appellant through his wife and

the same was disposed of by convicting the respondents.

It is submitted that the parties have after due deliberation resolved the dispute

on the following terms and conditions:-

(i) Whereas during the pendency of the above appeal, respondents

were found guilty of the charges under sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code in

C.C.No.227 of 2009 before the Judicial Magistrate Court First Class-Vlll, Ernakulam and

the magistrate court directed the respondents 2 and 3 to pay a total amount of

Rs.20,00,000-00 (Rupees twenty lakhs only) to be paid to the appellant, and that

appellant agreed to deduct an amount of Rs.1,00,000-00 (Rupees one lakh only) from

the total amount of Rs.20,00,000-00 (Rupees twenty lakhs only) and thereby reducing

the total amount to Rs.19,00,000-00 (Rupees nineteen lakhs only). It is also hereby

agreed. by the appellant .that the same would be compounded before the Judicial

Magistrate Court First Class-VIll, Ernakulam.

Respondents

•.Qgr

1. M/s. Jose Brothers & Valakuzhy Construction

2Sr'gr

3. Sri.Joseph Valakuzhy

in

(ii) The respondents 2 and 3 had agreed to pay an amount of

Rs.19,00,000-00 (Rupees nineteen lakhs only) by way of a demand draft bearing No.

860887 of lnduslnd Bank dated 14-03-2024 in the name of the appellant. The receipt of

Rs.19,00,OOO-00 (Rupees nineteen lakhs only) by way of a demand draft is hereby

acknowledged by the appellant and agrees that on such payment, the entire liability

stands discharged.

(iii) The appellant hereby agrees to withdraw R.F.A.No.462 of 2015

pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala on the basis of this settlement. The entire

court fees paid by the appellant may be refunded. Hence, it is agreed by all the parties to

dispose of this Regular First Appeal based on the above said terms as settled in

compromise.

Dated this the 28th day of January, 2025.

Respondents

1\Mgrrs&vaiakuzhyconstruct,On

2Sgr #

3.Sri.Josephvalakuz# \-

Counsel for the Respondent No.1

Air.. sh;bc^ 1Toaapte k' 500' `qq5.

forthefre\;PgnQd[ewnat;;?S2.A

COu#eResponkd'::t5::£3°'g.

Atw` e>alrioing ,s4 k(,G58/€C„g-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter