Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Adarsh C.B vs Aswathy Sidharthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 7273 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7273 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

Adarsh C.B vs Aswathy Sidharthan on 27 June, 2025

Author: Devan Ramachandran
Bench: Devan Ramachandran
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                       PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                                          &

              THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA

       FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1947

                             OP (FC) NO. 298 OF 2025

            AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.05.2025 IN IA No.53/2025 IN

            OP(G&W) NO.185 OF 2019 OF FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

             ADARSH C.B., AGED 46 YEARS
             S/O CHANDRA BOSE K., RESIDING AT SANTHI, PADA NORTH,
             KARUNAGAPALLY P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690518

             SMT.UMMUL FIDA
             SRI.C.IJLAL
             SMT.P.PARVATHY
             SHRI.MAJID MUHAMMED K.
             SHRI.ANANDU R.



RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

             ASWATHY SIDHARTHAN, AGED 35 YEARS
             W/O ADARSH C.B., ASWATHY BHAVANAM, KALLELIBHAGOM MURI,
             KALLELIBHAGOM VILLAGE, KALLELIBHAGOM P.O.,
             KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690519

             SMT.SAYUJYA RADHAKRISHNAN
             SHRI.K.R.RAJEEV KRISHNAN



     THIS    OP    (FAMILY    COURT)    HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
27.06.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                       2025:KER:46774

OP (FC) NO. 298 OF 2025

                                  2


                               JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

The petitioner challenges Ext.P15 order of the learned

Family Court, Chavara, through which, he has been given only

interim custody of his eight-year-old son during the daytime and

that too, within the confines of the Court.

2. Smt.Ummul Fida - appearing for the petitioner, today

conceded that the time duration fixed in Ext.P15 order is now over

and that technically, therefore, the matter may have become

infructuous. She, however, contended that the approach of the

learned Family Court, in not allowing overnight custody of the

child to her client and in ordering visitation within its premises, is

both incorrect and contrary to the judgment of this Court in Indu

v. Thomas @ Manoj [2025 (3) KHC 295]. She thus prayed that this

Court directs the learned Family Court, Chavara, to consider any

further applications to be filed by her client seeking interim

custody of the child and for his overnight custody in its proper

perspective, without being fettered by its view in Ext.P15.

3. Smt.Sayujya Radhakrishnan - appearing for the 2025:KER:46774

OP (FC) NO. 298 OF 2025

respondent, submitted that this Original Petition is an abuse of

process because, the plea for overnight custody is not tenable on

account of an earlier judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

SLP No.2437/2023, which has been obtained by the petitioner

himself. She argued that, in any event, since this matter has now

become infructuous, a further declaration by this Court on merits

would be unnecessary; but conceding that the visitation could not

have been arranged within the Court premises, going by Indu

(supra).

4. Before we move on, we record that, in fact, the parties

were present before us along with the child today and we had an

elaborate interaction with them. The child was initially very

reluctant to even talk to the father, much less go to him, but on our

persuasion, he spent over two hours with him within our

Chambers. However, when this matter was called again in the

afternoon, the child was very clear that he wants to go with his

mother and that he does not want to spend time with his father.

5. Since both sides now agree that the time period for

which Ext.P15 order was issued by the learned Family Court has

expired, all we require to verify is whether it was in error in 2025:KER:46774

OP (FC) NO. 298 OF 2025

allowing the child's visitation by the father within its premises. In

Indu (supra), we have declared it unambiguously that, except in

exceptional circumstances and that too for reasons to be recorded,

exchange of any child between the parents ought not to be done

within Court premises. To that extent, we are in favour with the

submissions of Smt.Ummul Fida.

6. In the afore circumstances, noticing that Ext.P15 has

run its course, we refrain from making any further observations on

merits; however, reminding the learned Family Court, Chavara,

not to allow exchange of children or access to them by their

parents within the Court premises as stipulated by us in Indu

(supra).

This Original Petition is thus disposed of.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE stu 2025:KER:46774

OP (FC) NO. 298 OF 2025

APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 298/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF O.P. (G&W) NO. 185/2019 DATED 05.03.2019, FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 04.04.2021, FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN THE ABOVE ORIGINAL PETITION BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2019 IN I.A.NO.458/2019 IN O.P.(G&W) NO.185/2019 OF THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.11.2019 IN I.A. NO. 2018/2019 IN O.P. (G&W) NO.

185/2019 OF THE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 21/02/2022 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND HIS SISTER

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED 09/03/2022 OF THE SHO, KARUNAGAPPALLY

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.08.2022 IN

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 10.11.2022PASSED IN I.A.NO.7/2020 AND I.A.NO.22/2021 IN O.P. (G&W) NO.185/2019 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10/01/2022 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN O.P.(FC)

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03/10/2023 OF 2025:KER:46774

OP (FC) NO. 298 OF 2025

THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN SLP(C)

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER DATED 31/10/2023 OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19/04/2024 IN MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 2614/2023 IN

Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A.NO.53/2025 DATED 03/04/2025 IN O.P.(G&W) NO.185/2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 21/04/2025 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN THE ABOVE OP BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07/05/2025 IN I.A.NO.53/2025 IN O.P. (G&W) NO. 185/2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter