Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1332 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2025
W.A.No.1224 of 2025 1 2025:KER:39384
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.
TH
MONDAY, THE 9
DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 19TH JYAISHTA,
1947
WA NO. 1224 OF 2025
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.03.2025 IN WP(C) NO.36441
OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANTS:
1
R.RAJEEV VIDYADHARAN@ RAJEEV ANCHAL,
M
AGED 63 YEARS
GURUCHANDRIKA, SNEHAPURAM, SANTHIGIRI.P.O.,
KOLIYAKODE VILLAGE, KEEZTHONNAKKAL,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695589
2
ADMAJAN RAJEEV
P
AGED 63 YEARS
12/600 (18/799), GURUCHANDRIKA,SANTHIGIRI.P.O.,
POTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, REPRESENTED
BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER PADMAM RAJEEV,
PIN - 695589
3
ARGI RAJEEV
G
AGED 40 YEARS
GARGI RAJEEV 12/600 (18/799), GURUCHANDRIKA,
SANTHIGIRI.P.O., POTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
KERALA., PIN - 695589
4
ADMAM MAVILAVEEDU SAHADEVAN @ SHAJI RAJEEV
P
AGED 55 YEARS
12/600 (18/799), GURUCHANDRIKA, SANTHIGIRI.P.O.,
W.A.No.1224 of 2025 2 2025:KER:39384
OTHENCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN -
P
695589,
5
/S.GURUCHANDRIKA BUILDERS & PROPERTY (P) LTD.,
M
CIN:U70101KL2010PTC02683, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR.RAJEEV VIDYADHARAN ALIAS
RAJEEV ANCHAL, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
JATAYU EARTH'S CENTER, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM
DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 691534
6
ATAYUPARA ADVENTURE TOURISM (P) LTD.,
J
U63040KL2014PTC035795, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,
GARGI RAJEEV, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
JATAYU EARTH'S CENTER, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM
DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - 691534
7
URUCHANDRIKA STUDIOS PRIVATE LIMITED,
G
CIN:U74999KL2017PTC051110, ANUGRAHAM, T.C.15/601,
PLOT NO.51, UDARASIROMANI ROAD, VELLAYAMBALAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, RAJEEV VIDYADHARAN @ RAJEEV
ANCHAL, PIN - 695010
8
NIQUE CAVES (P) LTD.,
U
CIN:U63040KL2012PTC030706, JATAYU EARTH'S CENTER,
CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, RAJEEV
VIDYADHARAN @ RAJEEV ANCHAL, PIN - 691534
Y ADVS.
B
SRI.SIDHARTH A.MENON
SHRI.V.AJAKUMAR
SMT.VINITHA S.T.
SHRI.M.R.HARIKRISHNAN
SMT.SANDRA ANN T. JOSEPH
W.A.No.1224 of 2025 3 2025:KER:39384
RESPONDENTS:
1 HE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, T KOCHI BENCH, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, COMPANY LAW BHAVAN, BMC ROAD, THRIKKAKARA P.O., KAKKANAD, KOCHI, PIN - 682021
2 .J. MATHEWS, P P.J. MATHEWS, NEDUMCHIRA THOTTATHIL, ADICHANALLOOR.P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691573
3 AVIDSON VATTUPPARAMPIL GEORGE D VATTUPPARAMPIL HOUSE, MAMMOODU.P.O., CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM, KERALA, PIN - 686553
4 ANICKER PRAVEEN RAJ GOPI P PANICKER PRAVEEN RAJ GOPI 7A, ROYAL HEIGHTS, OPPOSITE N.S.S COLLEGE, NF GATE ROAD, TRIPUNITHRA, ERNAKULAM, KERALA, PIN - 682301
5 AYALAL BALARAJAN J KURATHATHUSSERIL HOUSE, PATHIYOOR.P.O BHAGAVATHIPADI, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA, PIN - 690552
6 ENNIS LAVIN NORONHA D B-5, MARVE QUEEN-1, 1ST FLOOR, KHARODI, NEAR JURASSIC PARK RESTAURANT, MARVE ROAD, MALAD WEST, MUMBAI, PIN - 40009
7 ONES MATHEWS J NEDUMCHIRA THOTTATHIL, ADICHANALLOOR.P.O., KOLLAM, PIN - 691573
8 UANITA JOSEPH THODUPARAMBIL J 7/11, ASSISI NAGAR, P.L.LOKHANDE MARG, CHEMBUR, MUMBAI, PIN - 400043
9 ALKUMAR SOMARAJAN L APD NO.5A, CORDIAL CASILDA, KOCHULLOOR, MEDICAL W.A.No.1224 of 2025 4 2025:KER:39384
COLLEGE.P.O., ULLOOR, KERALA, PIN - 695011
10 ATAYUPARA TOURISM (P) LTD. J CIN:U63040KL2014PTC037707, JATAYU EARTH'S CENTER JATAYU JUNCTION, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM, KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. VASU JAYAPRAKASH, PIN - 691534
11 ATAYU SCULPTURE & MUSEUM PRIVATE LIMITED, J U63040KL2014PTC035795, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT JATAYU EARTH'S CENTER, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA . REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MS USHA B PILLAI, PIN - 691534
12 .R.NARAYANAN NAIR P GOKULAM A-18, TENNIS CLUB ENCLAVE, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695003
13 HE STATE OF KERALA T REPRESENTED BY THE, CHIEF SECRETARY ,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
14 4. DIRECTOR, ECO-TOURISM DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM,
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, PARK VIEW, THIRUVANNATHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695033
15 RINCE RAVI P CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT, GSPU & ASSOCIATES, T.C12/1443(2), FIRST FLOOR, SYAM SCION, PMG-LAW COLLEGE ROAD, VIKAS BHAVAN.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033
16 AJEE P.NAIR S SREESANKARAM, FIRST FLOOR, KRA 74 OPP. KAITHAMUKKU.P.O., ATHANILANE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695024
17 AJEEV BHASKARAN R THULASI BHAVAN, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM, KERALA, PIN - 691534 W.A.No.1224 of 2025 5 2025:KER:39384
18 RISHNAN KOODACHERI K SREE KRISHNA HOUSE, CHERUSSERI NAGAR, PALLIKULAM, CHIRAKKAL.P.O., KANNUR ,, PIN - 670001
19 ASU JAYAPRAKASH V ARIYANNOOR HOUSE, KAITHA SOUTH, KANNAMANGALAM, CHETTIKULANGARA, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA KERALA, PIN - 690106
20 JIT KUMAR BALARAMAN A 4B 29 UNITY APARTMENT, BAF HIRA NAGAR, KHARODI MARVE ROAD, NEAR FIRE STATION, MALAD(WEST), MUMBAI M.H, PIN - 400095
21 JAY BALARAMAN A 4B 29 UNITY APARTMENT, BAF HIRA NAGAR, KHARODI MARVE ROAD, NEAR FIRE STATION, MALAD(WEST), MUMBAI M.H, PIN - 400095
22 ARIDAS KRISHNANKUTTY H RARATH HOUSE PERUVEMBA.P.O., PALAKKAD, KERALA, INDIA, PIN - 678531
23 ATHEW PANDAKASALAIL M PANDAKASALA,KAMPAMKODU VAYAKKAL.P.O., VALAKAM, KOLLAM - , KERALA, INDIA,, PIN - 691532
24 . MOHANAN PILLAI C S/O K. CHANDRASEKHARAN PILLAI, KRISHNA PRIYA, PODIYATTUVILA.P.O., VALAKOM, KOLLAM, PIN - 691532
25 HRI M.R BHAT ICLS S HOUSE NO. 1-4, 65/3 STREET NO. 8 LANE, ADJACENT TO MORE SUPERMARKET, HABSIGUDA, TELANGANA, PIN - 500007
26 HRI. SHAWN JEFF CHRISTOPHER S JVR & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS WARRIOM ROAD OPPOSITE ST.GEORGE CHURCH, PALLIMUKKU, KOCHI, KERALA, PIN - 682016 W.A.No.1224 of 2025 6 2025:KER:39384
RI.BIJOY P.PULIPRA - R2 TO R9 S SRI.SANKAR P.PANICKER - R10 SRI.VINODE V.LUKA - R19
HIS T WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.06.2025, THE COURT ON 09.06.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.No.1224 of 2025 7 2025:KER:39384
JUDGMENT
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
Heard on the question of admission.
2.ThepresentwritappealhasbeenfiledunderSection5oftheKerala
High Court Act, 1958, assailing the judgment dated 24.03.2025 passed in
W.P(C)No.36441 of 2024,wherebythelearnedSingleJudgehasdismissed
the writ petition on the ground of maintainability.
3.Thelearnedcounselfortheappellantshadchallengedtheordersof
the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kochi Bench (Exts.P17, P18,
P20 and P23) which virtually modified or reviewed prior NCLT orders
(Exts.P10 and P11) and the order of the Hon'ble Apex Court (Ext.P9), by
directing that the independentChartered Accountantappointedpursuantto
the Apex Court's directions, report to and act under the supervision of the
Administrator whose own appointment was under challenge before the
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (N CLAT). He further submitted
that the impugned orders were passed without hearing the appellants and
allowed respondent No.25 - Administrator to make recommendations W.A.No.1224 of 2025 8 2025:KER:39384
regarding hisownsalaryandtakeoveroperationalcontrolofaGovernment
Project vested contractually in the 5th appellant.
4.ThelearnedcounselfurthersubmittedthatthelearnedSingleJudge
primarilyfailedtoconsiderthattheappellantshadraisedvalidcontentionsof
procedural impropriety, bias and breach of natural justice. Secondly the
NCLT has no power of review under the Companies Act, 2013 and cannot
passordersthatinsubstancemodifyearlierordersunderappeal.Headded
that the learned Single Judge also failed in considering the fact that the
alternativeremedyunderSection421oftheCompaniesActdoesnotbarthe
writjurisdictionwheretheimpugnedordersarewithoutjurisdictionorpassed
in violation of natural justice.
5.Thelearnedcounselfortheappellantsreliedonthejudgmentofthe
ApexCourtinthecaseofRadhaKrishnanIndustriesv.StateofHimachal
Pradesh and Others[(2021)6SCC771],inparagraph27,theApexCourt
haslaiddowntheprinciplesoflawpointingoutcertainexceptionswherethe
Court can entertain a writ petition. The exceptions to the Rule of alternate
remedy arises where (a)thewritpetitionhasbeenfiledfortheenforcement
of a fundamentalrightprotectedbyPartIIIoftheConstitution;(b)therehas
been a violation of the principles of natural justice; (c) the order or W.A.No.1224 of 2025 9 2025:KER:39384
proceedings arewhollywithoutjurisdiction;or(d)theviresofalegislationis
challenged. The learned counsel, therefore, prayed that thelearnedSingle
Judge ought to have entertained the writ petition on merits instead of
relegating the appellants to avail the alternative remedy.
6. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing forthe10threspondent
vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that the orders have been
passedbytheNCLTintheinterestofallconcerned;whereasthewritpetition
has been filed with the malafide intention of covering up all the illegalities
committedbytheappellantsandinanattempttocontinuetheiractions.The
appellants had earlier approached this Court in W.P(C)No.13448 of 2024
which was disposed of recording the submission that the application for
modification has been withdrawn and directed the NCLT to reconsider the
order dated 20.03.2024 after hearing the parties. The appellants thereafter
moved a contempt case against the Administrator and independent
CharteredAccountantallegingthatbyreleasingsalaryandwithdrawingother
amounts, they have violated this Court's direction. The contempt case was
disposed of holding that there is nothing contemptuous and that the
appellants should take up the matter before theNCLT.Thisaspectwasnot
revealed by the appellants, which amounts to suppression of material facts. W.A.No.1224 of 2025 10 2025:KER:39384
7. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
8. Admittedly the appellants had challenged the interimorderpassed
by the NCLT, wherein certain disputed questions of fact have been raised.
ThelearnedSingleJudgewasrightinholdingthattheappellantshavemade
an attempt to suppress material facts. Moreover contention that the
impugned orders amount to review of Exts.P10 and P11 cannot be found
fault with since the Tribunal is vested with the discretiontopassnecessary
orderstoensureproperfunctioningoftheProjecttillthecompanypetitionis
decided.
9.ThelearnedSingleJudgewasrightincomingtotheconclusionthat
the alternative remedy of appeal under Section 420 of the Companies Act
provides for an appeal to NCLAT against the order of NCLT which the
appellants have not availed. However, since we are not entertaining the
present appeal on thegroundofalternativeremedy,itwouldbeappropriate
torelegatetheappellantstoavailtheremedyofappealunderSection421of
the Companies Act before the NCLAT within a period of 15 days from today.
10. In the circumstances, withoutenteringintothemeritsofthecase,
the appellants aregrantedlibertytoapproachtheNCLATinappealwithina
period of 15 days from today. If the appellants approach the Appellate W.A.No.1224 of 2025 11 2025:KER:39384
Tribunal within the aforesaid period, the period of limitation prescribed to
preferanappealtotheAppellateTribunalshallnotcomeinthewayoffiling
the appeal. The learned Appellate Tribunal shall not dismiss the appeal on
the ground of delay and proceed to hear the appeal on merits. It is made
clear that if the appeal is not filed within the afore said period, then the
NCLAT may entertain the appeal subjecttolawoflimitationandproceedto
decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible.
With the afore said direction, the writ appeal stands finally disposed of.
Sd/-
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI JUDGE
Sd/- SYAM KUMAR V.M. JUDGE
MC/3.6
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!