Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saju Jose vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 1295 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1295 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

Saju Jose vs State Of Kerala on 5 June, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024
                                       1


                                                              2025:KER:39510

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

     THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1947

                      WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024

PETITIONER/S:

             SAJU JOSE,AGED 58 YEARS
             S/O.M P JOSE, MULAVARICKAL HOUSE, PRASANNAPURAM,
             CHOWARA P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683571


             BY ADVS.
             SMT.PREEJA V.P.
             SRI.V.P.PRASANTH


RESPONDENT/S:

      1      STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE
             REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

      2      REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,OFFICER OF RDO, K B
             JACOB ROAD,FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682001

      3      THE VILLAGE OFFICER,CHOWARA VILLAGE OFFICE,ALUVA,
             ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683571

      4      THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,SREEMOOLANAGARAM,
             NEDUMBASSERY,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683580
             SR.GP.SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   05.06.2025,   THE   COURT    ON       THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024
                               2


                                                 2025:KER:39510

                         C.S.DIAS, J.
             ---------------------------------------
              WP(C) No. 44009 of 2024
            -----------------------------------------
          Dated this the 5th day of June, 2025

                          JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed to direct the 2 nd

respondent to accept and consider the Form 6 application

proposed to be submitted by the petitioner with respect

to 19.17 Ares of land comprised in Re Survey No.322/3-

11 in Block No.31 of Chowara Village, Aluva Taluk,

Ernakulam District.

2. The petitioner is the owner in possession of

39.59 Ares of land comprised in the above survey number

covered by Ext.P1 settlement deed. The 2 nd respondent is

not accepting the Form 6 application of the petitioner in

respect of 19.17 Ares of land, out of the above total

extent, to change the nature of the petitioner's property

in the revenue records. In fact, the entire extent of the

petitioner's property was classified as 'nilam' in the

revenue records and was included in the data bank. The WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024

2025:KER:39510

petitioner's Form 5 and Form 6 applications in respect of

20.18 Ares were allowed by the respondents and the

petitioner is paying tax in respect of the said extent of

property, as evidenced by Ext.P3 receipt. Subsequently,

the petitioner's Form 5 application in respect of the

remaining 19.17 Ares of property was also allowed by

Ext.P4 order. After that, the petitioner attempted to

upload the Form 6 application in respect of 19.17 Ares of

land, but the system has rejected the application with an

endorsement that "Update failed. Already this Form type

approved for this survey number. No need to apply for

the same". The rejection of the petitioner's Form 6

application is illegal and arbitrary. Hence, the writ

petition.

3. The 2nd respondent has filed a statement, inter

alia, stating that the petitioner is the owner of 39.59 Ares

of land (approximately 98 cents of land) comprised in the

above survey number. The petitioner ought to have filed a

single Form 5 application in respect of the whole WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024

2025:KER:39510

property, to remove the property from the data bank, and

after the application was allowed, filed a Form 7

application, to change the nature of the property in the

revenue records. Instead, in order to evade the setting

apart of 10% of the total extent of land for water

conservation measures, the petitioner has deliberately

filed the Form 6 application separately. The said

procedure cannot be permitted because it would defeat

the benevolent purpose behind Section 27A read with

Rule 12 of the Kerala Conservation of the Paddy Land and

Wetland Act, 2008 and the Rules ('Act' and 'Rules', in

short). The system has rightly rejected the petitioner's

application.

4. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner

submitted that, the petitioner is ready and willing to set

apart 10% of the total extent of 39.59 Ares for the water

conservancy measures as enjoined in the Act and the WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024

2025:KER:39510

Rules.

6. The learned Government Pleader, on

instructions submitted that, the petitioner's online

application will be accepted by the 2nd respondent, as a

special case, subject to the condition that the petitioner

files an undertaking before the 2 nd respondent that he is

willing to set apart 10% of 39.59 Ares for the water

conservancy measures. But, this case shall not be treated

as a precedent.

On a consideration of the facts and materials on

record and the undertaking made by the petitioner before

this Court, I dispose of the writ petition by directing the

2nd respondent to accept the petitioner's Form 6 online

application, subject to the condition that the petitioner

files an undertaking before the 2nd respondent along with

a copy of this judgment, that 10% of the total extent of

39.59 Ares shall be set apart for the water conservancy

measures as envisaged under the Act and Rules. If such

undertaking is filed, the 2nd respondent shall accept and WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024

2025:KER:39510

consider the online application, in accordance with law

and as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within sixty

days from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment

along with the undertaking. It is made clear that, this

judgment is passed in the peculiar facts and

circumstances of this particular case and shall not be

treated as a precedent, especially because the online

submission of applications have been implemented.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

SD/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

rkc/05.06.25 WP(C) NO. 44009 OF 2024

2025:KER:39510

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 44009/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLHEMENT DEED NO:

1519/1/2016 OF SRO SREEMOOLANAGARAM DATED 30.06.2016 EXECUTED BY THE MOTHER OF THE PETITIONER ALICE Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO: 5502 /2023 DATED 26.03.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO:

KLO7040304249/2024 DATED 24.08.2024 ISSUED BY THE 3 RESPONDENT VILLAGE OFFICER Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION DATED 05.03.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO:

RDOCHN/686/2024-K7/K-DIS DATED 29.05.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE SCREEN SHOT OF THE COMPUTER SCREEN DATED 24.10.2024 WHICH SHOWS THE ENDORSEMENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter