Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Aswin Mathew vs Dr. Teenu Mary John
2025 Latest Caselaw 1199 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1199 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 June, 2025

Kerala High Court

Dr. Aswin Mathew vs Dr. Teenu Mary John on 4 June, 2025

Author: Devan Ramachandran
Bench: Devan Ramachandran
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                                       &

                THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA

        WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1947

                         MAT.APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2025

      AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 23.11.2024 IN OP NO.362 OF 2021

OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA


APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:

             DR. ASWIN MATHEW
             AGED 30 YEARS
             S/O SHAJI MATHEW KADAVIL, KADAVIL HOUSE, MANJADI P.O.,
             THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689105


             BY ADVS.
             SHRI.R.SANJITH
             SMT.C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH
             SHRI.ALEX JOHN PULIMOOD




RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:

             DR. TEENU MARY JOHN
             AGED 36 YEARS
             D/O SAJINI JOHN, MELOOTTU HOUSE, PULAMON P.O., KOTTARAKKARA,
             PIN - 691531


             BY ADVS.
             SRI.S.S.ARAVIND
             SHRI.TINU ABRAHAM



     THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.06.2025,
ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.119/2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 Mat.Appeal.Nos.119 & 120 of 2025
                                        2

                                                           2025:KER:39348


                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                    PRESENT

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                                        &

               THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA

       WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1947

                          MAT.APPEAL NO. 119 OF 2025

       AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 23.11.2024 IN OP NO.405 OF

2021 OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVALLA


APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

             DR. ASWIN MATHEW
             AGED 35 YEARS
             S/O SHAJI MATHEW KADAVIL, KADAVIL HOUSE, MANJADI P.O.,
             THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689105


             BY ADVS.
             SHRI.R.SANJITH
             SMT.C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH
             SHRI.ALEX JOHN PULIMOOD


RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

             DR. TEENU MARY JOHN
             AGED 34 YEARS
             D/O JOHN JOSEPH, MELOOTTU HOUSE, PULAMON P.O.,
             KOTTARAKKARA, PIN - 691531


             BY ADVS.
             SRI.S.S.ARAVIND
             SHRI.TINU ABRAHAM


      THIS     MATRIMONIAL     APPEAL   HAVING   BEEN   FINALLY   HEARD   ON
04.06.2025, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.120/2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 Mat.Appeal.Nos.119 & 120 of 2025
                                      3

                                                       2025:KER:39348

           DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & M.B.SNEHALATHA, JJ.
                 -------------------------------------------
                Mat.Appeal Nos.119 & 120 of 2025
                  -------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 4th day of June, 2025

                                   JUDGMENT

M.B.Snehalatha, J

When these appeals came up for hearing today, the learned

counsel appearing for both sides submitted that all the disputes

between the parties have been settled in the mediation held under

the aegis of Ernakulam Mediation Centre and a memorandum of

settlement has been filed before this Court.

2. We have examined the memorandum of settlement, and we

notice that it has been signed by the parties and subscribed by their

counsel. The terms of the settlement are lawful and therefore, the

settlement arrived at by the parties is accepted.

3. In view of the settlement arrived at by the parties, the

Mat.Appeal.Nos.119/2025 and 120/2025 are disposed of as follows.

i) The impugned judgment and decree of Family Court

Thiruvalla in OP.Nos.362/2021 and 405/2021 stand set aside. The

parties shall file a joint petition seeking divorce by mutual consent

under Section 10 A of Indian Divorce Act on or before 15.06.2025 as Mat.Appeal.Nos.119 & 120 of 2025

2025:KER:39348

agreed to in clause (2) of the memorandum of agreement

ii) The appellant shall pay an amount of Rs.32,85,000/- to the

respondent herein in full and final settlement of all her claims

towards compensation and the amount gifted at the time of marriage

and she has no further claim towards past, present and future

maintenance. The said amount shall be given on the date of taking

final deposition in mutual Divorce OP, as agreed to in clause (3) of

the memorandum of agreement.

iii) The appellant shall pay an amount of Rs.35,000/- towards

the value of fridge gifted at the time of marriage as agreed to in

clause (3) of the memorandum of agreement.

iv) The appellant shall hand over the Fixed Deposit Receipt of

Rs.5,00,000/- which is deposited by the respondent's father in the

name of respondent at Union Bank (old Corporation Bank) on the

date of giving final deposition in mutual Divorce OP, as agreed to in

clause (4) of the memorandum of agreement.

v) It is recorded that the parties herein have checked and

confirmed the gold ornaments of the respondent herein kept in the

joint locker at South Indian Bank, Thiruvalla Branch on 14.05.2025,

the details of which are given in the terms of settlement filed before Mat.Appeal.Nos.119 & 120 of 2025

2025:KER:39348

this Court and respondent is entitled to take all the gold ornaments

kept in the said locker and appellant further agrees to relinquish his

rights over the locker enabling the respondent to use it and the

money deposited for locker can be withdrawn by the respondent as

agreed to in clause (6) of the memorandum of agreement.

vi) The appellant shall return one gold bangle of 11.6 gms

weight which is given to his mother at the time of marriage by

respondent and it shall be returned on the date of giving final

deposition in mutual petition for divorce as agreed to in clause (7) of

the memorandum of agreement.

The parties are directed to act implicitly in terms of the

memorandum of agreement, which do form part of the judgment.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

M.B.SNEHALATHA JUDGE Mms BEFOF`E THE HONOUF`ABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Dr.A6win Mathew Appellant

Dr.Teenu Mary John Respondent

FLEPORT Sl HE MEDIATOR

ADV.K.M.MUHAMMED YUSUFF

Mediated, matter is settled.

Terms and conditions are attached herewith.

Dated thEs the 24th day of May, 2025.

Adv. K.M,ndhammed Yusuff Mediator Ernakulam Mediation Centre BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF I(ERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Dr.Aswin Mathew Appellant

Dr.Teenu Mary John Respondent

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 0F THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24 a 25 0F THE CIVIL PROCEDURE {AL:TERNATIVE DISPuTE RESOLUTION),F`uLES, 2008:

The Appellant and respondent are legally wedded couple, whose marriage was solemnised as per Christian religious rites and customs on 12/05#019 at St.George Orthodox Church, Paliakkara, Thiruvalla.

Whereas relationship of the parties hereto had got strained and living separately since 01/01/2021 and

Whereas the parties deserve to establish and define their respective rights and obligations by means of this Memorandum of settlement and a petition for mutual divorce to be filed before the Family Court, Thiruvalla to bring this agreement into effect.

Now in consideration of the promises and undertaking contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows:-

1. The parties have come to the settlement with free consent and without being influenced by fraud, coercion or undue influence.

        AppehawEL                                   Respondent           9fr
        Dr.Aswin Mathew                             Dr.Teenu Mary John




EE




2. The parties are not willing to live together and thereforie they have mutually agreed that their marriage should be dissolved on mutual consent and a petition is to be filed u/s 10 A of Indian Divorce Act on or before 15/06„025.

3. All the claims and disputes between the parties are fully settled for a total amount of Rs.32,85,000/- (Rupees Thirty two lakhs eight five thousand only) to be paid by the appellant herein to the respondent herein towards compensation and amount gifted at the time of marriage and Rs.35,000/-

(Rupees Thirty five thousand only) towards the value of fridge gifted at the time of marriage whicli will be given on the date of taking final deposition in mutual Divorce OP.

4. The Appellant herein further agrees that he will handover the Fixed Deposit Receipt of Rs.5,00,000/-(Rupees Five lakhs only) which is deposited by the respondent's father in the name of respondent at Union Bank (old Corporation Bank) on the date of giving final deposition in mutual Divorce OP.

5, The parties herein have checked and confirmed the gold ornaments of the respondent herein kept in the joint locker at South Indian Bank, Thiruvalla Branch on 14/05/2025, the details of which are given below:-

     AppehaMdr                                 RIespondent           fry
     Dr.Aswin Mathew                           Dr.Teenu Mary John
 Sl.N®,                     I.rtlculers                    Grams                                        Wlth

  1.                    Show Cha]n Broad                     83.59                                    hiker

  2       Show slngle small necklace with red stone        27.520                                     her
.3                      Small slngle chaln                 16.150                                     Locker


  4         Small chaln wlth one soverelgn locket              23.8                                   utter

  5                   Lock chain With Ctoss                   43.2                                    LJ)¢teF


  6                   Lack chaln with clt)ss               27.490                                     Locker


  7                      Bangle plriyan                    1) 9.702)10.00                             Locker




  8             Bangle with whlte gold design         i) 11.4802)11.6103)11.goo4)11.540               Locker




  9                       Broad bangle                  1) 24.00                                      Lacier

                         zlg zao desl9n                 2) 24.00




 10                       Broad bangle                      22.GOO                                    LJ'Cker


 11                           Rlnos                       1) 1.702)4.00                               L®cker




 12                Earings with whlte stone                   e.670                                   LJ,Cker



 13                   RIng wlth white stone                   2.700                        Wlth Teenu's possesslon


 14      wedding ring                                           7.90                      With teenu's possession


 |S      Mlnnu chaJn with mlnnu                             21.520                        Wlth Teenu's pessesslon

 16      two bangle curve deslgn exchanged to one           20.690                        Wltli teenu's possesslon
         tonole

 17      One bangle                                         11.680                        With Aswln's mother




       D::::ELewEL                                    Drm::::oMnad;::hnjdr


6      The parties herein agree that on the date of giving deposition before the
Family Court, Thiruvalla in the mutual divorce petition,           both appellant and

iiespondent shall go to the Bank and respondent can take all the gold ornaments kept in the locker and appellant further agrees to relinquish his rights over the locker enabling the riespondent to use it and the money deposited for locker can be withdrawn by the riespondent.

7. The appellant agrees to return one gold bangle of 11.6 gins weight which is given to his mother at the time of marriage by respondent. The same also shall be returned on the date of giving final deposition in mutual petition for divorce.

8. The respondent hereby agrees that having agreed to receive Rs.32,85,OOO/- (Rupees Thirty two lakhs eight five thousand only) towards compensation from the appellant, respondent agreed that she shall not have any further claim toward past, present and future maintenance.

9. In pursuance of the settlement arrived at between the parties hereto both agree that under any/no circumstances either party or any one on their behalf shall resoit to any further litigation regarding this matrimonial tie.

10, ln the event of non performing the part of obligation as agreed at between the parties hereto, the other party is entitled to proceed against the defaulting party in accordance with law.

Dated this the 24th day of May, 2025.

                          Mtr                                F`espondent

                                                          Dr.Teenu Mary   lJfr
                             fa.pr.QA                               ~ S.S. A`R;.P!_N^D
                                                                           qalD\aooq
                       ±TilfD'j'?aon:3
          Counsel for the App                       Counsel for t e Respondent


Thissettlement::::;Thean:::dut*esn£C:::a(:yedTae:fr~

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter