Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shabeer V.C vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 2866 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2866 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2025

Kerala High Court

Shabeer V.C vs State Of Kerala on 24 January, 2025

                                                         2025:KER:5651
B.A.No.956/2025​    ​     ​    ​     1
​
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH

      FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 4TH MAGHA, 1946

                        BAIL APPL. NO. 956 OF 2025

    CRIME NO.764/2024 OF Sreekandapuram Police Station, Kannur

JUDGMENT DATED 09.12.2024 IN Bail Appl.No.10076 OF 2024 OF

HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

              SHABEER V.C​
              AGED 42 YEARS​
              S/O. ABDUL RAHMAN, VARAMBU MURIYAN CHAPPAYIL, ADUKKAM,
              CHENGALAYI, KANNUR, KERALA, PIN - 670631


              BY ADVS. ​
              K.N.ABHILASH​
              SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT


RESPONDENT/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

       1      STATE OF KERALA​
              REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
              PIN - 682031

       2      STATION HOUSE OFFICER​
              SREEKANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN -
              670631

              SRI.NOUSHAD.K.A, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24.01.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                           2025:KER:5651
B.A.No.956/2025​   ​   ​     ​     2
​
                                 ORDER

​ The accused in Crime No.764/2024 of Sreekandapuram Police

Station in Kannur District has filed this petition under Section 483 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for regular bail.

​ 2.​ The prosecution case is that on 28.11.2024 at about 2:30

p.m, the petitioner was found to have been in possession of 2.2 gms of

MDMA at his house at the place called Adukkam. The offence is said

to have been detected by the S.I of Police, Sreekandapuram and his

team, consequent to a search conducted at the house of the petitioner.

Though the petitioner was apprehended from his house at that time,

he allegedly managed to escape from the custody after pushing away

the police personnel and taking to his heels. The police team claims to

have recovered 2.2 gms of MDMA and 35 packets containing zip locked

covers used for keeping narcotic drugs. The prosecution would further

allege that the mother of the petitioner obstructed the police personnel

to pave the way of escape of the petitioner. However, the petitioner

allegedly got injured while jumping over the compound wall of the

house, and was found lying with injuries. He was taken to the hospital

by the police and given treatment for the fracture of right femur.

2025:KER:5651

​ ​ 3.​ The petitioner filed B.A.No.10076/2024 before this Court

for pre-arrest bail. The above bail application was disposed of on

09.12.2024 with the direction to the petitioner to surrender before the

Investigating Officer within two weeks. Thereafter, the petitioner was

arrested on 10.12.2024 and remanded to judicial custody.

4.​ In the present petition, the petitioner would contend that

he is totally innocent and that he has been falsely implicated in this

case.

5.​ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

6.​ The bail application is strongly opposed by the learned

Public Prosecutor by pointing out the involvement of the petitioner in

another crime relating to the commission of the offence under Section

22(b) of the NDPS Act within the limits of Thrikkakkara Police Station

in the year 2021. It is also submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor

that the petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1287/2018 of

Sreekandapuram Police Station in connection with the commission of

rape and POCSO offences.

7.​ The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that there

are dubious circumstances relating to the detection of the offence and 2025:KER:5651

​ the events which resulted in the petitioner suffering serious injuries on

the same day. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

indications in medical records relating to the treatment given to the

petitioner would go to show that he was brought to the hospital from

police custody. However, it is contended that the case projected by

the prosecution is that the petitioner managed to escape from custody.

Referring to Annexure-A4 F.I.R registered against the petitioner and his

mother for the commission of offence under Sections 262 and 263

read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the learned

counsel pointed out that the case put forward by the prosecution in

the above F.I.R cannot be reconciled with the case projected in the

present crime.

8.​ The above reason stated by the learned counsel for the

petitioner cannot be taken into account for adopting a lenient view in

the matter of bail sought for by the petitioner. At the outset, it has to

be stated that there are no strange or suspicious circumstances in the

case of the prosecution about the escape of the petitioner from police

custody immediately after his apprehension. According to the

prosecution, the petitioner has been brought to the hospital by the

police after he was found lying injured consequent to his attempt to 2025:KER:5651

​ escape by jumping down from a wall. There is nothing unusual in the

indications in the hospital records that the petitioner was brought to

the hospital by the police. The whole incidents which eventually

resulted in the petitioner sustaining fracture to his right leg are stated

in the report submitted by the Investigating Officer on this bail matter.

At any rate, the petitioner cannot canvas the above events as a ground

to get released on bail. Having regard to the involvement of the

petitioner in earlier crimes, including offences under the NDPS Act and

POCSO Act, it is of no doubt that the release of the petitioner on bail

at this stage would not be in the interests of justice. The chances of

the petitioner absconding and involving in further crimes cannot be

ruled out. So also, the release of the petitioner on bail is likely to

affect the investigation in this case which is still in progress.

Therefore, I am of the view that the prayer in this petition for regular

bail cannot be allowed.

In the result, the petition is hereby dismissed.

                   ​      ​   ​     ​              (sd/-)
                                            G. GIRISH, JUDGE
jsr
                                                        2025:KER:5651

​

                   APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 956/2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1                THE TRUE COPY OF FIR NO. 764/2024 DATED

29.11.2024 OF SREEKANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT

Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, KANNUR, DATED 02.12.2024

Annexure A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 03.12.2024 ISSUED BY HIGHLAND HOSPITAL RESEARCH & DIAGNOSTIC CENTRE, MANGALORE

Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF FIR NO. 765/2024 DATED 29.11.2024 OF SREEKANDAPURAM POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT

Annexure A5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter