Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mumtaz Shumsuddin vs Greater Cochin Development Authority
2025 Latest Caselaw 4116 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4116 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2025

Kerala High Court

Mumtaz Shumsuddin vs Greater Cochin Development Authority on 17 February, 2025

                                 1

W.P.(C) No.25940 of 2019

                                                        2025:KER:12974

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON

    MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 / 28TH MAGHA, 1946

                           WP(C) NO. 25940 OF 2019

PETITIONER:

               MUMTAZ SHUMSUDDIN
               18/553 C, ALANGAD PANCHAYAT,
               VARAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM - 683 517
               (PREVIOUSLY RESIDING AT 8 D J M MANOR,
               KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682 017.)

               BY ADV.
               SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC

RESPONDENTS:

1              GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
               REP. BY THE SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE GREATER
               COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KADAVANTHRA,
               KOCHI - 682 020.
2              ESTATE OFFICER
               GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE,
               KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI - 682 020.

               BY ADV.
               SRI.VIPIN P.VARGHESE



       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 17.02.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                2

W.P.(C) No.25940 of 2019

                                                           2025:KER:12974

                    HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.
            ------------------------------
                    W.P.(C) No.25940 of 2019
            ------------------------------
             Dated this the 17th day of February, 2025

                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner is stated to be a tenant with respect to shop

room No.B-1 of the Manappattiparambu shopping complex under

the respondents herein. The petitioner contends that, on the basis

of the alleged arrears of rent, proceedings were taken, leading to

Ext.P11, by which the property was sealed, and steps were taken

for auctioning the merchandise which is inside the shop room. It

is in such circumstances that the petitioner has filed the captioned

writ petition.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

Sri.Vipin P.Varghese, the learned Standing Counsel for the

respondent Corporation.

3. The short issue arising for consideration is with

reference to the legality of the proceedings taken pursuant to

Ext.P11.

4. The essential allegation against the petitioner is as

regards the arrears of rent payable with respect to the shop room

2025:KER:12974

in question. Sri.Vipin, the learned Standing Counsel for the

respondent Corporation, would rely on Ext.R1(s) to contend that

whatever amounts paid by the petitioner have been credited, and

it is even thereafter, the petitioner is seen to be in arrears, as

evidenced by the said document. On a prima facie verification of

Ext.R1(s), this Court notices that the petitioner is in arrears.

However, the learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that

substantial payments are still lying uncredited in the form of

advance, etc. and in such circumstances, the arrears shown in

Ext.R1(s) do not reflect the correct position.

5. This Court notices that, with respect to the property in

question, the provisions of the Kerala Public Buildings (Eviction of

Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1968 ('the Act' for short) are

applicable, is not in dispute. In such circumstances, this Court

clarifies that the respondent would comply with the procedure

prescribed by the afore statute, while taking steps to evict the

petitioner as above.

6. Sri.Vipin, the learned Standing Counsel for the

respondent Corporation, also accepts the requirement to follow

the procedure as prescribed under the said statute. However, he

adds that required steps were taken, as detailed in the counter

2025:KER:12974

affidavit.

In such circumstances, this writ petition would stand

disposed of as under;

i. The respondent Corporation to comply with the

provisions of the Act, while evicting the petitioner

from the property in question.

ii. The petitioner to file an appropriate representation

before the respondent Corporation, giving the

details of the amounts which are allegedly not

credited to the rent arrears, within a period of three

weeks from today.

iii. If such a representation is being filed, the

respondent Corporation to consider and dispose of

the same after hearing the petitioner, within a

further period of three weeks thereafter.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE anm

2025:KER:12974

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25940/2019

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ALLOTMENT ORDER DATED 06/10/2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT DATED 21/10/2015.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT DATED 29/10/2015 AND 23/12/2015.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT PREPARED IN STAMP DATED 07/11/2015.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR ON LINE REGISTRATION ISSUED BY ERNAKULAM SRO ON 25/01/2016.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT DATED 10/08/2017.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 22/11/2018 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT RECEIVED ON 29/12/2018.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST LETTER DATED 16/01/2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06/06/2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 28/06/2019.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 29/08/2019 ISSUED ON 26/09/2019.

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 27/09/2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R1(a) TRUE COPY OF RESOLUTION NO.113/2015-16 DATED 18.08.2015 EXHIBIT R1(b) TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.2840/B-2/ESTATE/ 2015/GCDA DATED 09.11.2015

2025:KER:12974

EXHIBIT R1(c) TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO.2840/ESTATE/B2/ 2015/GCDA DATED 09.02.2017 EXHIBIT R1(d) TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 29.03.2017 EXHIBIT R1(e) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 24.06.2017 EXHIBIT R1(e)(i) TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 11.08.2017 EXHIBIT R1(f) TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 29.08.2017 EXHIBIT R1(g) TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 04.12.2017 EXHIBIT R1(h) TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 21.03.2018 EXHIBIT R1(i) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07.07.2018 EXHIBIT R1(j) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.11.2018 EXHIBIT R1(k) TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 14.02.2019 EXHIBIT R1(l) TRUE COPY NOTICE DATED 29.04.2019 EXHIBIT R1(m) TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 29.08.2019 EXHIBIT R1(n) THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19.06.2017 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT R1(o) THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.09.2018 ISSUED BY PETITIONER EXHIBIT R1(p) THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

2840/ESTATE/B-2/2015/GCDA DATED 20.01.2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT EXHIBIT R1(q) THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF RENT DUE FROM THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT R1(r) THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 16.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT R1(s) THE TRUE COPY OF THE UPDATED STATEMENT OF RENT DUE FROM PETITIONER

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter