Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12616 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 December, 2025
2025:KER:98878
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025/5TH POUSHA, 1947
WP(C) NO. 47079 OF 2025
PETITIONER:
RENJITH.R,
AGED 37 YEARS, S/O RAVEENDRAN,
CHATHERIL, VADAKKEKKARA KIZHAKKU, PALLIPPAD,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690512
BY ADVS.
SMT.A.SALINI LAL
SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR
SHRI.JINU P. BINU
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
ALAPPUZHA, COLLECTORATE,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690001
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
MANNAR POLICE STATION,
ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 689622
*3 DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,
DISTRICT OFFICE MINING & GEOLOGY ALAPPUZHA,
KODATHIKAVALA, CHERTHALA, 688524
*(IS IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL 3RD RESPONDENT AS PER THE
ORDER DATED 26.12.2025 IN WP(C) NO.47079 OF 2025)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.12.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 47079 OF 2025
2
2025:KER:98878
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of December, 2025
Petitioner is the owner of a tipper lorry bearing
registration No: KL-29 P 1754. Petitioner's empty vehicle was
plying through Chennithala-Chengannur road on 10/12/2025,
when the vehicle reached near Ulunthi junction, the 2nd
respondent seized the vehicle alleging that the petitioner has
unloaded ordinary earth in the property (Purayidom) of one
Sunil Kumar.
2. The 2nd respondent seized the vehicle alleging
violation of Kerala Conservation of Paddy and Wetland Act and
forwarded a report to the 1st respondent. No copy of the report
was served on the petitioner. The allegation of the 2 nd
respondent will not lie since the property is purayidom as per
Exhibit P2. Moreover the vehicle was seized in an empty
condition. The 2nd respondent cannot seize the vehicle on a
mere apprehension, as held by this court in W.P(C) No.
19010/2022 dated 24/06/2022. Hence the seizure is illegal and WP(C) NO. 47079 OF 2025
2025:KER:98878
liable to be set aside, contends the petitioner.
3. Heard, the learned Counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Government Pleader.
Considering the facts of the case, the writ petition is
disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to forward seizure
mahazar and other requisite reports to the District Geologist
forthwith. If the petitioner makes an application before the
additional 3rd respondent-District Geologist for compounding the
offence, the additional 3rd respondent-District Geologist shall
pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible
and at any rate within a period of two weeks.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE
ARK WP(C) NO. 47079 OF 2025
2025:KER:98878
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 47079 OF 2025
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF VEHICLE NUMBER KL-29 P 1754
EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 6/8/25
EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE THANDARPER ACCOUNT OF PROPERTY IN SY NO: 273/17 OF ENNACKAD VILLAGE
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C) NO: 19010/2022 DATED 24/6/22
EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 10.12.2025
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!