Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sgs Agro Farms Ltd vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 11748 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11748 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2025

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sgs Agro Farms Ltd vs State Of Kerala on 10 December, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
                                                         2025:KER:95019
CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025              1


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

 WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA,

                                  1947

                        CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025

  CRIME NO.1436/2020 OF Town West Police Station, Thrissur

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.70 OF 2021 OF

SPECIAL    COURT   OF    ADDITIONAL       CHIEF   JUDICIAL   MAGISTRATE,

THRISSUR FOR THE TRIAL OF CASES UNDER THE PRIZE CHITS AND

MONEY CIRCULATION SCHEME (BANNING) ACT, 1978

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 8 :

    1       SGS AGRO FARMS LTD,
            REPRESENTED ITS CHAIRMAN, S.G.SEKAR, 59,1STFLOOR,
            2ND STREET,SECRETARIAT COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI,
            PIN - 600010

    2       S.G.SEKAR,
            AGED 65 YEARS
            S/O.P.SUBBUNADAR, 4, SECOND CROSS STREET, SYLVAN
            LODGE COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

    3       G.SATISHDAS,
            AGED 40 YEARS
            S/O.S.G.SEKAR, 4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
            COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

    4       G.SHANTHI,
            AGED 59 YEARS
            W/O.S.G.SEKAR, 4,SECOND CROSS STREET, SYLVAN LODGE
            COLONY,KELLEYS, CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

    5       G.SANDEEP DAS,
            AGED 34 YEARS
                                                          2025:KER:95019
CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025              2


          S/O.S.G.SEKAR, 4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
          COLONY,KELLEYS,CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

     6    S.FAUSTINA,
          AGED 35 YEARS
          W/O.G.SATISHDAS,4,SECOND CROSS STREET,SYLVAN LODGE
          COLONY,KELLEYS,CHENNAI, PIN - 600010

     7    RAJAKUMAR GANASEKAR,
          AGED 38 YEARS
          S/O.GANASEKAR, 1-3,GROUND FLOOR, BHARATH
          FLATS,R.V. NAGAR EAST NEAR J.JAYALALITHA BASKET
          BALL INDOOR STADIUM ANNA NAGAR EAST, CHENNAI,
          TAMIL NADU, PIN - 600012

     8    ROBIN VIJAYKUMAR,
          AGED 36 YEARS
          S/O.GANGA SUNDARAM,294,PURASAWAKKAM,HIGH ROAD,
          KELLEYSCHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, PIN - 600001

          BY ADVS.
          SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
          SRI.M.H.ASIF ALI
          SHRI.ARAVIND T RAMESH
          SHRI.ASHIK ALI M.H.
          SMT.ASWATHI K.C.

RESPONDENT/STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

     1    STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
          KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

     2    JIJO ANTONY.P,
          AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.ANTONY.V.D, POTTAKAL HOUSE,
          MANGALASSERY, KORATTY SOUTH, KIZHAKKUMMURI,
          KORATTI,THRISSUR, PIN - 680308

          BY ADV SHRI.ITTY PAULSON
          PP SRI MP PRASANTH


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   10.12.2025,   THE   COURT   ON       THE   SAME   DAY   PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                   2025:KER:95019
CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025         3


                          C.S.DIAS, J.
              ---------------------------------------
                CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025
      ------------------------------------------------------
     Dated this the 10th day of December, 2025

                            ORDER

The petitioners are the accused Nos 1 to 8 in

C.C.No.70/2021 on the file of the Special Court of the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur, for the

trial of cases under the Prize Chits and Money

Circulation Scheme (Banning), Act, 1978, (Trial

Court), which has arisen from Crime No.1436/2020

registered by the Town West Police Station, Thrissur,

alleging the commission of the offence punishable

under Section 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal

Code and Section 2(c) of the Prize Chits and Money

Circulation Schemes (Banning), Act, 1978.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the 2025:KER:95019 CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025 4

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash

all further proceedings in the above case. It is

asserted that the dispute that led to the registration

of the crime has been amicably settled between the

petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed

Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for

the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and

the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned counsel on either side submits

that, with the intervention of relatives and well-

wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes

amicably. The 2nd respondent has no subsisting

grievance and does not wish to pursue the

prosecution, and has no objection to the proceedings

being quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions,

submits that the Investigating Officer has not 2025:KER:95019 CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025 5

recorded the statement of the 2nd respondent.

However, the State has no objection to the Criminal

Miscellaneous case being allowed.

6. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of

this Court to quash criminal proceedings on the

ground of settlement between the parties have been

authoritatively laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court,

in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC

303], State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan

and Others [(2019) 5 SCC 688], Naushey Ali v.

State of U.P. [(2025) 4 SCC 78], and in a host of

judicial pronouncements. It is held that in cases

where the offences are not grave or heinous, and

where the parties have amicably settled the dispute,

to secure the ends of justice, the High Court may

invoke its inherent powers to quash the proceedings,

particularly if continuation of the prosecution would

serve no fruitful purpose.

                                                2025:KER:95019
CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025         6




7. On an overall consideration of the facts and

circumstances of the present case, and the materials

on record, I am satisfied that: the offences alleged

are not heinous or of a serious nature; no public

interest or element of societal concern is involved;

the chances of conviction are remote in view of the

settlement; and the continuation of the proceedings

would merely burden the judicial process without

advancing the cause of justice. Furthermore, the

settlement would promote harmony between the

parties and restore peace. Hence, this Court is

persuaded to hold that this is a fit case to exercise its

inherent jurisdiction.

In the result, the Crl. M.C. is allowed.

Accordingly, Annexure A1 Final Report in Crime

No.1436/2020 of the Town West Police Station, 2025:KER:95019 CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025 7

Thrissur, and all further proceedings in C.C. 70/2021

on the file of the Trial Court, as against the

petitioners, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE

SCB/10.12.25.

                                                 2025:KER:95019
CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025        8



APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 10846 OF 2025

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 1436/2020 OF THRISSUR TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR Annexure A2 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DT.08/10/2025

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter