Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarath Sasidharan vs State Of Kerala
2025 Latest Caselaw 11642 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11642 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2025

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sarath Sasidharan vs State Of Kerala on 1 December, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias
Bench: C.S.Dias
                                                     2025:KER:92676
CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

                                 1


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

 MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1947

                     CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

  CRIME NO.241/2021 OF Ranni Police Station, Pathanamthitta

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.808 OF 2022 OF

JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,RANNI

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4:

            SARATH SASIDHARAN
            AGED 33 YEARS
            S/O SASIDHARAN PILLAI, VECHUTHUNDIYIL
            HOUSE,CHETHAKKAL P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689677


            BY ADVS.
            SRI.MANSOOR.B.H.
            SMT.SAKEENA BEEGUM




RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
            KERALA, PIN - 682031

    2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            RANNI POLICE STATION. PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689533

    3       P.M THOMAS
            S/O MATHAI POOVELIL VEEDU,PODIPPARA,CHETHAKKAL P.O,
            CHETHAKKAL,PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689533
                                                 2025:KER:92676
CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

                               2


          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.A.MUHAMMED MUSTHAFA
          SHRI.S.PRAKASH



     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.12.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                            2025:KER:92676
CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

                                       3


                               ORDER

Dated this the 1st day of December, 2025

The petitioner is the 4th accused in

C.C.No.808/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial

First-Class Magistrate-I, Ranni (Trial Court), which

originates from Crime No.241/2021 registered by the

Ranni Police Station, Pathanamthitta, alleging the

commission of the offences punishable under Sections

143, 144, 147, 148, 447 and 427 r/w Section 149 of the

Indian Penal Code and Section 5 of the Kerala Prevention

of Damage to Private Property and Payment of

Compensation Act, 2019.

2. The crux of the prosecution allegation is that,

on 27.08.2020, at around 3.00 hours, the accused

persons, in prosecution of their common intention, had

formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and

demolished the gate and plantations of the de facto

complainant using an excavator and caused a loss of 2025:KER:92676 CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

Rs.2.5/- lakh. The said act was done in violation of the

injunction order passed by the Civil Court. Thus, the

accused have committed the above offences.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that, even if the allegations in Annexure A final report are

taken on their face value, the same will not constitute the

offences charged against the petitioner. There is no

material to substantiate the petitioner's involvement in

the crime. A reading of the first information report

would show that the petitioner was not even named as an

accused in the crime. Subsequently, the petitioner was

arraigned as an accused in the crime. Since there is no

corroborative material, the chances of conviction are

bleak. Therefore, all further proceedings in the above

crime may be quashed.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the 2025:KER:92676 CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

Crl.M.C. She submits that there are sufficient materials

to prove the petitioner's culpability in the crime. The

petitioner was identified on the date of incident itself. It

is on that basis that the final report has been filed. There

is a specific overt act attributed against the petitioner.

He along with other accused had trespassed into the

property of the 3rd respondent, demolished the boundary

and widened the public pathway by using an excavator.

The petitioner and the other accused persons had caused

a loss of Rs.2.5/- lakh to the 3 rd respondent. Hence, the

Crl.M.C. may be dismissed.

6. The petitioner's present attempt is to quash

Annexure A final report and all further proceedings in

C.C. No. 808/2022 of the Trial Court.

7. On a perusal of the materials on record, I find

that the petitioner had filed a writ petition to quash the

First Information Report and all further proceedings in

the crime. However, by Annexure D judgment, this Court 2025:KER:92676 CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

had dismissed the writ petition, and directed the

petitioner to surrender before the jurisdictional court, and

after the investigation was completed, to file a discharge

petition. This Court also directed the Trial Court to

consider the discharge petition without insisting for the

petitioner's presence. It seems that the petitioner has

not complied with the said directions, Instead he has filed

this Criminal Miscellaneous case to quash the final report.

8. In light of the directions in the above

judgment, I hold that the petitioner cannot re-agitate the

matter by filing a fresh Crl.M.C., seeking to quash

Annexure A final report, without first complying with the

directions in the judgment, that is to file a discharge

petition before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage.

Hence, I am of the definite view that it would be upto the

petitioner to first comply with the directions in Annexure

D judgment, and if the petitioner is aggrieved by any

order, he would be at liberty to work out his remedies in 2025:KER:92676 CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

accordance with law.

In the aforesaid circumstances, I dispose of the Crl.

M.C., by permitting the petitioner to workout his

remedies as directed in Annexure D judgment. If such

application is filed, the Trial Court is directed to consider

and dispose of the same, in accordance with law,

untrammelled by any observation made in this order.

Thereafter, if the petitioner is aggrieved by any order

passed by the Trial Court, he would be at liberty to

workout his remedies in accordance with law.

SD/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

rmm/1/12/2025 2025:KER:92676 CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 2363 OF 2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO:241/2021 OF RANNI POLICE STATION Annexure B TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 29/12/2021 BEARING NO:DB2-390/2020-21 ISSUED BY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, PATHANAMTHITTA Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE OFFER LETTER ISSUED BY THE PENTA CARE SERVICES LIMITED DATED 28/9/2023 Annexure D TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 1.11.2023 IN W.P.CRL.NO.1072/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter