Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Kerala vs Avaneendranath.P
2025 Latest Caselaw 5934 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5934 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2025

Kerala High Court

State Of Kerala vs Avaneendranath.P on 22 August, 2025

                                                 2025:KER:63294


W.A No.1768 of 2018​   ​       ​
                                      1

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI

                                      &

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M.

   FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1947

                           WA NO. 1768 OF 2018

             AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.11.2017 IN WP(C)

             NO.31458 OF 2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1, 2 AND 4 IN WPC:

      1      STATE OF KERALA​
             REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME AND
             VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.

      2      THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT​
             FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.

      3      THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E) INDIAN AUDIT AND
             ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, KERALA M.G.ROAD,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695039.


             BY SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER.

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS AND 3RD RESPONDENT IN WPC:

      1      AVANEENDRANATH.P​
                                                    2025:KER:63294


W.A No.1768 of 2018​   ​   ​
                                2

             (RETIRED JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I),
             THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PERUMBADA HOUSE,
             KODUVALLY, THALASSERY, PIN-670 101.

      2      BALAKRISHNAN PADINHARATH​
             (RETIRED JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAIGSTRATE,
             KUNNAMANGALAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT), VARADA, VIVEKANANDA
             NAGAR, R.D. NAGAR P.O., KASARAGOD, PIN-671124.

      3      THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA​
             ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682031, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR
             (SUBORDINATE JUDICIARY).


             BY ADV SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY

     THIS   WRIT  APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
04.06.2025, THE COURT ON 22.08.2025 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                          2025:KER:63294


W.A No.1768 of 2018​       ​     ​
                                       3


                                JUDGMENT

Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.

​ The present intra-court appeal assails the judgment dated

27.11.2017 passed in WP(C) No.31458 of 2017 whereby the learned

Single Judge has disposed the writ petition directing the appellants

herein to refix the pensionary benefits on the basis of the last pay

drawn by respondents 1 and 2 in the post of Judicial First Class

Magistrate and to grant all consequential benefits based on such

re-fixation within a period of three months.

2. The appellants herein were the respondents 1, 2 and 4 in the

writ petition whereas respondents 1 and 2 were the petitioners.

3. The respondents, being aggrieved by the non-grant of

pensionary benefits reckoning the last pay drawn as

Munsiff/Magistrate, had approached this Court praying for the

following reliefs:

2025:KER:63294

W.A No.1768 of 2018​ ​ ​

i.​ Call for the records leading to Exts.P12, P13 and P14 and quash them by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction. ii. ​ Declare that the petitioners are entitled to pension and other retirement benefits including medical reimbursement etc. based on the last рay drawn by them as Judicial Magistrates of the First Class. iii.​ Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to sanction and disburse pension and other retirement benefits including medical reimbursement etc. to the petitioners based on the last pay drawn by them as Judicial Magistrates of First Class with interest within a time limit to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court; and Iv.​ Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case including the costs of this Writ Petition (Civil).

4. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that in case of

temporary Munsiff/Magistrate, Rule 62 of KSR Part III, which was

amended as per G.O (P) No.95/2018/Fin dated 22.06.2018, provides

that pay drawn by an officer appointed as Temporary

Munsiff-Magistrate under Rule 9 of the Kerala Judicial Service Rules,

1991 shall not be treated as emoluments for pension and that in such 2025:KER:63294

W.A No.1768 of 2018​ ​ ​

cases the pensionary benefits shall be finalised on the basis of the pay

drawn by him in the post in his parent department. The

respondents 1 and 2 retired from service on 31.05.2016 well before

issuing the above Government Order. Learned Single Judge has

wrongly disposed the writ petition which ought to have been

dismissed on this ground alone.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2

submitted that the learned Single Judge was right in disposing the

writ petition inasmuch as the said Government Order was the subject

matter in identical writ petitions. This Court after considering the

case filed by Temporary Munsiff/Magistrate while they were on

deputation as in the case of respondents 1 and 2, had quashed the

Government Order to the extent it denies the benefits sought by the

respondents and directed sanction and disbursement of pension and

other retirement benefits. Learned Single Judge disposed the writ

petition based on identical judgments passed by this Court, Ext.P6 as

well as Ext.P9, by which the case of the respondents 1 and 2 is also 2025:KER:63294

W.A No.1768 of 2018​ ​ ​

governed. The said judgments have attained finality and the reliefs

have already been extended to the petitioners therein. In view of the

aforesaid, the writ appeal deserves to be dismissed.

6. Heard learned counsel on both sides. It is not in dispute that

the Government Order dated 22.06.2018 which came up for

consideration in other writ petitions has been set aside meaning

thereby there would be no applicability of the same in the case of

respondents 1 and 2. The issue raised in the writ petition already

stands answered in WP(C) No.21382 of 2009 and WP(C) No.36930 of

2016 as per judgments dated 11.03.2011 and 14.12.2016 respectively,

where similar issues have been dealt. Accordingly, we do not find any

error in the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge.

The writ appeal being bereft of merit and substance, is hereby

dismissed. However, the appellants are directed to refix and disburse

all the pensionary benefits to respondents 1 and 2 on the basis of

their last pay drawn as Munsiff/Magistrate, if not already 2025:KER:63294

W.A No.1768 of 2018​ ​ ​

implemented, within a period of three months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment.

       ​    ​      ​   ​     ​        ​   Sd/-

                         SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
​      ​    ​      ​   ​    ​    ​    JUDGE
      ​ ​   ​      ​   ​    ​    ​    Sd/-


                                      SYAM KUMAR V.M
                                          JUDGE

smp
                                                      2025:KER:63294


W.A No.1768 of 2018​    ​      ​






PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE I                  TRUE   COPY   OF    NOTIFICATION   IN     GO(P)
                            NO.95/18/FIN DATED 22.6.2018.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter