Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8325 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2025
2025:KER:33264
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. KRISHNA KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 9TH VAISAKHA, 1947
BAIL APPL. NO. 5838 OF 2025
CRIME NO.345/2025 OF CHERPU POLICE STATION, THRISSUR
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 11.04.2025 IN CMP NO.3037
OF 2025 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,THRISSUR
PETITIONER/SECOND ACCUSED:
BASIYO
AGED 28 YEARS
S/O NANDAN, ALACKAL HOUSE, KEEZHTHANI,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680125
BY ADVS.
T.H.ARAVIND
MANU SRINATH
RUKSANA SATHAR P.A.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
2 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CHERPU POLICE STATION,
THRISSUR., PIN - 695501
OTHER PRESENT:
G SUDHEER
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:33264
B.A NO. 5838 OF 2025 2
Dated this the 29th day of April, 2025
ORDER
This Bail Application is filed under Section
483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
(BNSS).
2. The petitioner is the second accused
in Crime No. 345/2025 of Cherpu Police Station,
Thrissur. The above case is registered against the
petitioner, alleging offences punishable under
Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2) and 110 r/w
Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case is that, on
06.04.2025, at about 08.45 p.m., the accused
persons, in furtherance of their common intention
and due to their enmity towards the defacto
complainant, attacked the defacto complainant,
kicked him and thereby caused grievous injury to the
defacto complainant. Accordingly, the accused have 2025:KER:33264
committed the above offences.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has
been falsely implicated in the present case. The
counsel further submitted that no materials are on
record to connect the petitioner with the alleged
crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. On the
other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted
that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the
intentional criminal acts of the petitioner, and he
is not entitled to bail at this stage.
6. The petitioner was arrested on
08.04.2025. The investigating agency had the
opportunity to take the petitioner in police
custody. From the submission of both sides, it
appears that the investigation of the case is now in
an advanced stage. The investigating agency did not
show any acceptable reasons for justifying further 2025:KER:33264
detention of the petitioner. The anxiety expressed
by the learned Public Prosecutor that the accused
would interfere with the process of investigation if
released on bail, can be addressed by imposing
suitable conditions. Having considered the entire
circumstances, including the stage of the
investigation and the tenure of judicial custody
undergone by the petitioner in the touchstone of the
well settled principles relating to bail, it is only
just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
7. In the result, the application is
allowed on the following conditions:
i. The petitioner shall be released on
bail on executing a bond for
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only)
with two solvent sureties for the like
sum each to the satisfaction of the
jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.
ii. The petitioner shall fully cooperate
with the investigation.
2025:KER:33264
iii. The petitioner shall appear before the
investigation officer between 10 a.m.
and 11 a.m. on every Saturday for a
period of three months or till filing
charge sheet, whichever is earlier. He
shall also appear before the
investigation officer as and when a
notice in writing is issued by the
investigating officer.
iv. The petitioner shall not commit
any offence of a like nature while on
bail.
v.The petitioner shall not interact with
the prosecution witnesses, directly or
through any other person, or in any
other way influence any witnesses or
other persons related to the
investigation and he shall not tamper
with the evidence.
2025:KER:33264
vi. The petitioner shall not leave Kerala
without the permission of the trial
court.
vii. The application, if any, for
deletion/modification of the bail
conditions or cancellation of bail on
the ground of violating the bail
conditions can be entertained by the
jurisdictional court, if it is found
necessary.
Sd/-
P. KRISHNA KUMAR JUDGE mtk/29.04.25 2025:KER:33264
APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 5838/2025
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. 345 OF 2025 REGISTERED AT CHERPU POLICE STATION.
Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.04.2025 PASSED BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT- 1, THRISSUR.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!