Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abdul Nouphal vs Mannarkkad Municipality
2025 Latest Caselaw 8310 Ker

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8310 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2025

Kerala High Court

Abdul Nouphal vs Mannarkkad Municipality on 25 April, 2025

WP(C)NOS.16917 & 11936 OF 2025                   2025:KER:33128
                                  1

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU

    FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 5TH VAISAKHA, 1947

                      WP(C) NO. 16917 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

          M.T. BALACHANDRAN
          AGED 62 YEARS
          S/O. M.T. NARAYANANKUTTY GUPTAN, MUSALIATH
          THAZHATHETHIL HOUSE, ARAKURRISI, MANNARKKAD,
          PALAKKAD, PIN - 678582


          BY ADV LIGEY ANTONY


RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATION HOUSE OFFICER
          MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION, MANNARKKAD,
          PALAKKAD, PIN - 678582

    2     ABDUL NOUPHAL
          S/O. MOHAMMED CHEERATHADAYAN HOUSE, MUNDAKAROD,
          MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678582

    3     MANNARKKAD MUNICIPALITY
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE,
          MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678582


          SMT RESMI THOMAS-GP; SRI P R VENKATESH-SC


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.04.2025, ALONG WITH WP(C).11936/2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)NOS.16917 & 11936 OF 2025                   2025:KER:33128
                                  2


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU

    FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 5TH VAISAKHA, 1947

                      WP(C) NO. 11936 OF 2025

PETITIONER:

          ABDUL NOUPHAL,
          AGED 49 YEARS
          S/O MOHAMMED CHEERATHADAYAN HOUSE, MUNDAKARAD ,
          MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678582


          BY ADV VINOD KUMAR.C


RESPONDENT:

          MANNARKKAD MUNICIPALITY,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE,
          MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678582

          BY ADV P.R.VENKATESH

          SMT NIMA JACOB-GP; SRI P R VENKATESH-SC


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.04.2025, ALONG WITH WP(C).16917/2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)NOS.16917 & 11936 OF 2025                  2025:KER:33128
                                 3

                          JUDGMENT

The petitioner in W.P(C)No.16917 of 2025 is a contractor

who has been entrusted with the interlocking work in the

Mundakkarad C.P.Sulaiman Faizi Front Road. Ext.P1 agreement

was executed by him with the Mannarkkad Municipality on

31.01.2025 and the time limit for completion of the work was

six months. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking

police protection to complete the work as per Ext.P1 agreement

without any obstruction from the 2 nd respondent who has filed

W.P(C)No.11936 of 2025 against the Municipality alleging that

the Municipality decided to lay tiles on the road only for 46

meters excluding 13 meters of road lying in front of the house of

petitioner in W.P(C)No.11936 of 2025 and his neighbours.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners in both

the case and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

Mannarkkad Municipality. The learned counsel for the petitioner

in W.P(C)No.11936 of 2025 takes notice for the 2 nd respondent in WP(C)NOS.16917 & 11936 OF 2025 2025:KER:33128

W.P(C)No.16917 of 2025. Hereafter the parties will be referred as

per array of parties in W.P(C)No.16917 of 2025

3. The dispute is with regard to the interlocking work

being restricted to some distance. The learned Standing Counsel

for the Municipality submitted that the work was awarded as per

Ext.P1 agreement produced along with W.P(C)No.16917 of 2025

and on account of financial constraints the work was restricted

to a portion of the road. The petitioner in W.P(C)No.16917 of

2025 seeks police protection to complete the work citing

obstruction caused by the 2nd respondent who is the petitioner in

the other writ petition.

4. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent submitted

that the 2nd respondent will not cause any obstruction, if the

work already completed, would be retained as such. This

submission is recorded.

5. The 2nd respondent shall not cause any obstruction to

the work and in case any obstruction is caused, the Station WP(C)NOS.16917 & 11936 OF 2025 2025:KER:33128

House Officer concerned shall afford sufficient police protection

to the petitioner to complete the work as per Ext.P1 agreement.

The Secretary of the Municipality is directed to consider

the representation of the 2nd respondent which is produced as

Ext.P1 in W.P(C)No.11936 of 2025 within two weeks.

These writ petitions are disposed of with the above

observations and directions.

Sd/-

S.MANU JUDGE MC WP(C)NOS.16917 & 11936 OF 2025 2025:KER:33128

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16917/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED WITH THE MUNICIPALITY ON 31.1.2025

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23.4.2025 SUBMITTED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 23.4.2025 ISSUED BY MANNARKKAD POLICE STATION WP(C)NOS.16917 & 11936 OF 2025 2025:KER:33128

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11936/2025

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 11.03.2025 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECRETARY MANNARKKAD MUNCIPALITY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter