Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajith E vs Union Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 28653 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28653 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Ajith E vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2024

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
         Thursday, the 26th day of September 2024 / 4th Aswina, 1946
                          WP(C) NO. 9360 OF 2020(T)
PETITIONERS:

  1. AJITH E, M/S. A AND D INDANE SERVICES, THUMBENI, SREEKANDAPURAM P
     O, KANNUR-670631.
  2. SRIKANTH K, PROPRIETOR, KADIRUR INDANE SERVICES, VETTUMMAL, KADIRUR,
     KANNUR-670642.
  3. KANNEEN K,PROPRIETOR, GEMINI GAS AND APPLIANCES, 13/6, RAILWAY
     STATION ROAD, THALASSERY, KANNUR-670104.
  4. JAYAKRISHNAN M , PROPRIETOR, HIGH STAR INDANE SERVICES, P O VARAM,
     KANNUR, KERALA-670594.
  5. SEELI P P ,PROPRIETOR, HAPPY INDANE SERVICES, DOOR NO. CP III/422A,
     KANHIRODE, KANNUR-670592.
  6. MUHAMMED NOUFAL C K, PROPRIETOR, VALLOLA INDANE, MP XII-571A,
     MAYYIL, KANNUR-670602.
  7. COL C J ANTONY (RETD) , PROPRIETOR, M/S. COLONEL'S INDANE SERVICES,
     DOOR NO.31/1, WARD NO.4, MATTANNUR, KANNUR-670702.
  8. K.K. DINESH , PROPRIETOR, SREE MUTHAPPAN GAS, VP XII/211C/211D,
     PATHRIYAD, KANNUR-670741.
  9. T.P. RAMACHANDRAN, PROPRIETOR, M/S. PADMALAYA INDANE SERVICES, CHALA
     P.O, THOTTADA, KANNUR-670007.
 10. SAJUNATH K.S, PROPRIETOR, M/S. KELAKAM INDANE, KP XII-380-381,
     KELAKAM, KANNUR-670674.
 11. SAAJAN ALINKEEL , PROPRIETOR, M/S. ALINKEEL GAS AGENCIES, MANGAD P
     O, KALLIASSERY, KANNUR-670562.
 12. SUJATHA V K , PROPRIETOR, M/S. MAHE GAS AGENCIES, VIA/142A, OPPOSITE
     GOVERNMENT L.P. SCHOOL, MAHE, PONDICHERRY-673311.

RESPONDENTS:

  1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM
     AND NATURAL GAS, SHASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110001
  2. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, MARKETING DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY
     CHIEF AREA MANAGER, INDANE AREA OFFICE, IIND FLOOR, P.M.K. TOWERS,
     WAYANAD ROAD, CIVIL STATION P O, KOZHIKODE-673020.
  3. THE CHIEF AREA MANAGER, INDANE AREA OFFICE, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION
     LTD, IIND FLOOR, P.M.K. TOWERS, WAYANAD ROAD, CIVIL STATION P O,
     KOZHIKODE-673020.

     Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to stay the effect and operation of Exhibit P2 to Exhibit P2(J)
and Exhibit P3 penalty communications/orders, pending disposal of the
above W.P.(C).
     This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the petition
and the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and this Court's orders dated
23.03.2020 & 08.9.2021 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S SHASHANK
 DEVAN & SRI.ADARSH KUMAR Advocates for the petitioners, DEPUTY SOLICITOR
GENERAL OF INDIA (in charge) FOR R1 (B/O), M/S SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR,
SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI, SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN, SRI.KURYAN THOMAS, SRI.PAULOSE C.
ABRAHAM & SRI.RAJA KANNAN, Advocates for R2 to R3 and of SRI.NANDAKUMAR,
Senior Counsel (By Order), the court passed the following:
                                HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.
                   ....................................................................
                     W.P.(C)Nos.9331 of 2020, 9360 of 2020,
                  9383 of 2020, 2552 of 2021, 8548 of 2021,
                 11912 of 2021, 12028 of 2021, 26790 of 2021,
                  2776 of 2022, 30986 of 2023, 22290 of 2024
                                       and 22392 of 2024
                      ..............................................................
                  Dated this the 26th day of September, 2024

                                           ORDER

It is pointed out by the learned Senior Counsel -

Sri.Nandakumar that the very same issue has been decided

in favour of the Petroleum Companies by a Division Bench of

the Delhi High Court. He further points out that this Court

had granted stay in these cases following the judgment of the

learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court, which has been

reversed by the Division Bench now. He further points out

that as against the judgment of the learned Division Bench,

the dealers have taken up the matter in appeal before the

Supreme Court and no stay is granted. In such

circumstances, he prays this Court to vacate the interim

orders granted in these cases.

The counsel for the petitioner seeks time.

Post on 07.10.2024.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE

rp

26-09-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter