Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishnu Pankajakshan vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 28511 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28511 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Vishnu Pankajakshan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                          2024:KER:71314


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                        PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

   WEDNESDAY, THE 25 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 3RD

                      ASWINA, 1946

                CRL.MC NO. 7287 OF 2024

 CRIME NO.235/2022 OF Vadakkancherry Police Station,

                        Palakkad

       AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.397 OF

2022 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,ALATHUR

PETITIONER/S:

   1      VISHNU PANKAJAKSHAN
          AGED 29 YEARS
          S/O. PANKAJAKSHAN KATTUNGAL HOUSE, ANTOPURAM,
          OKKAL P.O., CHELAMATTOM (PART), ERNAKULAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 683550

   2      SWARAJ P. S.
          AGED 29 YEARS
          S/O. SURENDRAN P. K., PAZHAYIDATH HOUSE,
          KIDANGOOR P.O., THURAVOOR, ERNAKULAM
          DISTRICT, PIN - 683572


          BY ADVS.
          JERRY PETER
          VIGNESH S.
          ARUN KUMAR K.P.
          NAYANA VARGHESE
          AHAMMAD SACHIN K.
 Crl.M.C.No.7287 of 2024




                                                           2024:KER:71314
                                  -2-




RESPONDENT/S:

     1       STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT
             OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

     2       ELDHO K. P.
             AGED 52 YEARS
             S/O. POULOSE K. I., KARIMBINKALAYIL HOUSE,
             KANTHALAM, KAIRADY P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
             PIN - 678510


             BY ADVS.
             NAMITHA GEORGE
             GANESH CHANDRAN S.



OTHER PRESENT:

             SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)


         THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   25.09.2024,    THE   COURT   ON    THE   SAME   DAY    PASSED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.7287 of 2024




                                                              2024:KER:71314
                                    -3-



                                 ORDER

Dated this the 25th day of September, 2024

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction

under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to quash all

proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused 1 and 2 in C.C.

No.397 of 2022 on the files of the Judicial

Magistrate of First Class, Alathur, arising out

of Crime No.235 of 2022 of Vadakkancherry Police

Station, Palakkad, registered for the offences

under Sections 341, 323 and 324 r/w Section 34 of

the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The 2nd respondent is

the de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused

had on 17.03.2022 assaulted the defacto

complainant after restraining him and thereby

2024:KER:71314

committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned counsel for the

respondents, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners

submitted that the matter has been settled and

hence the proceedings against the petitioners

ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that,

considering the nature of offences alleged, no

purpose would be served by continuing the

proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and

Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has

held that in appropriate cases, the High Court

can take note of the amicable resolution of

disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to

2024:KER:71314

put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view

was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v.

State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466]

and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of

Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A3 affidavit

filed by the 2nd respondent. The learned Public

Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification,

it is understood that the affidavit is genuine,

and the defacto complainant stands by the

contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter

has been settled and no public interest is

involved in this case. There is no impediment for

granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an

exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the

2024:KER:71314

petitioners in C.C. No.397 of 2022 on the files

of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Alathur are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE Scl/

2024:KER:71314

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO.235/2022 OF VADAKKENCHERRY POLICE STATION DATED 18.03.2022

Annexure A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 30.04.2022 IN C.C.NO.397/2022 ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, ALATHUR ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.235/2022 OF VADAKKANCHERY POLICE STATION

Annexure A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT DATED 23.08.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter