Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nabeesa vs Ashraf
2024 Latest Caselaw 28389 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28389 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Nabeesa vs Ashraf on 25 September, 2024

Criminal Appeal No.1166 of 2024
                                     1

                                                     2024:KER:71313
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA

  WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 3RD ASWINA, 1946

                           CRL.A NO. 1166 OF 2024

          AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.06.2023 IN ST NO.214 OF 2020

OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,THAMARASSERY.

             (CRIMINAL L.P.NO.116/2024 DATED 19/06/2024)

APPELLANT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

              NABEESA,
              AGED 50 YEARS,
              RESIDING AT KARIPPAL HOUSE, VADAKARA AMSAM DESAM,
              VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE,
              PIN - 673 101.


              BY ADVS.
              ARUNKUMAR P.
              ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL




RESPONDENT(S)/ACCUSED AND STATE:

      1       ASHRAF,
              RESIDING AT KANJHIRATHINKAL HOUSE,
              PARAPPANPOYIL POST, THAMARASSERY TALUK,
              KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN - 673 573.

      2       RAMLA,
              AGED 53 YEARS,
              RESIDING AT KANJHIRATHINKAL HOUSE,
              PARAPPANPOYIL POST, THAMARASSERY TALUK,
              KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KERALA STATE, PIN - 673 573.

      3       STATE OF KERALA,
              REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
              HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.
 Criminal Appeal No.1166 of 2024
                                      2

                                                               2024:KER:71313
              BY ADVS.
              JAYARAJ NAMBIAR K.K
              SIDHARTH J NAMBIAR(K/000347/2019)



       THIS   CRIMINAL     APPEAL   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR    ADMISSION   ON
25.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 Criminal Appeal No.1166 of 2024
                                         3

                                                                  2024:KER:71313



                                 C.S.SUDHA, J.
            --------------------------------------------------------------
                         Crl. Appeal No.1166 of 2024
           ---------------------------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 25th day of September 2024


                                  JUDGMENT

This is an appeal filed by the complainant in S.T.No.214/2020 on

the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I,

Thamarassery. The complaint was filed alleging commission of the

offence punishable under Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC

against the respondents herein who were arrayed as the accused in the

complaint. After complying with the necessary formalities, the trial of

the case started and on 02/04/2022, the complainant examined herself

as PW1. On the request of the learned counsel for the accused, the

cross examination of PW1 was adjourned. Thereafter, the case was

posted on several occasions. However, the complainant did not turn up

for cross examination and hence the trial court on 12/06/2023

acquitted the accused invoking Section 256(1) Cr.P.C. Aggrieved, the

complainant has come up in appeal.

Criminal Appeal No.1166 of 2024

2024:KER:71313

2. Advocates Jayaraj Nambiar and Sidharth J.

Nambiar, the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2/the accused

persons raise serious objections and draws my attention to the

impugned order which clearly refers to the number of opportunities

that had been granted to the complainant/appellant to present herself

before the Court for cross examination. It is also submitted that the

sole intention of the complainant/appellant is to harass the respondents

and not to prosecute the complaint.

3. Per contra, it was submitted by the learned counsel for

the complainant/appellant that she was unable to appear before the

Court due to personal reasons.

4. Heard both sides.

5. On going through the impugned order, I find that the

complainant/appellant had been granted more than sufficient

opportunity to present herself for cross examination. However, she

failed to turn up and therefore, the trial court cannot be faulted for

passing the impugned order. However, in the interest of justice and to

enable that the complainant/appellant to get an order on merits, the

impugned order is set aside on condition that the Criminal Appeal No.1166 of 2024

2024:KER:71313 complainant/appellant pays cost of ₹15,000/- to the respondents herein

within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this

order. If the aforesaid condition is complied with, the case shall stand

restored to file and the trial court shall take all steps to dispose of the

matter as expeditiously as possible. The cost shall be paid by the

complainant/appellant directly to the counsel appearing for the

respondents in the trial court.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/-

C.S.SUDHA JUDGE ak

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter