Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Midhun vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 27863 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27863 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Midhun vs State Of Kerala on 13 September, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                               2024:KER:70315
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 22ND BHADRA, 1946

                    CRL.MC NO. 7182 OF 2024

 CRIME NO.118/2018 OF KOLLENGODE POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD

        AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN SC NO.340 OF 2021

    OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - IV,

           PALAKKAD / III ADDITIONAL MACT, PALAKKAD

PETITIONER/ACCUSED 1 TO 3:

    1      MIDHUN
           AGED 26 YEARS
           NEDUVELIKULAM, PANAGATTIRA, ELEVANCHERRY PALAKAD,
           PIN - 678506

    2      MANISH
           AGED 31 YEARS
           NEDUVELIKULAM, PANAGATTIRA, PALAKKAD, PIN -
           678506

    3      BHARATAN
           AGED 35 YEARS
           VAKKANILAYAM, ELEVANCHERRY ,PALAKKAD, PIN -
           678506


           BY ADVS.
           ATHUL KRISHNA A.
           ARJUN C BHASKAR




RESPONDENTS/STATE/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1      STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
           KERALA, PIN - 682031
 Crl.M.C.No.7182 of 2024

                                               2024:KER:70315
                               2


     2      DEEPAK
            AGED 25 YEARS
            NAYAKKATHARA PANGATTIRA, KOLLENGODE ,PALAKKAD,
            PIN - 678506
            BY ADV.SARATH M.S - R2



OTHER PRESENT:

            SRI. C.N. PRABHAKARAN (PP)


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
13.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.7182 of 2024

                                                    2024:KER:70315
                                 3

                BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
          ......................................................
                 Crl.M.C.No. 7182 of 2024
            ...................................................
       Dated this the 13th day of September, 2024


                              ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under

Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha,

2023 to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 3 in S.C. No.

340/2021 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court - IV,

Palakkad, arising out of Crime No. 118/2018 of Kollengode

Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections

341, 323, 324, 326, and 308 read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code, 1860. Second respondent is the defacto

complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had

on 08.02.2018, restrained the defacto complainant and

assaulted him, inflicting grievous injuries and thereby

committed the offences alleged.

2024:KER:70315

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners

and the learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the

learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted

that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings

against the petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also

submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged,

no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and

Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that

in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the

amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the

wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This

view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v.

State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and

Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand

and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A4 affidavit filed by the

2nd respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted

that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is

2024:KER:70315

genuine, and the defacto complainant stands by the

contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been

settled and no public interest is involved in this case.There

is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in

futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the

petitioners in S.C. No. 340/2021 on the files of the

Additional Sessions Court -IV, Palakkad, are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Mms

2024:KER:70315

PETITIONERS ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF FIR IN THE ABOVE CRIME DATED 14/02/2018

ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE FINAL REPORT/CHARGE IN S.C. NO. 340/2021 ON THE FILES OF IV - ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE OF PALAKKAD DATED 25/01/2019

ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUECOPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF EVIDENCE / WITNESS LIST IN C.C.NO. 118/2018 ON THE FILES OF IV -

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE OF PALAKKAD DATED 25/01/2019

ANNEXURE A4 2ND RESPONDENT HAS SWORN TO AN AFFIDAVIT PROVING THE FACTUM OF SETTLEMENT IN THE MATTER AND THE SAID AFFIDAVIT DATED 28/07/2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter