Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanofar vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 27824 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27824 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Sanofar vs State Of Kerala on 13 September, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                2024:KER:70289
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 22ND BHADRA, 1946

                     CRL.MC NO. 7295 OF 2024

           CRIME NO.1982/2021 OF FORT POLICE STATION,

                       THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

         AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.472 OF 2022

OF       JUDICIAL    MAGISTRATE      OF     FIRST   CLASS      -

II,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

            SANOFAR
            AGED 40 YEARS
            S/O MAITHEEN KANNU, TC-39/1164, BISMI NAGAR,
            MANACADU WARD, MANACADU VILLAGE, FORT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695009


            BY ADV V.A.VINOD

RESPONDENTS/STATE/COMPLAINANT:

     1      STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
            KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

     2      STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            FORT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -
            695023

     3      JAMAL MUHAMMED SAINULABDEEN,
            AGED 58 YEARS
            S/O JAMAL MUHAMMED RESIDING AT TC 08/1502(1), SS
            VILLA, NEAR CITY PALACE HOTEL, THIRUMALA,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695006
 Crl.M.C.No.7295 of 2024


                                             2024:KER:70289
                               2


            BY ADV I.ARIF MUHAMMAD - R3


OTHER PRESENT:

            SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PP)


      THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
13.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.M.C.No.7295 of 2024


                                                     2024:KER:70289
                                     3

                BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
          ......................................................
                 Crl.M.C.No. 7295 of 2024
            ...................................................
       Dated this the 13th day of September, 2024


                                  ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section

528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023 to

quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioner is the accused in C.C. No. 472/2022 on

the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II,

Thiruvananthapuram, arising out of Crime No.1982/2021 of

Fort Police Station, registered for the offences under

Sections 188, 447, 427 and 268 read with Section 34 of the

Indian Penal Code, 1860. Third respondent is the defacto

complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had

on 25.10.2021 and 31.10.2021, trespassed into the

property of the defacto complainant and caused damages

to his windows to the tune of Rs.10,000/- and dumped fruit

waste into the property and thereby committed the

2024:KER:70289

offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the

learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings

against the petitioner ought to be quashed. It was also

submitted that, considering the nature of offence alleged,

no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and

Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that

in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the

amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the

wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This

view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v.

State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and

Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand

and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A4 affidavit filed by the

3rd respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted

2024:KER:70289

that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is

genuine, and the defacto complainant stands by the

contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been

settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There

is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in

futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the

petitioners in C.C. No.472/2022 on the files of the Judicial

First Class Magistrate Court-II, Thiruvananthapuram, are

quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Mms

2024:KER:70289

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 1982/2021 OF FORT POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 02.11.2021

ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C NO 472/2022 PENDING ON THE FILES OF HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 15.05.2022

ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL MC NO 4550/202 DATED 12.08.2022

ANNEXURE A4 THE ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 22.08.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter