Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jahfar N vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 27784 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27784 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Jahfar N vs State Of Kerala on 13 September, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                                    2024:KER:70144
CRL.MC NO. 7710 OF 2024

                                           1


                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                        PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

       FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 22ND BHADRA, 1946

                                CRL.MC NO. 7710 OF 2024

       CRIME NO.260/1999 OF NILAMBUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM

             AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.944 OF 2017 OF

                JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, NILAMBUR

                      ............................................

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.3 (ORIGINAL ACCUSED NO.36) :
           JAHFAR N, AGED 49 YEARS
           S/O.MUHAMMED, NADUTHODIKA HOUSE,
           POOKKOTTUMPADAM, NILAMBUR,
           MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679 332.

               BY ADV BABU S. NAIR

RESPONDENT/STATE & COMPLAINANT :
     1     STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
           ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682 031.

       2       THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
               NILAMBUR POLICE STATION,
               MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679 329



               SMT. SREEJA V (PP)


THIS       CRIMINAL     MISC.    CASE   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
13.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                                     2024:KER:70144
CRL.MC NO. 7710 OF 2024

                                                   2



                               BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                          ......................................................
                                   Crl.M.C.No.7710 of 2024
                           ...................................................
                    Dated this the 13th day of September, 2024


                                               ORDER

Petitioner was the 36th accused in C.C.No.402/2002 on the files of the

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nilambur; which arose out of Crime

No.260/1999 of Nilambur Police Station, Malappuram. Since many of the

accused, including the petitioner had absconded, the case against them

was split up, and the trial continued against the remaining accused.

2. By judgment dated 13.03.2006, those accused, who faced trial were

acquitted; while case against the petitioner and the remaining accused

was split up and renumbered as C.C.No.105/2006 before the same court.

In the said proceedings also, petitioner absconded and the case

proceeded against the remaining accused. Those accused who faced trial

were also acquitted by judgment dated 31.10.2011. Thereafter, the case

against the petitioner herein was re-numbered as C.C.No.944/2017, in

which petitioner was arrayed as the 3 rd accused. Petitioner seeks the

benefit of acquittal of the co-accused.

2024:KER:70144 CRL.MC NO. 7710 OF 2024

3. Prosecution alleges that on 28.06.1999, the accused persons formed

themselves into an unlawful assembly and committed rioting, armed with

deadly weapons and also destroyed a camera, causing a loss of

Rs.1,500/- thereby committing the offences punishable under Sections

143, 147, 148, 332, 324, 326, 427, 188 r/w Section 149 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860 apart from Section 3(i) of the Prevention of Damage to

Public Property Act, 1984.

4. I have heard Sri.Babu S. Nair, the learned counsel for the petitioner as

well as Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. On a reading of the judgment of acquittal of the co-accused in

C.C.No.402/2002 and C.C.No.105/2006, I am satisfied that the

substratum of the prosecution case has been destroyed. The trial court

has, in those two cases, observed that the identity of the accused

persons were not properly proved since more than 300 persons had

assembled in front of the police station and picking out 37 persons out

of that mob is not credible, especially in the absence of any test

identification parade. The findings in the aforesaid two judgments, go to

the root of the prosecution case and the benefit of doubt given to other

accused ought to be extended to the petitioner as well.

2024:KER:70144 CRL.MC NO. 7710 OF 2024

6. Accordingly, the proceeding against the petitioner in C.C.No.944/2017 on

the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nilambur, arising

out of Crime No.260/1999 of Nilambur Police Station, is an abuse of the

process of the court and is hereby quashed.

Crl.M.C. is allowed.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/13/09/2024 2024:KER:70144 CRL.MC NO. 7710 OF 2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF EVIDENCE ALONG WITH CHARGE AND STATEMENT OF THE WITNESSES IN CRIME NO.160/1999 OF THE NILAMBUR POLICE STATION

ANNEXURE B CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE J.F.C.M., NILAMBUR IN C.C.NO.402/2002 DATED 13-3-2006

ANNEXURE C CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN C.C.NO.105/2006 OF THE J.F.C.M., NILAMBUR DATED 31-10-2011

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter