Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27381 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024
2024:KER:69370
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 20TH BHADRA, 1946
CRL.MC NO. 7629 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.384 OF 2024
OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,PAYYANNUR
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
AGNUS CRASTA,
AGED 70 YEARS
W/O MARSAL D SOUZA, GOSADA HOUSE, MOVVAR.P.O,
BADIYADUKKA (VIA), KSASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN -
671543
BY ADV V.T.MADHAVANUNNI
RESPONDENTS/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, PIN - 682031
2 SIBILA DAS.P.P.
AGED 34 YEARS
D/O MICHAELDAS, PARAMBIL PARAYIL HOUSE, ST.
MARRIES NAGAR, PARIYARAM.P.O, PARIYARAM AMSOM,
TALIPARAMBA TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670502
OTHER PRESENT:
PP M P PRASANTH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 11.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC NO. 7629 OF 2024 2
2024:KER:69370
ORDER
Dated this the 11th day of September, 2024
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under
Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to
quash all further proceedings in C.C.No.384/2024 on the files of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Payyannur. The petitioner herein
is the sole accused in the above crime.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the
learned counsel appearing for the de facto complainant and the
learned Public Prosecutor.
3. In this matter, offences punishable under Sections
498(A), 406 r/w 34 of IPC are alleged to have been committed by the
accused.
4. It is submitted that the matter has been amicably
settled and the de facto complainant filed affidavit in this regard in a
case involving matrimonial dispute, arising out of a private complaint
lodged by the de facto complainant.
2024:KER:69370
5. Since this matter has been settled between parties,
arising out of a private complaint and the de facto complainant filed an
affidavit in support of settlement and the counsel appearing for both
sides conceded the settlement, there is no reason to disallow the
prayer for quashment, so as to facilitate peaceful living of the parties
hereinafter. Therefore, in the interest of justice, I am inclined to allow
this petition.
In the result, this petition stands allowed and all further
proceedings in C.C.No.384/2024 on the files of the Judicial First Class
Magistrate Court, Payyannur, as against the petitioner/ accused stand
quashed.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE
vnk/-
2024:KER:69370
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT AS C.C.NO.223/2020 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JFCM COURT, PAYYANNUR, DATED 13.12.2019
Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DOCKET ORDER IN C.M.P. NO. 9960/2019 IN C.C. NO. 223/220 DATED 6-2-2020 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PAYYANNUR
Annexure A3 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN C.C. NO. 223/2020 DATED 12-4-2024 JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PAYYANNUR
Annexure A4 AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 31.8.2024
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!