Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27329 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2024
2024:KER:69462
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHNSON JOHN
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 20TH BHADRA, 1946
RFA NO. 374 OF 2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.02.2013 IN OS NO.247 OF 2008 OF
SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA
-----
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2 & 3:
1 S.SAJITHA
AGED 36 YEARS
D/O.LATE RAMAN SADASIVAN,PLAKUTHARA
VADAKKATHIL(EASWARAN KUTTIYIL),CHERAVALLY
MURI,KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE,RESIDING AT ELAMPIDATH
THEKKATHIL,PERINGALAMURI,KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE.
2 AJITHA
AGED 34 YEARS
D/O.LATE RAMAN SADASIVAN,PLAKUTHARA
VADAKKATHIL(EASWARAN KUTTIYIL),CHERAVALLY MURI,
KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE,PRESENTLY WORKING AT KAIMOTIVILA
COLONIYIL,WEST FORT,MAVELIKKARA.
BY ADV PRAVEEN THOMAS ABRAHAM
RESPONDENTS/ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS 2 TO 4/1ST DEFENDANT:
1 EASWARI, (DIED; L.R.s recorded)
AGED 62 YEARS,
D/O.DEVAKI,VINESH BHAVANAM,PERINGALA MURI,
KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE-691006.
2024:KER:69462
RFA NO.374 OF 2013 -2-
*[IT IS RECORDED THAT, THE FIRST RESPONDENT IS NO MORE AND SECOND
AND THIRD RESPONDENTS ARE THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
DECEASED FIRST RESPONDENT, VIDE ORDER DATED 05/09/2024 IN MEMO
DATED 16/08/2024 IN RFA 374/2013]
2 VINEESH KUMAR,
AGED 36 YEARS,
S/O.DEVAKI,VINESH BHAVANAM,PERINGALA MURI,KAYAMKULAM
VILLAGE-691006.
3 VINEETHA VASU,
AGED 22 YEARS,
D/O DEVAKI,VINESH BHAVANAM,PERINGALA MURI,KAYAMKULAM
VILLAGE-691006.
4 G.SANTHA,
AGED 59 YEARS,
W/O LATE RAMAN SADASIVAN,PLAKUTHARA VADAKKATHIL
(EASWARAN KUTTIYIL),CHERAVALLY MURI,KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE-
691006.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.R.DILEEP
SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL
SRI.MANU SEBASTIAN
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON
11.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:69462
SATHISH NINAN &
JOHNSON JOHN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
R.F.A. No.374 of 2013
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 11th day of September, 2024
J U D G M E N T
Sathish Ninan, J.
The appeal was listed on 16.08.2024, and on that date,
it was reported that the first respondent is no more. The
matter was adjourned to 03.09.2024 for steps.
2. On 03.09.2024, there was no representation for the
appellant and the case was adjourned to 04.09.2024. Since
there was no representation for the appellant on that day,
the case was adjourned to 05.09.2024. On the said date also
there was no representation for the appellant and the appeal
was re-posted to 06.09.2024. Even on that date there was no
representation for the appellant and the appeal was again
adjourned to this date. Even today there is no
representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent.
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE Sd/-
JOHNSON JOHN JUDGE kns/-
//True Copy// P.S. To Judge
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!