Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27084 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024
2024:KER:67767
RP NO. 797 OF 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 15TH BHADRA, 1946
RP NO. 797 OF 2024
ARISING FROM THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.03.2024 IN WP(C)
NO.12884 OF 2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
THAYAT SUHARA
AGED 60 YEARS
W/O N.M HAMZA, RAAZI MANZIL HOUSE,
MADAPALLY COLLEGE P.O, VADAKARA,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-PIN, PIN - 673102
BY ADV M.MUHAMMED SHAFI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE SECRETARY
CHORODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, CHORODE,
MUTTUNGAL P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT
PIN - 673106
3 THE CHORODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, CHORODE, MUTTUNGAL P.O,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673106
2024:KER:67767
RP NO. 797 OF 2024
2
4 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
PWD, NATIONAL HIGH WAY SECTION, VADAKARA,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673101
5 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD, NH DIVISION, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673101
6 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KOZHIKODE DT.,
PIN - 676515
7 THE URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETY LTD, MADAPALLY COLLEGE P.O,
KOZHIKODE DT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
PIN - 673102
8 SMT. K.K. THULASI
MEMBER, CHORODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
THIRUVATHU MEETHAL HOUSE, CHORODE EAST P.O,
VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673106
9 THE THAHSILDAR
TALUK OFFICE, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE DT.,
PIN - 673101
10 THE TALUK SURVEYOR
MINI CIVIL STATION, VADAKARA,
KOZHIKODE DT., PIN - 673101
BY ADV
SMT. DEEPA NARAYANAN,
SR. GP. SRI. SUJAI SATHYAN SC FOR PANCHAYATH
SRI. T. SETHU MADHAVAN SC FOR PANCHAYATH
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 06.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:67767
RP NO. 797 OF 2024
3
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the review petitioner contended
that the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in
Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
having come into force, the first 4 directions in the impugned
judgment may be substituted with directions enabling the
petitioner to seek remedies under the Act of 2013.
2. As the directions in the judgment were issued
taking into account the special circumstances involved and the
decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in Kalyani (Dead)
through L.Rs and Ors. v. The Sulthan Bathery Municipality
and Others [2022 SCC Online SC 516], there is no error as far as
the directions are concerned. Hence, the prayer for substituting
those directions with those under the 2013 Act cannot be
countenanced. The review petition is therefore dismissed.
2024:KER:67767 RP NO. 797 OF 2024
The petitioner is granted a month's time from today for
submitting the application as directed in the judgment.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE scs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!