Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhaneeshkumar vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 26974 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26974 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Dhaneeshkumar vs State Of Kerala on 6 September, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

CRL.MC NO. 6538 OF 2024

                               1

                                                2024:KER:68104
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

  FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 15TH BHADRA, 1946

                   CRL.MC NO. 6538 OF 2024

   CRIME NO.1239/2016 OF Anthikad Police Station, Thrissur

          LPR NO.17 OF 2024 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/I

                ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR

PETITIONER/ ACCUSED :

          DHANEESHKUMAR
          AGED 37 YEARS
          CHANASSERY HOUSE, KOOLIMUTTAM VILLAGE,
          POKLAYI DESOM, THRISSUR DIST,
          PIN - 680 691

          BY ADVS.
          V.T.RAGHUNATH
          C.V.RAJALAKSHMI



RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT :

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
          HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031

    2     AKHILESH
          KUNJANDIVEETTIL, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,
          THRISSUR DIST, PIN - 680567

          BY ADV Adv. Devika Mohan

          BY SMT. SREEJA V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 6538 OF 2024

                                     2

                                                          2024:KER:68104
                      BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                        Crl.M.C.No.6538 of 2024
                      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
               Dated this the 6th day of September, 2024

                                  ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to quash all proceedings

against him.

2. Petitioner is the accused in L.P.R.No.17 of 2024 on the files of

the Assistant Sessions Court, Thrissur, arising out of Crime No.1239 of

2016 of Anthikad Police Station, Thrissur, registered for the offences

under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 308 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860. 2nd respondent is the defacto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 30.06.2016

restrained the defacto complainant and assaulted him and thereby

committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioner

ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature

of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the

proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 CRL.MC NO. 6538 OF 2024

2024:KER:68104 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High

Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the

victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This

view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab

and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v.

State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-6 affidavit filed by the 2 nd

respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon

verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto

complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the

matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case.

There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The

continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in

L.P.R.No.17 of 2024 on the files of the Assistant Sessions Court, Thrissur

are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM CRL.MC NO. 6538 OF 2024

2024:KER:68104

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT INCLUSIVE OF MEMO OF EVIDENCE DATED 31.08.2016 FILED BEFORE THE JFCM II THRISSUR

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF PW1 IN SC 68 OF 2017 DT. 17.06.23

Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF PW2 (CW2) IN SC 68 OF 2017 DTD. 12.07.23

Annexure 4 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF PW3 IN SC 68 OF 2017 DTD. 25.07.23

Annexure 5 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN SC 68 OF 2017 DATED 31.07.2023 OF THE IST ADDL ASST SESSIONS COURT THRISSUR

Annexure 6 AFFIDAVIT SWORN TO BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AKHILESH DATED 26.07.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter