Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26934 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024
2024:KER:67831
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 15TH BHADRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 31621 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
KUNJUMON
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O MATHEW VARGHESE, KUNNUVILA THEKKATHIL,
THRIPPILAZHIKAM P.O., KAREEPRA VILLAGE,
KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691509
BY ADVS.
K.V.ANIL KUMAR
RADHIKA S.ANIL
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT TELECOM COMMITTEE, KOLLAM
CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN/
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PIN - 691013
2 TAHSILDAR
TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 691506
3 VILLAGE OFFICER
KAREEPRA, KOLLAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 691509
4 KAREEPRA GRAMAPANCHAYATH
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KAREEPRA P.O.,
KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691509
5 TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA (TRAI)
GROUND FLOOR, TELEPHONE HOUSE, NO.1,
RAJ BHAVAN ROAD,
BEHIND GENERAL POST OFFICE (GPO),
BENGALURU, KARNATAKA STATE, PIN - 560001
W.P.(C)No.31621 of 2024
2024:KER:67831
2
6 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED
8TH FLOOR, VANKARATH TOWER, PALARIVATTOM, (REPRESENTED BY
ITS MANAGER- LEGAL, V.G SANKARAN, 52 YEARS, S/O M.
VENUGOPALAN, TOWER-I, FLAT NO. 203, NATIONAL EXPRESS
GARDEN, VENNALA, KOCHI, PIN - 682024
7 BABY GEORGE (KOCHUMON)
KRIS BHAVAN, THRIPPILAZHIKAM P.O., KAREEPRA VILLAGE,
KOTTARAKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691509
BY ADVS.
T.C. KRISHNA, DSGI IN CHARGE
DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.31621 of 2024
2024:KER:67831
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 06th day of September, 2024
The petitioner, a resident of Kareepra village in
Kollam District, is aggrieved by the installation of a
telecommunication tower in his locality, and in close
proximity to some of the residences. The petitioner
apprehends that transmission of radioactive waves
from the tower will adversely affect the health of
the residents. Voicing this apprehension, petitioner
had preferred Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner
submitted that, for the time being, the petitioner
will be satisfied with a direction to the 1 st
respondent to consider Ext.P3 expeditiously.
3. I heard the learned Government Pleader
also.
2024:KER:67831
Considering the limited relief sought, the writ
petition is disposed of, directing the 1 st respondent
to take a decision on Ext.P3 expeditiously and at
any rate, within one month, after affording an
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN
JUDGE NB/6-9
2024:KER:67831
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31621/2024
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 09.08.2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT-P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE MASS COMPLAINT DATED 24.06.2024 BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT-P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.08.2024 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!