Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vidya Jyothi Central School vs Oachira Grama Panchayat
2024 Latest Caselaw 26827 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26827 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Vidya Jyothi Central School vs Oachira Grama Panchayat on 6 September, 2024

                                                     "CR"




                                          2024:KER:68092

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                        PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON

 FRIDAY, THE 6 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 15TH BHADRA,

                         1946

                WP(C) NO. 20230 OF 2019

PETITIONER/S:

        VIDYA JYOTHI CENTRAL SCHOOL
        PAYIKUZHY, OACHIRA P.O, KOLLAM-690 526,
        REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SOMAN PILLAI,
        AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. GOVINDA PILLAI, RESIDING
        AT THEKKE VENGALIL, VAVVAKKAVU P.O,
        KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM-690 528


        BY ADVS.
        P.B.SAHASRANAMAN
        SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR




RESPONDENT/S:

        OACHIRA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
        OACHIRA P.O, KOLLAM -690 526, REPRESENTED BY
        ITS SECRETARY.


        BY ADVS.
        K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
        P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM)
        K.SUDHINKUMAR
        S.K.ADHITHYAN
 W.P.(C) No.20230 of 2019




                                                          2024:KER:68092
                                  -2-


             SABU PULLAN
             GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN



      THIS    WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)        HAVING    BEEN   FINALLY
HEARD   ON     06.09.2024,      THE     COURT     ON     THE   SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.20230 of 2019




                                                      2024:KER:68092
                                    -3-


                                                                "CR"


                               JUDGMENT

Dated this the 06th day of September, 2024

The petitioner, a CBSE affiliated School, pursuant to

Ext.P1 NOC and Ext.P2 certificate of affiliation, has filed the

captioned writ petition challenging the demand of property tax

under the provisions of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act ('the Act'

for short) against it.

2. The short facts that arise for consideration in the

writ petition are as follows;

The petitioner is having three buildings, in which the

School is run by Sree Narayana National Education Mission.

The fact that the petitioner is having the affiliation from the

CBSE under the Union Ministry of Human Resources

Development, Government of India, is clear from Ext.P2

certificate. By Exts.P3 to P5, property taxes with respect to

2024:KER:68092

2016-17 and 2017-18 were sought to be realised from the

petitioner. The petitioner submitted Ext.P6 objection with

specific reference to the exemption available under Section

207(1) (ba) of the Act. However, the said claim stood rejected

by Ext.P7, issued by the respondent herein, taking the stand

that it is only against the educational institutions having

recognition from the Government, the exemption is applicable.

When subsequent notices for later periods were issued

demanding tax, Ext.P9 objection is filed by the petitioner

before the respondent. By Ext.P10, the respondent directed

the petitioner to produce the CBSE affiliation details within

three days. The petitioner provided the details called for by

Ext.P11 dated 08.04.2019. However, in spite of the above, the

Panchayat has taken proceedings under the Cr.P.C on account

of which, the petitioner has filed the captioned writ petition

seeking for a declaration as regards its entitlement for the

benefits of exemption from tax to the properties.

2024:KER:68092

2. I have heard Sri.T.S.Harikumar, learned Counsel for

the petitioner and Sri.K. Sudhin Kumar, learned Counsel for the

respondent Panchayat.

3. Sri.Harikumar, relying on the judgment of this Court

in W.P.(C) No.22014 of 2023, submits that the provision under

Section 207(1)(ba) stood omitted only from 01.04.2023 and

till that date, the petitioner was entitled for the benefit under

the statute.

4. Sri.Sudhin Kumar, on the other hand, relies on the

judgment of this Court in Manager, Vimal Jyothi

Engineering College and Others v. State of Kerala and

Others [2019 (5) KHC 641] to contend that unless and

until, the educational institution is one aided/funded by the

Government, the benefits under the statute cannot be

extended.

5. I have considered the rival submissions as well as

the connected records.

2024:KER:68092

6. The provisions under Section 207(1)(b) and (ba)

read as under;

"207. Exemption from Tax, Cess, etc. - (1) The following buildings and lands shall be exempted from property tax as may be levied under S.203 and service cess as may be levied under sub-section (2) of Section 200, namely:-

(a) xxx

(b) building exclusively used for educational purposes or allied purposes under the ownership of educational institutions owned by the Government, aided or functioning with the financial assistance of the Government and the hostel buildings wherein the students of the said institutions reside;

(ba) building exclusively used for educational purposes under the ownership of educational institutions having the recognition of the Government and upto the level of Higher Secondary and hostel buildings in which the students of such institutions reside."

A reading of the above provisions would show that under

Section 207, the benefit of exemption was extended under two

2024:KER:68092

heads. The first exemption was under 207(1)(b), wherein the

benefit was provided only as against buildings exclusively used

for educational purposes under the 'ownership of institutions

owned by the Government, aided or functioning with the

financial assistance of the Government'. It is with reference to

the above provisions, that the judgment of this Court in

Manager, Vimal Jyothi Engineering College (supra) is

rendered.

7. However, in the case at hand, the petitioner is

claiming the benefits under Section 207 (1)(ba). Under the

above Clause, buildings exclusively used for educational

purposes 'under the ownership of educational institutions

having the recognition of the Government and up to the level

of Higher Secondary' are eligible for the benefits. The

petitioner, as noticed earlier, is running an educational

institution, having recognition from the Union of India as

evidenced by Ext.P2. Therefore, at the first blush, it may

2024:KER:68092

appear that the petitioner is recognised by the Government.

8. However, a reference to the provisions under

Section 2(xviii) of the Act makes it clear that the term

'Government' only includes the 'Government of Kerala'. The

petitioner has no case that it is having a recognition from the

Government of Kerala. Hence, the petitioner would not be

entitled for the benefits under Section 207(1)(ba). Therefore, I

find no reason to entertain the claim of the petitioner.

In the result, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

HARISANKAR V. MENON JUDGE Scl/

2024:KER:68092

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20230/2019

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P13 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING NO. OP II/ 1184 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 13-01-2021

Exhibit P 14 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 13-01-2021 WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING NO.OP II/1185 DATED 13-01-2021

Exhibit P 15 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 13-01-2021

Exhibit P 16 THE TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 10- 03-2021 WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING NO.OP II/1184, 1185 AND 1186 FOR THE YEAR 2019-20 TO 2020-21

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING NO. OP II/1186.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL, DATED 31.03.2018.

2024:KER:68092

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE OF THE RESPONDENT, DATED 30.04.2018.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT, DATED 01.03.2019.

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOC ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER SCHOOL BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, DATED 30.06.2005.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT, DATED 18.03.2019.

EXHIBIT P11 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER, DATED 08.04.2019.

EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMONS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER IN S.T. NO. 847 OF 2019 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY ALONG WITH THE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL, DATED 14.03.2019.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AFFILIATION, DATED 11.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION TO THE PETITIONERS' SCHOOL.

2024:KER:68092

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING NO. OP II/1184.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE WITH RESPECT TO THE BUILDING NO. OP II/1185.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter