Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26634 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024
2024:KER:67438
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 14TH BHADRA, 1946
CRL.A NO. 1177 OF 2024
CRIME NO.97 OF 2021 OF KADAKKAVOOR POLICE STATION ,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2023 IN MC NO.72 OF 2024
OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT (ATROCITIES &
SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN & CHILDREN),THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT(S)/COUNTER PETIONER/SURETIES:
1 AJITHA
AGED 28 YEARS
D/O ASHOKAN, KOTTUVILA HOUSE, KODITHOOKKAKUNNU,
KAVALAYOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695144
2 SUJATHA A
AGED 51 YEARS
W/O ASHOKAN, KOTTUVILA HOUSE, KODITHOOKKAKUNNU,
KAVALAYOOR P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695144
BY ADVS.
V.A.VINOD
SUHAIL M.
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.09.2024, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2024:KER:67438
2
Crl.A.No.1177/2024
C.S.SUDHA, J.
-------------------------------------------------------
Crl.A.No.1177/2024
--------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 5th day of September 2024
JUDGMENT
This is an appeal under Section 495 BNSS filed by the
counter petitioners in M.C.No.72/2023 in S.C.No.216/2023 on
the file of the Court for Trial of cases relating to atrocities and
sexual violence against women and children, Thiruvananthapurm.
The counter petitioners were sureties of the accused in the
aforesaid case. The accused absconded during the course of trial
and hence notice was issued to the counter petitioners who
remain absent in spite of service of notice. The accused also
absconded and went to gulf. As it was found that he had violated
the bail conditions M.C was registered by the trial court. The
counter petitioners also failed to produce the accused and no
sufficient reasons also shown for the same. Therefore the trial 2024:KER:67438
court issued notice to the counter petitioners pursuant to which
also they failed to show cause why the bond amount should not
be forfeited. However, the trial court proceeded to pass the
impugned order by which the counter petitioners have been
directed to pay penalty of ₹50,000/- each under Section 446
Cr.P.C.
2. The learned counsel for the counter petitioners/
appellants submit that after the bond was forfeited, the accused
appeared before the trial court and is now facing trial. He also
submitted that in a connected case also, bail bond has been
cancelled and the sureties have been directed to pay the bond
amount of ₹50,000/- each and therefore maximum leniency may
be shown and the penalty amount reduced.
3. The submissions are not seriously objected to by the
learned Public Prosecutor.
4. Heard both sides.
2024:KER:67438
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the
impugned order is modified. The counter petitioners are directed
to pay penalty of ₹20,000/- each, which shall be paid within a
period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. To the said extent the impugned order stands modified.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
C.S.SUDHA JUDGE Raj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!