Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vijayaraj.R vs South Indian Bank
2024 Latest Caselaw 26605 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26605 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Vijayaraj.R vs South Indian Bank on 5 September, 2024

Author: C.S.Dias

Bench: C.S.Dias

                                                             2024:KER:67534



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

   THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 14TH BHADRA, 1946

                           RP NO. 147 OF 2024

        AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.8402 OF 2023 OF HIGH

COURT OF KERALA


REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:

            VIJAYARAJ.R
            AGED 49 YEARS
            S/O.RAMANEZHUTHACHAN, KADAMOMKOTTIL HOUSE,
            PROPRIETOR, M/S.RAMACHANDRA HANDLOOMS,
            KAYARAMPARA, KUTHAMPULLY, THRISSUR, PIN - 680594


            BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)


RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

    1       SOUTH INDIAN BANK
            REGIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKAD,
            DOOR NO.733/2, FIRST FLOOR, D&D ARCADE BUILDING,
            CHITTUR ROAD, MANAPPULLIKAVU,
            KUNNATHURMEDU.P.O, PALAKKAD.
            REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER, PIN -
            678013

    2       THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK
            THIRUVILWAMALA BRANCH, THIRIWILWAMALA P.O,
            THRISSUR. REP.BY ITS MANAGER, PIN - 680588

            BY ADVS.
            K.MADHUSOODANAN
            MATHEW JACOB (KUNNATHU)(K/398/2013)
            SYRIAC JOSEPH(K/304/1980)
            SRI. SUNIL SANKAR. P



     THIS    REVIEW   PETITION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR    ADMISSION   ON
05.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                        2024:KER:67534
R.P No.147 of 2024               2


                           C.S.DIAS,J.
         ====================
              R.P No.147 of 2024
                                in
                     W.P(C). No.8402 of 2023
       ------------------------------------ --
         Dated this the 5th day of September, 2024

                             ORDER

The review petition is filed to review the

judgment dated 24.08.2023 passed in the writ petition.

2. The review petitioner has stated that, by the

afore-stated judgment, this Court had disposed of the

writ petition, by directing the petitioner to pay the

outstanding amount with future interest and cost to the

second respondent bank in twelve equated monthly

instalments commencing from 24.09.2023. Due to

circumstances beyond the petitioner's control, he could

not pay the amount within time as his business suffered a

setback. In the meantime, the respondents have taken

possession of the building on 24.01.2024. The petitioner

may be granted a breathing time to pay the balance 2024:KER:67534

amount due to the second respondent. Hence, the

judgment may be reviewed.

3. Heard; Sri. V.A. Johnson, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Syriac Joseph, the

learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. When the review petition came up for

consideration on 07.02.2024, the learned counsel for the

review petitioner emphatically stated that the petitioner

was willing to pay the entire outstanding amount in a

lump sum on or before 30.01.2024. In the light of the

above submission, this Court directed the respondents to

the petitioner in possession of the secured asset, without

any equity. Yet, the petitioner failed to comply with his

undertaking. Finally, by order dated 29.08.2024, this

Court directed the petitioner to vacate the secured

assets on or before 03.09.2024 and hand over the

possession to the respondent bank. The petitioner has

now surrendered possession to the respondent bank, due

to the non-compliance of his undertakings.

2024:KER:67534

5. On a consideration of the facts, materials on

record, and in view of the failure of the petitioner to

comply with the directions in the impugned judgment as

well as the orders passed in the review petition, I do not

find any error apparent face of record warranting the

review of the impugned judgment. The review petition is

meritless and is only to be dismissed.

Resultantly, the review petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE mtk/05.07.02.24 2024:KER:67534

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPTS DATED 28.11.2023 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 29.11.2023 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT

Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 25.01.2024 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT FOR RS.7.00.000/-

Annexure 4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 25.01.2024 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT FOR RS.50,000/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter