Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Kerala Represented By ... vs Lovedons Grand
2024 Latest Caselaw 26545 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26545 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

State Of Kerala Represented By ... vs Lovedons Grand on 5 September, 2024

Author: Dinesh Kumar Singh

Bench: Dinesh Kumar Singh

1RP NO. 278 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023




                                                1
                                                                         2024:KER:67529


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                                PRESENT

                           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH

                    THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 14TH BHADRA, 1946

                                            RP NO. 278 OF 2024

                 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA


        REVIEW PETITIONER/S:
          1           STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY(TAXES)
                      ROOM.NO.396, FIRST FLOOR, NEAR SOUTH CONFERENCE HALL, MAIN BLOCK,
                      SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

           2            THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-I
                        STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, MINI CIVIL STATION,
                        MUDAVOOR ROAD.P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN - 686669

           3            THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                        SPECIAL CIRCLE, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, SECOND
                        FLOOR, MINI CIVIL STATION, PERUMBAVOOR . P.O., PIN - 683542

           4            THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(ARREAR RECOVERY)
                        STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, SECOND FLOOR, MINI CIVIL
                        STATION, ALUVA.P.O., PIN - 683101

                        BY SPL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI MOHAMMED RAFIQ;
                        SMT RESMITHA RAMACHANDRAN GP



        RESPONDENT/S:

                        LOVEDONS GRAND, KARIMUGAL, PUTHENCRUZ, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED
                        BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER- T.C.MANI RESIDING IN
                        THANNIKKAMATTATHIL, KOLENCHERY, PIN - 682308


                THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.09.2024, THE COURT
        ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 2RP NO. 278 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023




                                                2
                                                             2024:KER:67529



                                                JUDGMENT

The Review Petition has been filed seeking a review of the

Judgment dated 30.11.2023 passed in a batch of writ petitions,

including W.P.(C) No.31822/2023.

2. This Court, after hearing the learned Counsel appearing

for the parties, vide the Judgment under review, held that in cases

where the return was filed on or before 31.03.2022 and turnover

tax was cleared on or before 30.04.2022 by the FL3/FL11 licensees

for the period from 22.05.2020 to 21.12.2020 and from 15.06.2021

to 25.09.2021 for the financial years 2020-21 and 2021-22, they

would not be liable to pay interest for delayed filing of the returns

and payment of turnover tax @ 5% on their parcel sales authorised

by the Government during the Covid lockdown period. This Court

considered all the documents which were placed on record and

the submissions of both sides.

3RP NO. 278 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023

2024:KER:67529

3. The learned Special Government Pleader, however,

submits that there has occurred an error apparent on the face of

the record which occasioned the review petitioner to seek review

of the Judgment dated 30.11.2023 passed by this Court. He further

submits that the reduction of tax from 10% to 5% was not limited

only in respect of the sale effected by the Bar attached Hotels

during the Covid lockdown period but, the exemption was granted

for the period from 2014-15 to 2015-16 as per the Cabinet Note

placed on record as Annexure-A by which the decision was taken

to amend Section 7A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The

exemption from payment of tax up to 5% by the Bar attached

Hotels on their parcel sales, would not mean that they were not

required to pay the tax @ 10%, but they could have claimed a

refund of the 5% tax and, therefore, they were liable to pay the

interest on delayed payment of turnover tax. He further submits

that the proposal to reduce the tax from 10% to 5% in the cabinet 4RP NO. 278 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023

2024:KER:67529

decision has to be considered in that respect. Learned Special

Government Pleader has also placed reliance on Annexure-B of

the review petition which is the decision of the Cabinet. The

relevant portion of Annexure-B reads as under;

"Decision: Proposal (1) of Note accepted.

(2) the suggestion in the note was considered. It has been decided to extend the time for filing of the returns till March 31, 2022 and till April 30, 2022 for payment of arrears."

4. On the other hand, Mr Mayankutty Mather, learned

Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the Annexure-

A document placed on record i.e. the note put up before the

Cabinet for consideration regarding the reduction of turnover tax

for the period during lockdown from 22.05.2020 to 21.12.2020 and

from 15.06.2021 to 25.09.2021 is specific that the Bar attached

Hotels and shops were required to pay 5% of the turnover tax as is

applicable in respect of the retail outlets run by the Beverages 5RP NO. 278 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023

2024:KER:67529

Corporation. In pursuance to the said cabinet note, the cabinet has

taken the decision, and thereafter, Exhibit P-2 was issued,

notifying the rate of turnover tax.

4.1 Once the notification was issued, the respondent herein

has remitted the tax, as per the time extended for filing the return

and remittance of tax. This Court has considered every aspect of

the matter, the submissions and documents placed on record.

There is no error apparent on the face of the record, which

requires this Court to review its well-considered Judgment dated

30.11.2023 in W.P.(C) No. 31822 of 2023 and connected matters.

5. I have considered the submissions. Review jurisdiction is to

be exercised in a very limited manner where there is an error

apparent on the face of the record. This Court has considered

every document and submission while rendering the Judgment

dated 30.11.2023 in W.P.(C) No. 31822 of 2023 and connected

matters. Furthermore, these documents were not part of the 6RP NO. 278 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023

2024:KER:67529

pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing or appeal. There has

to be finality to litigation. This Court, based on the submissions,

documents and evidence, has rendered the Judgment sought to be

reviewed.

Therefore, I find no error apparent on the face of the record

which warrants this Court to reconsider this Judgment under

review. There is no substance in this review petition and the same

is hereby dismissed.

Sd/-

DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE jjj 7RP NO. 278 OF 2024 IN WP(C) NO.31822 OF 2023

2024:KER:67529

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A ANNEXURE(A) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTE PLACED BEFORE THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS IN RESPECT OF NO.FILE NO.201/B3/2021/TD.

Annexure B ANNEXURE (B) TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CABINET MEETING OF MINISTERS,HELD ON 23.02.2022 ALONG WITH TRANSLATION OF RELEVANT PORTION IN ENGLISH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter