Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Kalady Kanjoor Rural Co-Operative ... vs The Intelligence Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 26270 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26270 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

M/S. Kalady Kanjoor Rural Co-Operative ... vs The Intelligence Officer on 3 September, 2024

Author: P Gopinath

Bench: P Gopinath

                                                        2024:KER:66518

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.

    TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 12TH BHADRA, 1946

                      WP(C) NO. 30648 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

          M/S. KALADY KANJOOR RURAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
          11/1197, A, B, KANJOOR ROAD, KALADY,
          ERNAKULAM - 683 575,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
          V. SINDHU, PIN - 683 575.


          BY ADVS.
          K.KRISHNA
          ACHYUTH MENON
          NIRMAL KRISHNAN




RESPONDENT:

          THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER,
          INTELLIGENCE UNIT, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX
          DEPARTMENT, MINI CIVIL STATION, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM,
          PIN - 683 542.

          BY SMT.THUSHARA JAMES, SR.GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 30648 OF 2024

                                   2

                                                       2024:KER:66518




                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner in this case is a Co-operative Society. They

have approached this Court challenging summons issued to them

under Section 70 of the CGST / SGST Acts. It is the case of the

petitioner that the principle of mutuality applies and at least till

31.12.2021 they were immune from the levy of GST on account of the

application of the principle of mutuality. Reference is in this regard

is also made to the judgment of this Court in Indian Medical

Association v. Union of India and others [Judgment dated

23.07.2024 in W.P(C)No.23853 of 2023]. They pray that a

declaration be granted that they are not liable to the levy of G.S.T.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the

petitioner is not entitled to any relief. It is submitted that in the

Indian Medical Association (supra) referred to by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, it has been held that there is no principle

of mutuality in respect of the services offered by the Indian Medical

Association to its members. It is submitted that similarly, the

services offered by the petitioner society to its members cannot be

said to be immune from the liability to GST on account of the WP(C) NO. 30648 OF 2024

2024:KER:66518

principle of mutuality. It is submitted that the petitioner has only

been issued with a show cause notice and it is for the petitioner to

appear before the competent authority and substantiate that they

are not liable to GST in case they have such a case.

3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader and having

regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am of the

opinion that since only a show cause notice has been issued to the

petitioner, it is premature for the petitioner to challenge the same by

approaching this Court by filing a writ petition. If the petitioner has

a case that services to its members are not liable to GST, it is for the

petitioner to establish the same before the authorities. Any

contention of the petitioner on the basis of the findings of this Court

in Indian Medical Association (supra) can also be considered by the

competent authority, in accordance with the law.

In the light of the above, this writ petition will stand

disposed of directing the respondent to consider the claim, if any, of

the petitioner after adverting to any reply that may be filed by the

petitioner and affording to them an opportunity of hearing and in

accordance with the law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, WP(C) NO. 30648 OF 2024

2024:KER:66518

within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified

copy of this judgment. I make it clear that I have not expressed any

opinion on the merits of the petitioner's contention and it will be

open to the competent authority to decide the matter, in accordance

with the law.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 30648 OF 2024

2024:KER:66518

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30648/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 COPY OF SUMMONS ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DTD. 09-10-2023

Exhibit P2 COPY OF STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DTD.

                     26-10-2023

Exhibit P3           COPY OF SUMMONS ISSUED BY THE
                     RESPONDENT DTD. 02-05-2024

Exhibit P4           COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE
                     RESPODNENT DTD. 25-07-2024

Exhibit P5           COPY OF REPLY FILED BY THE PETITIONER
                     BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DTD. 19-08-2024

Exhibit P6           COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 6774/2012
                     OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DTD. 05-02-2013

Exhibit P7           COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 19231/2023
                     OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DTD. 14-06-2023
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter