Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nivin vs State Bank Of India Sbi
2024 Latest Caselaw 25907 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25907 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2024

Kerala High Court

Nivin vs State Bank Of India Sbi on 30 September, 2024

Author: Dinesh Kumar Singh

Bench: Dinesh Kumar Singh

WP(C) NO. 32563 OF 2024

                                     1

                                                      2024:KER:72528
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH

     MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 / 8TH ASWINA, 1946

                          WP(C) NO. 32563 OF 2024

PETITIONER:

           NIVIN
           AGED 33 YEARS
           S/O VIJAYAN NELLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KSHB COLONY,
           KALLEPULLY, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678005


           BY ADVS.
           T.K.SANDEEP
           SWETHA R.




RESPONDENTS:

    1      STATE BANK OF INDIA SBI
           REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER MG ROAD BRANCH,
           ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682011

    2      AUTHORISED OFFICER
           STATE BANK OF INDIA MG ROAD ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682011



           SRI. JAYESH MOHAN KUMAR .K-SC


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.09.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 32563 OF 2024

                                           2

                                                                    2024:KER:72528
                                 JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of September, 2024

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking

the following prayers:

i) issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ order or direction, toquash EXHIBIT-P1 notice issued under SARFAESI Act andfurther proceedings pursuant to the same initiated bytherespondent Bank against the property of the petitioner.

ii) Issue a Writ of mandamus or any other writ order or direction, directing to the respondent bank to permit the petitioner toremit the defaulted arrears in reasonable installments;

iii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction, directing to the respondent bank to regularise the loan; And

iv) Grant such other reliefs as are deem just and necessaryinthefacts and circumstances of the case.

2. The petitioner and his brother had availed a housing

loan of Rs.19,29,659/- and a top up loan of Rs.12,50,000/-

and one Suraksha loan from the respondent bank. The

petitioner has mortgaged his property having an extent of

0.0307 Hectors of land and building in old Sy.No.715/4

resy.Block No.2/16 in Palakkad 2 village, Palakkad2 taluk

Palakkad District. The term of the loan for repayment is 10 WP(C) NO. 32563 OF 2024

2024:KER:72528 years ie, up to 2029. The petitioner has defaulted in

making repayment of the loans taken from the respondent

bank. Therefore, the bank after classifying the petitioner's

loan accounts as NPA, has proceeded under the provisions

of the SARFAESI Act and Rules made thereunder.

3. The learned counsel for the bank submits that if the

petitioner makes payment of substantial amount upfront

and remaining overdue amount in few instalments, along

with the regular instalments, the bank shall regularize the

loan accounts of the petitioner. As on today, the overdue

amount is Rs.5,00,000/- and the total outstanding amount

is Rs.40,00,000/-.

4. Considering the said stand of the learned counsel for

the bank, the present writ petition is disposed of in the

following terms:

i. The petitioner shall pay an upfront amount of

Rs.1,00,000/- on or before 15.10.2024 along with

one regular instalment and remaining overdue

amount in 5 equal monthly instalments, along

with the regular instalments. The 1st instalment

is to be paid on or before 15.11.2024 and

remaining 4 instalments on or before 15 th day of WP(C) NO. 32563 OF 2024

2024:KER:72528 each succeeding month.

ii. Once the petitioner pays the entire overdue

amount, the bank shall regularize the loan

account of the petitioner.

iv. In case of failure to make payment of

Rs.1,00,000/- along with one instalment or any

subsequent instalments as directed above, the

bank shall be free to proceed further against the

petitioner for realizing the outstanding loan

amount.

With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition

stands finally disposed of.

Sd/-

DINESH KUMAR SINGH

JUDGE AP WP(C) NO. 32563 OF 2024

2024:KER:72528 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 32563/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPYOF THEPOSSESSION NOTICE UNDER SECTION 13(4) AND RULE 3 UNDER SECURITIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ANDENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT 2002 DATED 31/7/2024

Exhibit P2 TRUECOPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT DATED 2/8/2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter