Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arun. R ( Sought To Be Impleaded ) vs Aruvipuram Sree Narayana Dharma ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 30001 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 30001 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024

Kerala High Court

Arun. R ( Sought To Be Impleaded ) vs Aruvipuram Sree Narayana Dharma ... on 22 October, 2024

                                                      2024:KER:79869
WA NO.1687 OF 2024
                                -: 1 :-


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR
                                   &
                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
   TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2024 / 30TH ASWINA, 1946
                         WA NO.1687 OF 2024
  ORDER DATED 30.9.2024 IN I.A.No.11/2024 IN WP(C) NO.8095 OF
                  2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
                         ---------------
APPELLANT/SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT
No.8 :-

            ARUN. R ( SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEADED )
            S/O.G.RAJU, ARUNIMA, MYYANAD P.O, KOLLAM,
            PIN - 691 303, KERALA ( SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEADED )

            BY ADVS.
            T.RAMPRASAD UNNI
            K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)
            S.M.PRASANTH
            SHEHIN S.
            DEVIKA S.


RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :-

     1      ARUVIPURAM SREE NARAYANA DHARMA PARIPALANA YOGAM
            REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, V. K. NATESAN,
            S/O. KESAVAN, SNDP YOGAM HEAD OFFICE, P. B. NO. 512.
            JAWAHAR NAGAR, KARBALA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 001

     2      V.K.NATESAN
            S/O.KESAVAN, GENERAL SECRETARY,
            SNDP YOGAM HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.512, JAWAHAR NAGAR,
            KARBALA, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001. VELLAPPALLIL HOUSE,
            KANCHUKULANGARA P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA,
            PIN - 688 582

     3      DR.M.N.SOMAN
            PRESIDENT, SNDP YOGAM HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.512,
            JAWAHAR NAGAR, KARBALA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 001
     4      THUSHAR
                                                          2024:KER:79869
WA NO.1687 OF 2024
                                -: 2 :-


             S/O.V.K.NATESAN, VICE PRESIDENT,
             SNDP YOGAM HEAD OFFICE, P.B.NO.512, JAWAHAR NAGAR,
             KARBALA, KOLLAM, PIN-691 001 VELLAPPALLIL HOUSE,
             KANCHUKULANGARA P.O., CHERTHALA,
             ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 582

     5       SANTHOSH @ ARAYAKKANDIL SANTHOSH
             DEVASWOM SECRETARY, SNDP YOGAM HEAD OFFICE,
             P.B.NO.512, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KARBALA,
             KOLLAM, PIN - 691 001

     6       PROF.M.K.SANOO, AGED 94 YEARS
             S/O.MANGALATH M.C.KESAVAN, 'SANDHYA', KARIKKAMURI,
             ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 011

     7       ADV.M.K.SASEENDRAN, AGED 72 YEARS
             S/O LATE M.I.KRISHNAN, MYLAMPARAMBIL HOUSE,
             CONVENT ROAD, PONNURUNNI, VYTILA P.O.,
             ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 019

     8       STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES (J) DEPARTMENT,
             SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 682 031

     9       INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION
             EX-MAYOR R BALAKRISHNAN NAIR ROAD,
             NEAR DISTRICT COURT, VANCHIYOOR,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 035

             BY SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.)
             BY SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU



      THIS    WRIT   APPEAL   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
22.10.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                                 2024:KER:79869
WA NO.1687 OF 2024
                                     -: 3 :-


                                  JUDGMENT

Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2024

Nitin Jamdar, C.J.

Heard Sri. K. Ramakumar, learned Senior Advocate for the Appellant, Sri. A.N.Rajan Babu, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5, Sri. P.B.Krishnan, learned Senior Advocate for Respondent No.6.

2. The learned Senior Advocate for the Appellant, at the outset, points out that though the appeal is filed against dismissing the application for impleadment - I.A. No.11 of 2024 in W.P.(C) No.8095 of 2024, by mistake, both in the appeal and in the application reference is made to I.A. No.14 of 2024. Accordingly, permission is granted to amend the number of the application from I.A. No.14 of 2024 to I.A. No.11 of 2024 as all the pleadings indicate that challenge is to the order passed in I.A. No.14 of 2024.

3. By the impugned order dated 30 September 2024, the application filed by the Appellant is rejected with the following reasons :-

"I.A. No.11 of 2024 in WP(C) No.8095 of 2024 This is an application for impleading. The case was already heard and arguments closed. Application for impleading at this stage cannot be entertained and the application is dismissed. This order is without prejudice to the contentions that have been raised by the Petitioners and the said contentions are left open."

4. On a perusal of the above order, we note that the rejection is not on merits but on the ground that the case was already heard and arguments closed and therefore, the application cannot be entertained. Ordinarily, if 2024:KER:79869 WA NO.1687 OF 2024

this is the ground for not entertaining an application for impleadment, what would thereafter follow would be a final judgment. However, we note that on the same day, further orders are passed in W.P.(C) No.8095 of 2024 including that of appointment of a retired Judge of this Court as Chairperson of the committee and other directions. Thus the matter is not disposed of and the cases are posted for further orders on 28 October 2024.

5. According to us, if the proceedings are pending and further orders are being passed then the application could not have been rejected on the ground that the main matter is closed for orders. The application of the Appellant for impleadment thus will have to be decided on merits.

6. Accordingly, the order passed in I.A. No.11 of 2024 dated 30 September 2024 is set aside and the I.A. filed by the Applicant for impleadment is restored to the file of the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge will decide the same on its own merits. We clarify that we have not looked into the merits of the case for impleadment. It is for the learned Single Judge to decide the same on its own merits.

7. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

Sd/-

NITIN JAMDAR CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

S. MANU JUDGE Jvt

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter