Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akhilraj vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 33610 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 33610 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Akhilraj vs State Of Kerala on 21 November, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

CRL.MC NO. 8962 OF 2024
                                      1




                                                              2024:KER:87310
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

     THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                           CRL.MC NO. 8962 OF 2024

     CRIME NO.7/2019 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

            AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.180 OF 2019 OF

                 JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, VARKALA

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
           AKHILRAJ, AGED 28 YEARS,
           S/O RAJENDRAN PILLAI,
           RESIDING AT AMBILI BHAVAN,
           NEAR THOCADU LIBRARY, CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695143

              BY ADV.SRI.AKHIL SUSEENDRAN


RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
     1     STATE OF KERALA
           REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
           HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
           PIN - 682 031.

      2       STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
              VARKALA POLICE STATION,
              VARKALA KALLAMBALAM RD, VARKALA,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 141.

      3       RASHEED, AGED 60 YEARS,
              S/O. IBRAHIM KUNJU,
              RESIDING AT KIZHAKKATHIL VEEDU,
              KAPPAMVILA, KUDAVOOR, VARKALA,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 313.

              BY ADV.SMT. MAHIMA FOR R3
              SRI. NOUSHAD K. A. (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR)
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.11.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 8962 OF 2024
                                                   2




                                                                                 2024:KER:87310
                               BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                          ......................................................
                                   Crl.M.C.No.8962 of 2024
                           ...................................................
                      Dated this the 21st day of November, 2024


                                               ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; to quash all proceedings against him.

2. Petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.180/2019 on the files of the Judicial First

Class Magistrate Court-I, Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District arising out of

Crime No.7/2019 of Varkala Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District

registered for the offences under Sections 427 and 153 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860. The third respondent is the de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 02.01.2019, threw stones

to the window of the CPI party office at Varkala during the procession,

thereby committing the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the

respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been

settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioner ought to be

quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences CRL.MC NO. 8962 OF 2024

2024:KER:87310 alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex

Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of

the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to

put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder

Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and

Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9

SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-B affidavit filed by the third respondent. The

learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is

understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto complainant stands

by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and

no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for

granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will

only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.180/2019 on the

files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Varkala, are quashed.

Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/21/11/2024 CRL.MC NO. 8962 OF 2024

2024:KER:87310

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE A THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 7/2019 OF VARKALA POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PUNISHABLE U/SS.427 AND 153 OF IPC PENDING AS CC NO. 180/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

ANNEXURE B AFFIDAVIT OF COMPROMISE OF RESPONDENT NO. 3 DATED 20/08/2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter