Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arjun Shabu vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 33443 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 33443 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Arjun Shabu vs State Of Kerala on 21 November, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

CRL.MC NO. 9669 OF 2022

                                 1

                                                2024:KER:88134
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                   CRL.MC NO. 9669 OF 2022

PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.6 :

          ARJUN SHABU
          AGED 24 YEARS
          S/O SHABU, YOGACHIRAYIL HOUSE,
          AROOKUTTY P.O., AROOKUTTY VILLAGE,
          CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
          PIN - 688526

          BY ADVS.
          V.N.SANKARJEE
          V.N.MADHUSUDANAN
          R.UDAYA JYOTHI
          M.M.VINOD
          M.SUSEELA
          KEERTHI B. CHANDRAN
          VIJAYAN PILLAI P.K.
          C.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR
          NITHEESH.M
          SUKANYA S.


RESPONDENT/ STATE & COMPLAINANT :

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
          HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
          PIN - 682031

    2     THE EXCISE RANGE OFFICER
          EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
          PIN - 682018

          SMT.SREEJA V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR



     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 9669 OF 2022

                                      2

                                                          2024:KER:88134
                   BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                   =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                      Crl.M.C.No.9669 of 2022
                   =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
              Dated this the 21st day of November, 2024

                                   ORDER

Petitioner is the 6th accused in S.C.No.954 of 2022 on the files of

the Additional Assistant Sessions Court-I, Ernakulam. The accused, six in

number are alleged to have committed the offences under Section 58 of

the Abkari Act, 1077 (for short, 'the Act').

2. According to the prosecution, the accused were found on

26.11.2020, in possession of 10.290 litres in 27 bottles of liquor that

were permitted to be sold only in the State of Goa and had illegally

imported the same to Kerala and thereby committed the offences alleged.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended

that the provisions of Section 58 of the Act are not attracted from the

allegations in the final report. According to the learned counsel, Section

58 of the Act requires not only possession without lawful authority but

also the knowledge that the contraband was unlawfully imported or

transported. In the absence of any allegation of knowledge, prosecution

of the petitioner is an abuse of the process of court.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted

that the contentions raised by the petitioner are all matters for trial and

this Court cannot in exercise of the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

quash the proceedings on the above basis.

CRL.MC NO. 9669 OF 2022

2024:KER:88134

5. I have considered the rival contentions.

6. It is true that Section 58 of the Act has two limbs, (1) which

deals with possession of any quantity of liquor and (2) knowledge that the

contraband had not paid duty or tax due under the Act. The aforesaid

two limbs cannot be decided in a proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as

they require evidence to be adduced. Though the learned counsel for the

petitioner relied upon the decision in Jabbar v. State of Kerala [2020

(5) KLT 12], I am of the view that the said case was decided after

evidence was adduced and the issue was dealt with in a criminal revision

petition challenging the conviction and sentence.

7. In the instant case, since evidence is required to be

appreciated, I am of the view that it is too premature a stage to arrive at

a conclusion that the prosecution is an abuse of the process of law. The

circumstances pointed out are all matters for the trial court to decide

based on the nature of evidence adduced therein.

8. The power to quash a criminal proceeding should be

exercised with circumspection, and that too in exceptional cases. While

exercising the inherent power, this Court ought not to embark upon an

enquiry as to the reliability, genuineness, or otherwise of the allegations

made in the FIR, or the final report. The Supreme Court had observed in

Mahendra K.C. v. State of Karnataka and Ors. [2022 (2) SCC 129],

that the power under section 482 should be exercised sparingly and

cautiously and only when the Court is of the opinion that there will be a

gross miscarriage of justice, should resort be made to such powers. CRL.MC NO. 9669 OF 2022

2024:KER:88134

9. Recently a three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court had, in

Priyanka Jaiswal v. State of Jharkhand [2024 SCC Online SC 685]

observed that, at the time of examining the prayer for quashing of the

criminal proceedings, the court exercising extraordinary jurisdiction can

neither undertake to conduct a mini trial nor enter into an appreciation of

evidence of the case. It was also observed that the correctness or

otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint cannot be examined

on the touchstone of the probable defence that the accused may raise to

stave off the prosecution and any such misadventure by the Courts

resulting in proceedings being quashed would be set aside. The

observations in the decision in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Akhil Sharda

[2022 SCC OnLine SC 820] that no mini trial can be conducted by the

High Court in the exercise of powers under S.482 Cr.PC was referred to in

the above decision.

Accordingly, I find no reason to interfere in exercise of the

inherent powers. Hence, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM CRL.MC NO. 9669 OF 2022

2024:KER:88134

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

Annexure-I TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 27.11.2020 IN ABKARI CRIME NO. 118/2020 OF THE EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, ERNAKULAM TOGETHER WITH COPY OF MAHAZAR

Annexure-II TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.8.2020 IN JABBAR V. STATE OF KERALA, 2020 (4) KHC 652 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT

Annexure-III TRUE COPY OF THE DEGREE CERTIFICATE DATED 6.3.2019 OF THE PETITIONER

Annexure-IV TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION IN 7TH NATIONAL YOUTH RURAL GAMES-2020 OF THE PETITIONER

Annexure-IV(a) TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION IN THURAVOOR SUB DISTRICT SCHOOLS' CHAMPIONSHIP 2013-14 OF THE PETITIONER

Annexure-IV(b) TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT OF THE PETITIONER

Annexure-V CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 28.5.2022 IN ABKARI CRIME NO. 118/2020 (CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT) OF EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, ERNAKULAM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter