Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 33114 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 November, 2024
J. P. P. No. 2 of 2024
-1-
2024:KER:89321
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 23RD KARTHIKA,
1946
JPP NO. 2 OF 2024
PETITIONER/S:
SUO MOTU,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF
HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN -
110001
BY ADVS.
K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP, ADVOCATE GENERAL
SHRI.V.MANU, SENIOR G.P.
THIS JUDICIAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 14.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J. P. P. No. 2 of 2024
-2-
2024:KER:89321
ORDER
Dated this the 14th day of November 2024
Nitin Jamdar, C. J.
This suo motu petition is placed before us on the judicial side by the Registry under the roster assignment 'suo motu matters in judicial practice and procedure' in view of the order dated 25 July 2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Con. Case (C) No. 551 of 2024 and connected cases highlighting the delays in listing contempt cases, review petitions, time extension petitions, etc., when one among the Judges of the Division Bench retires or when the Judge who passed the order/judgment while sitting in Single retires or when both the Judges of the Division Bench are part of different Benches as per the Roster in force, we deem it appropriate to direct Registry to place this order before the Division Bench dealing with matters relating to practice and procedure in the judicial and administrative sections of the High Court. Therefore, it will be necessary to evolve the practice to avoid delays.
2. The Registry has submitted a report that, as per practice, whenever a proposal for amending, framing or deleting the Rules arises, it is placed before the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice usually directs that it be placed before the Committee of the Judges constituted for Framing High Court Rules and High Court Service Rules. If the Committee finds it necessary, it recommends amendments/framing/deletion to the High Court Rules. The
2024:KER:89321 recommendations of the Committee are then placed before the Full Court for approval. The Registry has pointed out that in cases where instructions to the Registry suffice, an Office Memorandum is issued under the orders of the Chief Justice on the administrative side. This being the position, it will not be necessary to take up the matter on the judicial side; the Registry will place the subject on the administrative side to decide/direct the appropriate action to be adopted.
3. The suo motu proceedings are accordingly closed.
Sd/-
NITIN JAMDAR CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
S. MANU JUDGE
Eb
2024:KER:89321
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A COPY OF COMMON ORDER DATED 25/07/2024 IN CONT. CASE(C) NOS.551, 569, 632, 643,789 AND 1161 OF 2024
Annexure B COPY OF OM HCKL/1143/2024-A7-HC KERALA DATED 20-07-2024
Annexure C OFFICE NOTES AND ORDERS OF THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DATED 01/08/2024
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!