Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Adarsh A. Nair vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 32899 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32899 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Adarsh A. Nair vs State Of Kerala on 13 November, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                                                    2024:KER:88097
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

  WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1946

                      CRL.MC NO. 8131 OF 2024

     CRIME NO.985/2023 OF Infopark Police Station, Ernakulam

     AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.570 OF 2023 OF

JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KAKKANAD

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

          ADARSH A. NAIR
          AGED 23 YEARS
          S/O, AJEETHKUMAR, SAHYADRI HOUSE, NARIYAPURAM P.O,
          VALLIKODE, PATHANAMTHITTA,, PIN - 689648


          BY ADVS.
          M.B.SHYNI
          RAJESH KUMAR R.
          V.R.ANILKUMAR
          SARAFUDHEEN T.
          ELDHOSE JOY
          AJITH P.C.



RESPONDENT/COMPLAIANT:

          STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          PIN - 682031



     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 8131 OF 2024                       2

                                                                      2024:KER:88097

                            BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                       ---------------------------------------------
                             Crl.MC No. 8131 of 2024
                   ----------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 13th day of November, 2024

                                      ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 528 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash all proceedings

against him.

2. Petitioner is the sole accused in C.C No.570/2023 on the files

of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakkanad, arising out of Crime

No.985/2023 of Infopark Police Station, Kakkanad, registered for the

offences punishable under Section 27(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'N.D.P.S Act').

3. According to the prosecution, on 24.06.2023 the accused was

found smoking a beedi and on seeing the police, he threw it and

attempted to run away. Thereafter, since, the Detecting Officer smelt

ganja in the air, he questioned the accused and seized the beedi, and

registered an FIR alleging the offences mentioned above. Subsequently,

after completing the investigation, a final report has been filed alleging

commission of the offences.

4. The issue that arises for consideration is whether the sense of

smell of the investigating officer is sufficient to charge an accused with

the offence under Section 27(b) of the N.D.P.S Act.

2024:KER:88097

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

the learned Public Prosecutor.

6. In a decision in Ibnu Shijil v. State of Kerala [2024 (5) KHC

476], this Court has already held that the olfactory ability of an

investigating officer is not sufficient for initiating proceedings under the

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act against an accused.

7. In the instant case, the beedi allegedly containing ganja was

seized by the investigating officer and was produced before the court.

However, no forensic examination has been conducted. On the other

hand, the final report alleges that the beedi smoked by the accused

contains ganja.

8. In the decision in Anurag Shaji v. State of Kerala [2023

KHC 9406], this Court has observed that, when no material has been

collected by the investigating officer to substantiate that the accused

consumed narcotic drugs, continuing the prosecution is an abuse of

process of court. However, it is seen that the beedi smoked by the

accused has already been produced before the Court and therefore, it

cannot be stated that no materials are collected by the investigating

officer.

9. Notwithstanding the above, since the beedi has not been

subjected to any chemical analysis, the entire proceedings has been

initiated on the basis of the olfactory sense of the investigating officer.

Such a procedure is not permissible under law. It is necessary that

inorder to bring home the guilt of an accused, the contraband seized or

2024:KER:88097

alleged to have been consumed must have been subjected to forensic

analysis, or atleast medical evidence ought to have been adduced to

prove the nature of contraband consumed by the accused. Such a

material is lacking in the final report. Hence, I am satisfied that this is a

fit case where the inherent jurisdiction of this Court can be exercised to

quash the proceedings.

10. Accordingly, the proceeding in C.C No.570/2023 on the files

of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakkanad, arising out of Crime

No.985/2023 of Infopark Police Station, Kakkanad, is hereby quashed.

The Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJ

2024:KER:88097

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure 1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.985/2023 OF INFOPARK POLICE STATION

Annexure 2 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO NO.985/2023 OF INFOPARK POLICE STATION

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter