Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32848 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
Wednesday, the 13th day of November 2024 / 22nd Karthika, 1946
UNNUMB.CMAP.NO.1/2024 IN RP NO. 1001 OF 2024(FILING NO.)
(ARISING FROM JUDGMENT DATED 07.04.2021 WA 425/2021 OF THIS COURT)
APPLICANT/REVIEW PETITIONER:
NAZEERA NOUSHAD,AGED 46 YEARS,W/O. NOUSHAD,CHERUPARAMBIL
HOUSE,GCDA,SANTHI NIVAS,VEDIMARA, PARAVUR,ERNAKULAM,PIN-683520
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION(CBSE),REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHAIRPERSON, SHIKSHA KENDRA 2,COMMUNITY CENTER, PREET
VIHAR,DELHI,PIN-110092
2. THE REGIONAL OFFICER CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY
EDUCATION(CBSE),BLOCK B,2ND FLOOR,LIC DIVISIONAL OFFICE
CAMPUS,PATTOM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695004.
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to condone the delay
of 1062 days occured in filing the above Review Petition in the interest
of justice.
This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon hearing the arguments
of SRI.N.RENJU, Advocate for the petitioner, the court passed the
following:
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
&
GOPINATH P., J.
-------------------------------
Unnumbered C.M.Appln. & C.M.Appln.No.1 OF 2024
in
Unnumbered R.P. OF 2024 (Filing No.1001 OF 2024)
in
W.A.NO.425 OF 2021
&
Unnumbered R.P. OF 2024 in W.A.NO.425 OF 2021
-----------------------------------
Dated this the 13th day of November, 2024
ORDER
Gopinath P., J.
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Review
Petitioner on the application seeking condonation of delay in filing the
Review Petition, the application seeking condonation of delay in
representing the Review Petition after curing defects, as also on the
Review Petition, we find that the second Review Petition itself is not
maintainable. Therefore, we find no grounds to condone the delay.
Even if we were to condone the delay, there is no question of
maintaining the second Review Petition. Therefore, the applications
for condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition, representing
the Review Petition, after curing defects, and the Review Petition will
stand dismissed.
Sd/-
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE prp/13/11/24
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!