Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Balasundaram S vs State Bank Of India
2024 Latest Caselaw 32352 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32352 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Balasundaram S vs State Bank Of India on 8 November, 2024

Author: Anil K. Narendran

Bench: Anil K.Narendran

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                                    &
               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S.
         Friday, the 8th day of November 2024 / 17th Karthika, 1946
                      WA NO. 1606 OF 2024(FILING NO.)
  ORDER DATED 22.07.2024 IN RP 701/2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT(S)/ REVIEW PETITIONER:

     BALASUNDARAM S., AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. SHANMUGHASUNDARAM, RETIRED
     DEPUTY MANAGER, STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE (PRESENTLY STATE BANK OF
     INDIA), LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN: 695
     012, RESIDING AT "HANUKRIPA", T.C.12/1057, CONVENT ROAD, KARUNYA
     LANE, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695015

   BY ADVS.N.NANDAKUMARA MENON (SR.),SMITHA S.PILLAI, ALICE
   THOMAS, M.C.SINY, P.K.MANOJKUMAR.
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

  1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, LOCAL
     HEAD OFFICE, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695012.
  2. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (PPG), STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD
     OFFICE, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695012.


     SRI.P.RAMKRISHNAN, STANDING COUNSEL FOR R1 & R2.

     This Un-numbered Writ Appeal No.../2024 (Filing No.1606/24) having
come up for orders on 08.11.2024, the court on the same day passed the
following:




                                                              P.T.O
 W.A.No............ of 2024
(Filing No.1606 of 2024)

                               -1-

      ANIL K. NARENDRAN & MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
           --------------------------------------------
                     W.A.No............ of 2024
                     (Filing No.1606 of 2024)
               -------------------------------------
            Dated this the 8th day of November, 2024


                             ORDER

Anil K. Narendran, J.

This writ appeal filed under Section 5 of the Kerala High

Court Act, 1958 arises out of the order dated 22.07.2024 of the

learned Single Judge in R.P.No.701 of 2024, which in turn arose

out of the judgment dated 06.06.2024 in W.P.(C)No.19392 of

2021. By the order dated 22.07.2024, that review petition

stands dismissed.

2. Challenging the judgment dated 06.06.2024 in W.P.

(C)No.19392 of 2021, the appellant filed W.A.No.1298 of 2024,

in which the filing delay of 47 days was condoned by the order

dated 21.10.2024 in C.M.Application No.1 of 2024.

3. In this writ appeal, Registry has noted defect, placing

reliance on the judgment dated 07.02.2014 by a Division Bench

of this Court in Co.Appeal No.11 of 2013, arising out of Company

Application No.186 of 2013 in Company Petition No.24 of 2009.

That judgment was rendered by a Division Bench of this Court

taking note of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Municipal

Corporation of Delhi v. Yashwant Singh Negi [(2020) 9 W.A.No............ of 2024 (Filing No.1606 of 2024)

SCC 815].

4. During the course of arguments, the learned Senior

Counsel for the appellant would place reliance on the judgment

of the Apex Court in Bussa Overseas and Properties (P) Ltd

v. Union of India and Another [(2016) 4 SCC 696].

5. We heard the arguments of the learned Senior

Counsel for the appellant and the learned Standing Counsel for

the State Bank of India.

6. Having considered the submissions made at the bar,

in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Yashwant

Singh Negi [(2020) 9 SCC 815] and Bussa Overseas and

Properties (P) Ltd [(2016) 4 SCC 696], we find that in those

cases the Apex Court was dealing with the matters in which

instead of assailing the basic judgment, the challenge was made

only against the order passed in review. In that context the Apex

Court held that in the absence of merger, challenge against the

order in review cannot be entertained when the basic judgment

is not assailed by filing an appeal.

7. In the instant case, the appellant has already

challenged the judgment of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)

No.19392 of 2021 by filing W.A.No.1298 of 2024. Thereafter, in

this writ appeal, the appellant is challenging the order of the

learned Single Judge in R.P.No.701 of 2024. Such an appeal is W.A.No............ of 2024 (Filing No.1606 of 2024)

maintainable in law. Therefore, the defect noted by the Registry

cannot be sustained.

Registry to number the writ appeal and list for admission on

20.11.2024 along with W.A.No.1298 of 2024.

sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

sd/-

MURALEE KRISHNA S., JUDGE

Scl/

08-11-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter