Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saidalavi Poniyeri vs Raihanath Padancherry
2024 Latest Caselaw 32342 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 32342 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2024

Kerala High Court

Saidalavi Poniyeri vs Raihanath Padancherry on 8 November, 2024

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

O.P(FC) No.647 of 2024         1

                                                2024:KER:83256
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                   PRESENT

         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

                                      &

          THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA

 FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2024 / 17TH KARTHIKA, 1946

                         O.P(FC) NO.647 OF 2024

 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.10.2024 IN I.A.NO.7 OF 2024 IN

             OP NO.50 OF 2019 OF FAMILY COURT, TIRUR

PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT:

            SAIDALAVI PONIYERI, AGED 70 YEARS
            S/O MOHAMMED PONIYERI, PONIYERI HOUSE,
            ADHYASSERY (PO), TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST,
            PIN - 676106

            BY ADVS.
            M.DEVESH
            M.ANUROOP
            MURSHID ALI M.
            JYOTHIS MARY



RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/1ST & 3RD RESPONDENTS:

     1      RAIHANATH PADANCHERRY, AGED 38 YEARS
            W/O PONIYERI MUHAMMED BASHEER, PADANJERI HOUSE,
            PONMUNDAM AMSOM, ADHYASSERY(PO), TIRUR TALUK,
            MALAPPURAM DIST, PIN - 676106
 O.P(FC) No.647 of 2024    2

                                               2024:KER:83256

     2      PONIYERI MUHAMMED BASHEER, AGED 41 YEARS
            S/O SIADALAVI, PONIYERI HOUSE, ADHYASSERY (PO),
            TIRUR TALU, MALAPPURAM DIST, PIN - 676106

     3      SALIYA, AGED 60 YEARS
            W/O SIADALAVI, PONIYERI HOUSE, ADHYASSERY (PO),
            TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DIST, PIN - 676106


            BY ADVS.
            TOBIAS TOGI MATHEW
            PAUL P. ABRAHAM(K/000228/2017)
            KESHAV KRISHNAN(K/000166/2016)
            ANANDHA KRISHNAN R.(K/4363/2024)



      THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08.11.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 O.P(FC) No.647 of 2024         3

                                                       2024:KER:83256
                              JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran J.

The petitioner challenges Ext.P6 order of the learned

Family Court, Tirur, through which, it dismissed Ext.P5

application filed by him - invoking the provisions of Order XVI

Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure - to call a witness by

name, Sri.E.P.Abdul Latheef.

2. The specific averment in the affidavit in support of

Ext.P5 I.A is that, when PW2 was examined, he had referred to

the afore person as being the person, who had intervened as a

Mediator in the matrimonial disputes between the parties. On

such basis, the petitioner, through the said application, called for

the aforementioned person as a witness.

3. However, the learned Family Court issued the impugned

order, merely saying that the application is belated, but without

explaining why it was so; and then holding that the attempt of

the respondent [petitioner herein] is to fill up lacunae by filing

additional witness list, without having done so earlier.

2024:KER:83256

4. We do not propose to speak on the merits at this time

because, Ext.P6 does not disclose the reasons that lead the

learned Judge to dismiss the application, except for recording

that "it is highly belated". Why it is belated and on what basis

the learned Court entered into the finding that the application is

meant to fill up lacunae in evidence, is not available from the

said order. Obviously, we cannot decide the matter in any

manner, but will have to ask the learned Family Court to

reconsider I.A.No.7 of 2024, in O.P.No.50 of 2019, appropriately,

after hearing both sides.

5. In such perspective and without entering into the merits

of any of the rival contentions and leaving them all open, we

allow this Original Petition and set aside Ext.P6 order of the

learned Family Court, Tirur; with a consequential direction to it

to reconsider I.A.No.7 of 2024 in O.P.No.50 of 2019, after

affording necessary opportunities to both sides, as expeditiously

as is possible, but not later than two weeks from the date of

receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2024:KER:83256 For the afore purpose, we direct the parties to mark

appearance before the learned Family Court, Tirur, on

12.11.2024.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

M.B.SNEHALATHA JUDGE

sp/08/11/2024

2024:KER:83256 APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 647/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF MEMORANDUM OF OP 50/2019 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT TIRUR DATED 21/01/2019

Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER STATEMENT DATED 19/12/2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER

Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CHIEF AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE ORGINAL PETITIONER DATED 04/04/2024

Exhibit P4 .THE TRUE COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN DATED 07/08/2024

Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN FOR EXAMINATION OF ADDITIONAL WITNESS BY ACCEPTING THE WITNESS LIST DATED NIL

Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF ORDER IN IA 7/2024 IN OP 50/2019 DATED 15/10/2024

Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF IA 8/2024 IN OP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter